Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Semi-News: Ex-Supreme Court Justice O'Connor Bashes Pro-Life Advocates
AZCONSERVATIVE ^ | 16 Mar 2006 | John Semmens

Posted on 03/20/2006 9:11:54 PM PST by John Semmens

Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor used a speech at Georgetown University to attack pro-life lawmakers who sided with Terri Schiavo's parents in their efforts to prevent their daughter's euthanasia death. She claimed a Congressional effort to have federal courts review the case was a first step towards a dictatorship.

"We must be ever-vigilant against those who would strong-arm the judiciary in an effort to interfere in ‘end-of-life’ decisions," said O’Connor. "It is the Court’s obligation to protect the right to terminate life unworthy of life. Those who would impede the corurts in this matter are pushing the country down toward dictatorship.”

In related news, Americans have proved extremely consistent in their inconsistent beliefs about abortion. A solid majority feel that Roe v. Wade should be upheld. Most think having an abortion should be a personal choice. But they also think it is murder.

"I mean, it’s not as if they’re murdering a stranger,” said National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARAL) spokeswoman Etta Young in an effort to explain the inconsistency. “People feel families should have the privacy to decide whether to terminate unwanted members.”

(Excerpt) Read more at azconservative.org ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Humor; Politics; Science
KEYWORDS: abortion; euthanasia; naral; sandraoconnor; satire; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 03/20/2006 9:11:56 PM PST by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Good riddance.


2 posted on 03/20/2006 9:23:30 PM PST by T Lady (The Mainstream Media: Public Enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Why Reagan? Why?


3 posted on 03/20/2006 9:32:32 PM PST by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Lady

---"It is the Court’s obligation to protect the right to terminate life unworthy of life. Those who would impede the corurts in this matter are pushing the country down toward dictatorship.”---

Good Lord! We just had a crazy person on the Supreme Court.


4 posted on 03/20/2006 9:41:05 PM PST by claudiustg (Delenda est Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
Yeah, the so-called 'Swing Vote'.

...Perhaps she was swinging from a chandelier or something. As I said earlier, good riddance.
5 posted on 03/20/2006 9:58:12 PM PST by T Lady (The Mainstream Media: Public Enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Bye bye!


6 posted on 03/20/2006 9:59:05 PM PST by GarySpFc (de oppresso liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

"Life unworthy of life" is a phrase right out of Nazi lexicon, and I don't make such statements lightly. Its use by a former Supreme Court Justice [and a MODERATE - yeah, right] is HIGHLY disturbing.


7 posted on 03/20/2006 10:02:19 PM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Lady

The idea that the court will tell us if our life is worth living is horrifying from a philisophical point of view. The idea is basically evil and corrosive of other values.


8 posted on 03/20/2006 10:10:02 PM PST by claudiustg (Delenda est Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

*PING*


9 posted on 03/20/2006 10:11:11 PM PST by T Lady (The Mainstream Media: Public Enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

---"Life unworthy of life" is a phrase right out of Nazi lexicon---

They used that line for the mentally and physically disabled. They went after the Jews on the grounds they were parasitic, anti-life. One wonders what her thoughts might be on that subject. Once you accept the one line of thought, the other tends to follow more easily.


10 posted on 03/20/2006 10:22:52 PM PST by claudiustg (Delenda est Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Mervin Willett

She was talking about "end of life" circumstances, if you'll read what she says.

---"We must be ever-vigilant against those who would strong-arm the judiciary in an effort to interfere in ‘end-of-life’ decisions," said O’Connor. "It is the Court’s obligation to protect the right to terminate life unworthy of life. Those who would impede the corurts in this matter are pushing the country down toward dictatorship.”---

She was talking about Shiavo.

I love this line from Etta Young.

---“People feel families should have the privacy to decide whether to terminate unwanted members.”---

Wow.


12 posted on 03/20/2006 10:56:24 PM PST by claudiustg (Delenda est Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
"It is the Court’s obligation to protect the right to terminate life unworthy of life..."

Ja, wir must protect our right to cleanse ourselves of sie untermenschen! (/sarc)

O'Connor would have been more at home in the SS Rassenprufer than on our Supreme Court.

13 posted on 03/21/2006 2:54:54 PM PST by Ursine_East_Facing_North
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens; 4lifeandliberty; AbsoluteGrace; afraidfortherepublic; Alamo-Girl; anniegetyourgun; ...
NOTE: This article was posted in other threads, but THIS thread has the full unedited quote of O'Connor's. Thank you, John Semmens for posting.

Compare: Edited quote: "'We must be ever-vigilant against those who would strong-arm the judiciary,' she said of the pro-Terri Schiavo lawmakers."

Unedited quote: ""We must be ever-vigilant against those who would strong-arm the judiciary in an effort to interfere in ‘end-of-life’ decisions,' said O’Connor. 'It is the Court’s obligation to protect the right to terminate life unworthy of life. Those who would impede the courts in this matter are pushing the country down toward dictatorship.'"

According to O'Connor, Terri Schindler (let alone millions of babies) was a life UNWORTHY of life!


Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping!

Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping list...

14 posted on 03/21/2006 9:28:22 PM PST by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

Thanks for the ping!


15 posted on 03/21/2006 10:18:58 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Okay, I need a transcript of this, not just a report on what was said. Anybody got one? I have looked and can't find it, but I gotta run for a little while. Any help would be appreciated.


16 posted on 03/22/2006 5:06:33 AM PST by Desert_Girl (A scar is what happens when the world is made flesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

Dang it! Some day I will learn to read the whole thread before I put my foot in my mouth. Sorry.


17 posted on 03/22/2006 5:08:27 AM PST by Desert_Girl (A scar is what happens when the world is made flesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens; cgk

AZconservative is satire, guys.

Mrs VS


18 posted on 03/22/2006 6:07:04 AM PST by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

I mean, I suppose you knew that but boy, it had me going for a minute.

Mrs VS


19 posted on 03/22/2006 6:08:51 AM PST by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4lifeandliberty; AbsoluteGrace; afraidfortherepublic; Alamo-Girl; anniegetyourgun; applex; ...

Semi-Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping!

I was snowed! Sorry for pinging you all to a SATIRE thread. I've been advised this isn't real. I guess what they say about satire is true: the best is based in truth! ;)

20 posted on 03/22/2006 8:26:30 AM PST by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson