To: vaper69
I will post video as soon as I have it, and the latest numbers of a decline in violence in Iraq. Which Paul says is because the Brits are pulling out of Basra. Problem is that the violence in Basra declined 80% WHILE the Brits were there. They are pulling out because there is no more need for them there. The violence is significantly down all over Iraq. What's Paul's leftist-mantra excuse for the huge drop in incidents in Anbar Province? In Baghdad? In Mosul? In Tal Afar? I could go on, but you get my drift.
The sad thing is, Ron Paul can say any outlandish, moonbatty thing he wants and his followers will eat it right up without question.
The mark of a true cult leader.
12 posted on
11/29/2007 3:37:08 AM PST by
Allegra
(Greetings from a kinder, gentler Iraq. God bless US and Coalition Forces.)
To: Allegra
Not only is Ron Paul losing his grip on reality, he may be downright dangerous.
13 posted on
11/29/2007 4:42:19 AM PST by
corlorde
(New Hampshire)
To: Allegra
The only thing more embarrassing than Run Paul is his support here on FreeRepublic.
14 posted on
11/29/2007 7:21:46 AM PST by
elhombrelibre
(It's not easy being a Run Paul defeatist on Iraq, but a few annoying freepers work at it.)
To: Allegra
” The violence is significantly down all over Iraq. What’s Paul’s leftist-mantra excuse for the huge drop in incidents in Anbar Province? In Baghdad? In Mosul? In Tal Afar? I could go on, but you get my drift.”
I agree that the violence is down all over Iraq but would you care to specifically state why? And down by what measure? Compared to last year, two years ago or what? Are the reasons the same for every area? And at what point do we leave declaring victory?
26 posted on
12/03/2007 4:03:35 PM PST by
JediHal
(DON"T PANIC! (from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson