Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Corruption of the term 'National Security'
2/18/06 | Souldrift

Posted on 02/18/2006 7:23:51 AM PST by Souldrift

Everyone agrees this is a trying time, and everyone--contrary to George Bush--agrees there actually are people out there trying to harm Americans. Everyone I know, even my most liberal of friends, agrees that there are people attacking us but disagrees about the solution. But in case you missed it, George Bush thinks he's still trying to convince people that Americans are targets:

I understand there’s some in America who say, ‘Well, this can’t be true there are still people willing to attack.’ All I would ask them to do is listen to the words of Osama bin Laden and take him seriously.
Because we've been targeted for attack since 9/11/01 and prior, as in the U.S.S. Cole incident, our country is fighting terrorism in the Middle East. Our government calls it a "war on terror." As I've blogged previously, we should be more careful with our phrasing, as the "war on terror" should actually be the "War on terrorism." Either way, however, the use of the militant term "war" is interesting, as there really is no identifiable country or army fighting us. The emphasis on the term "war" allows us to involve our military and operate under rules of engagement.

One of the rules that gains increased importance during wartime is protection of information classified for reasons of "national security." This phrase is an example of one that can be used as weapons, to isolate those of dissenting viewpoints. It is one thing to conceal operational details of programs which tell the enemy exactly what technologies are being used, and how they work, in our efforts against them. It is another to conceal only vague information which does not provide the enemy anything they do not know already, but which might prompt questions from the media or from the population at large. It is this second category which is most damaging.

Currently there are two battles for secrecy being fought (if not more) in the media. First, we have the release of information regarding the NSA spy program. As I blogged yesterday, Senator DeWine stated matter-of-factly "we don’t want to have any kind of debate about whether it’s constitutional or not constitutional." The administration argues that *Details* about the program may aid our enemies, and to fully debate this would require divulging some of the details. This is valid, which is why the debate was to take place among a limited number of Senators (the Intelligence Committee) which would report back its findings, to hopefully satisfy the rest of Congress and the people.

Earlier, contrary to yesterday's assertion that "of course we're willing to work with the Congress," the White House was arguing that even talking about this program aids the enemy. Honestly, it's asinine to believe that terrorists who can plan and coordinate four planes crashing into multiple targets within an hour in different cities the same morning are NOT aware we can WIRETAP. But here's Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, trying to support this ridiculous argument:

And so, when the director of the CIA says this should really damage our intel capabilities, I would defer to that statement. I think, based on my experience, it is true -- you would assume that the enemy is presuming that we are engaged in some kind of surveillance.

But if they're not reminded about it all the time in the newspapers and in stories, they sometimes forget....And you're amazed at some of the communications that exist. And so when you keep sticking it in their face that we're involved in some kind of surveillance, even if it's unclear in these stories, it can't help but make a difference, I think.

Sorry, not good enough. If we were stating (illustration, people!) "we're using the AT&T VR-59 -2000 to tap into every CO in the American phone system, so that we intercept every phone call when it departs and enters the last-mile, and further......." we'd be giving way too much information. But WE'RE NOT! The American people also know we wiretap, but they assume that due to FISA and the events of Watergate, that wiretapping is conducted with some oversight. Because it is not, the information was leaked to the media by a concerned citizen, who can be considered a whistleblower. The White House is becoming alarmed at the frequency of leaks and is combating them. Some have called this the "most secretive administration in modern history" based on the amount of information it classifies, and this is another example.

Another recent leak where the White House is framing a nearly opposite reaction is the leak of Valerie Plame's identity. In this case, the powers that be in the executive branch were frustrated by her husband's claims against the administration, and they sought to reveal her identity in a plot to discredit him. Recently it has been alleged by the indicted "Scooter" Libby that his superiors authorized him to leak information, and by others that Cheney was ultimately behind the effort.

In this case, though, where the identity of an undercover CIA operative was revealed, it is clear that intelligence-gathering is immediately compromised, as that operative's missions are over and those of her associates (those known to our enemies) are also jeopardized. In fact, their lives may be jeopardized. Yet instead of thoroughly denouncing this behavior, Cheney now argues that he has the authority to declassify information but yet will not confirm whether or not he has done so, only that he has participated in such discussions. This is clearing the brush for defense of Libby -- Libby claims his superiors authorized it, and if the "Superior" in question (his boss, Cheney) has the authority to do so, no harm no foul.

Meanwhile, even though Cheney is arguing he has this power, Libby's defense team is requesting further information on what information the White House has declassified, and the orders given to him to disseminate it. These requests are for a great amount of "classified" information, and the prosecution now argues that Libby is requesting this information--knowing the requests will be denied--only because he thinks it will cause the case to be thrown out. Therefore he's trying to take advantage of the administration's desire to suppress the notion that it used dubious and disproven claims in its case for war against Iraq, and the scandalous means it was willing to employ to make its case, because that information would likely diminish public support for the administration--and therefore infringe upon "national security."

Clearly we have current examples of the administraiton using the defense of classifying information for "national security" selectively to achieve its own ends. The American people cannot stand for this.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: cheney; hateamericafilth; hateamericatrash; hatebush; hatecheney; hatingamerica; kittychow; nationalsecurity; nsa; secrecy; spying; surveillance; troll; vikingkitties; vk; zot; zotme; zotmehard; zotmeharder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: Souldrift
Everyone I know, even my most liberal of friends, agrees that there are people attacking us but disagrees about the solution.

Most of them want to crawl into corner, curl in a little ball and whimper, "Please don't hurt me" in the belief that the terrorist will be so overcome with remorse that they will give them milk and cookies.

Others believe that America is too strong and the fight against the terrorists is not fairly balanced.

Their solution is for as many Americans as possible to die. They actually want less terrorist deaths and more American deaths. So they, either openly or sub rose give aid and comfort to the enemy.

Most of us on planet reality do not consider these actual solutions.

So we believe that they must not understand the danger they are in. For surely no one could be that dense. Thank you for clearly laying out the fact that your communist friends actually are imbeciles studying to be morons... and failing.

41 posted on 02/18/2006 8:41:08 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Have you hugged your accountant today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Souldrift

Ok now I am sticking to the REAL topic. that you are a DEAD TROLL! DEAD!

42 posted on 02/18/2006 8:42:05 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (M.S.M. CREED: "Truth has no substance until we give it permission!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Souldrift
I was taking a cat nap when my beeber went off
        Did you have to disturb me for this?
                              IATZ
 

 

43 posted on 02/18/2006 8:42:29 AM PST by vigilante2 (I'm the proud parent of a soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Thanks for posting your excellent summary of this liberal blogger's spins.


44 posted on 02/18/2006 8:42:32 AM PST by Grampa Dave (The NY Slimes has been committing treason and sedition for decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Souldrift
Image hosted by Photobucket.com

45 posted on 02/18/2006 8:45:45 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Souldrift
Don't tell me you think the Clinton indictment was valid and the Libby one not?

Who's saying the Libby indictment isn't valid? It hasn't gone to trial yet, so it remains to be seen.

46 posted on 02/18/2006 8:47:21 AM PST by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: steveegg

Darken the skies with the Viking Kitties!

Then brighten with lightning and mushroom clouds.

Sounds like a plan! This leftwing blog/pimp pos has been zapped/zotted/seared/charbroiled!


47 posted on 02/18/2006 8:53:03 AM PST by Grampa Dave (The NY Slimes has been committing treason and sedition for decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
Perfect Zot for this left wing blog pimp pos:


48 posted on 02/18/2006 8:55:45 AM PST by Grampa Dave (The NY Slimes has been committing treason and sedition for decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

This one just meandered by...

49 posted on 02/18/2006 8:56:20 AM PST by ARealMothersSonForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Souldrift

50 posted on 02/18/2006 8:59:08 AM PST by ARealMothersSonForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

We need one of our graphic arts people to replace the words kill you with Zot You!


51 posted on 02/18/2006 9:00:29 AM PST by Grampa Dave (The NY Slimes has been committing treason and sedition for decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

That was great....keep them coming (I hope!)


52 posted on 02/18/2006 9:00:42 AM PST by Prost1 (Sandy Berger can steal, Clinton can cheat, but Bush can't listen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Souldrift; sure_fine

IATZ (In After The ZOT!)

Darn it.


53 posted on 02/18/2006 9:17:33 AM PST by butternut_squash_bisque (Borders, Language, Culture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
"Time to page the paving crew to handle this little speed bump on the road to truth."


54 posted on 02/18/2006 9:18:18 AM PST by DocRock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Image hosting by Photobucket
55 posted on 02/18/2006 9:22:05 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DocRock

Thank you DocRock!

What a fun thread this has become!

Freepers have the greatest sense of humor and Schadenfreude when left wing moles expose themselves as trolls! Zotting brings about a very addicting level of Schadenfreude.


56 posted on 02/18/2006 9:27:27 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Visit Free Republic to enjoy shameless Schadenfreude as the lies of liberals are exposed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Thanks, but I can't read the ZOT very well.


57 posted on 02/18/2006 9:38:02 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Visit Free Republic to enjoy shameless Schadenfreude as the lies of liberals are exposed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

Muzza been a White Horse Souse!!


58 posted on 02/18/2006 10:10:37 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
Good one...


59 posted on 02/18/2006 10:14:42 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Souldrift

Every single troll is now an ENEMY OF THE REPUBLIC!

60 posted on 02/18/2006 11:58:18 AM PST by Paul_Denton (Every single troll is now an enemy of the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson