Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUmmie FUnnies 06-03-05 ("Are we really going to let the GOP talk us into running Hillary?")
DUmmie FUnnies ^ | June 3, 2005 | DUmmies and PJ-Comix

Posted on 06/03/2005 7:16:14 AM PDT by PJ-Comix

Has Andy Stephenson entered a DUmmieland Witness Protection Program? For the past few days, ever since Andy began publicly harassing the relatives of Bev Harris by posting their names and personal information about them, Scamdy has DISAPPEARED. In fact ALL MENTION in Dummieland about Scamdy’s “pancreatic cancer” has disappeared and if any there are so bold as to post any reference to Scamdy, Skinner immediately sends it down the Memory Pitt. As to Pied Piper Pitt, following his much ballyhooed posting of documents “proving” that Scamdy did indeed have pancreatic cancer, he has retracted his head into his turtle shell and REFUSES to further comment about those documents. One big reason is that those documents Pitt posted accurately predicted in an April 27 FAX that Scamdy would have surgery during the week of May 23 even though at the time of the FAX the surgery was still scheduled for May 10 and wasn’t rescheduled until almost 2 weeks after the FAX was sent. Right now the DUmmies are hoping that the whole Andy Stephenson Situation (as Skinner called it) would just go away. Unfortunately for Dummieland, the DUmmie FUnnies will STILL shine the light on this scandal which demonstrates what a bunch of dim-witted gullible fools the DUmmies were. Until Scamdy or Skinner or Pitt makes a full public confession (or are indicted) the DUmmie FUnnies will consistently hammer the DUmmies on this subject in all future DUmmie FUnnies. This edition of the DUmmie FUnnies based on a DUmmie THREAD titled, “Are we really going to let the GOP talk us into running Hillary?” will continue smoking out the DUmmies on this point. As usual the DUmmie postings still in Scamdy Denial are in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, about to reveal some inside political info he recently received, is in the [brackets]:

Are we really going to let the GOP talk us into running Hillary?

[Consider it payback for talking us into nominating Bob Dole in 1996. Bob Dole didn’t so much run to win as to merely build up his resume. Somehow this latter seemed very important to Dole in his future career of doing Penile Erectile Dysfunction commercials on TV. At least we have no doubt that Dole suffered from this problem (no one admits to this condition unless they really had it) but we STILL don’t know what sort of medical problem Andy Stephenson had although it was almost certainly NOT pancreatic cancer.]

I think she would be an awful candidate. She's not that great a speaker, clearly not at all concerned about corporate power, posturing more and more "moderate" all of the time. The Senate alone has at least a dozen other Democrats who would make better candidates than her.

[All the more reason why Karl Rove has designated her as your ’08 nominee.]

But the GOP is licking its fetid chops, man. They can just about taste the hatefest they would enjoy if she were running. There would be no holds barred on the calumny and slander that they would rain down on her.

[Karl Rove has put out a directive to NOT accuse Hillary of faking a pancreatic cancer operation. Something like that is OFF-LIMITS.]

They are walking a fine line, though. Having demonized her for more than 10 years now, they need to talk Democrats into getting her through the primaries, so they have to cool it down a bit and talk about what a great potential candidate she would be. David Broder put up a column not too long ago just like that.

[Psst! Why do you think the Bushes and Bill Clinton are acting like buddies now? It’s all part of the Rovian Master Plan.]

But they can't stop talking about her. Both Hannity & Colmes and Bill O'Rodent had segments on her Tuesday night. What other Democratic politician gets so much attention from those loons?

[Kerry recently got a flurry of press attention when he FINALLY signed his Form 180 to release his military records to the public. Yes, he FINALLY signed Form 180 and now we are waiting for him to FINALLY drop that signed form in the mail.]

Thinking "well, if the GOP hates her so much, they must be afraid of her, therefore she would be a great candidate" is the trap the Democrats cannot, must not, walk into. Step away. This will be the most important national IQ test for the Democrats in a long time.

[I am SO CONFIDENT of the low DUmmie IQ that I can flat out state the Rovian Game Plan without the slightest fear that you DUmmies can do anything about it. Hey! If you were DUmb enough to send in your money to Andy Stephenson for a phony pancreatic cancer operation then you certainly will easily be manipulated by Karl Rove despite advance warning.]

Having said all that, I'd vote for her in a heartbeat next to any GOP candidate. But please Lahd, and all my fellow Democrats, please don't let it come to that.

[It WILL come to it. And now to announce the ULTIMATE DUmmie nightmare, DUmmie ProfessorPlum. Not only is Karl Rove saddling you with Hillary but the GOP candidate for ’08 has already been decided upon---Dick Cheney. You think that Bob Woodward story about Cheney being drafted in ’08 was just idle speculation? A Republican Deep Throat handed that story to Woodward to pass along. The fact is if Cheney’s doctors give him the go-ahead and IF Cheney is convinced there is a groundswell of support for him, he WILL run in ’08. Look forward to a CONTINUATION of the Bush policies following the next election.]

condi vs. mccain. rove attacks once again.

[Nope. Cheney vs McCain=Cheney Winner. Rove STRIKES again!]

Let them run their nutcase ... and we should pick someone sensible. I like HC, but she simply has no chance for victory. All the general polls do not change the fact that swing state voters will not bite.

[Nutcase McCain might run but he CAN’T win against Cheney. “President Cheney.” Prepare for those words, DUmmies.]

If the Democratic Party runs Hillary ( a pro-war neodem), it deserves to lose. But we don't. If we can't get the party to wake up, the real Democrats ought to put together their own ticket with real Democrats.

[Hillary WILL be your losing candidate. Live with it.]

the media and GOP dictated who our candidate would be and those fine tuned political machines in Iowa and New Hampshire went for it hook, line and sinker. *cough*assholes*cough* It's been interesting to watch the same exact process being put into motion yet again.

[Interesting and FUnnie to see the Democrats falling for it ONCE AGAIN. ’08 will be a DOUBLE WHAMMIE for you folks. Hillary as your losing nominee and Cheney as OUR President.]

Even if she doesn't run, the GOP will make money on the RW's fear that she will. That's why we're hearing so much about her right now.

[All part of the Vast Rovian Storm. Hillary’s name will raise TONS of money. However, she WILL be your nominee. Make no mistake about that. So Rove has said. So let it be done.]

I guess that now, they want to tout her as the be-all of candidates for Dems in 08. We need someone who can WIN and I'm not sure Hillary can - which is why I think they are trying to ram her down our collective throats. And of course, they've subcontraced the MSM to help them do it.

[Choke on the Hillary in your collective throats!]

Sad to say, I don't like her enough to defend her when the hate fest revs in gear. And, I would never vote for either.

[HILLARY vs CHENEY = GOP LANDSLIDE]

We need her but we are too goddam stupid to elect her, so we don't deserve her.

[Hillary is just TOO GOOD for us. We don’t deserve her. Also we don’t deserve that other candidate for sainthood---Andy Stephenson.]

actually, technically, she is a horrendous speaker that has never squelched the "ah" impulse.

[Ah. You know, Hillary, um, does seem to, you know, have that, ah, problem.]

What if it was MCCain vs Clark. That would be interesting.

[About as realistic as Andy Stephenson’s pancreatic cancer. 2008 will be Hillary vs Cheney. Count on it.]


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: andyscam; andystephenson; dummies; hillary2008; hillaryclinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,201-1,211 next last
To: PJ-Comix
PJ,

You've been doing yeoman's work with the DUmmie Funnies for a year (give or take). And yet, this is the first time that the DUmmies have hit on the truth.

On the theory that even a blind pig can find an occasional acorn, these DU folks have concluded that Hillary! would be a drug on the market as a candidate for President in 2008. The analysis is correct, that she is too weak as a candidate. It is also correct that Hillary! as a candidate would be red meat in fund-raising for the Republicans.

DU is correct to surmise that Karl Rove might have picked Hillary! as their candidate. He didn't do so, but this is one excessive DU belief for which one can see the logic. LOL.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "60 Million Frenchmen Can't be Wrong"

81 posted on 06/03/2005 12:43:31 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (For copies of my speech, "Dealing with Outlaw Judges," please Freepmail me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beandog

"Well, according to DUmmy PI some of us are going to jail"

These guys are absolutely nuts if they think anyone in their right mind believes they can go to jail for questioning Andy. What are they going to go to jail for?


82 posted on 06/03/2005 12:47:49 PM PDT by imskylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: imskylark

He hasn't bothered to read us or rights yet, but he claims he's making $75 an hour plus overtime. Hey, whatever blows his dress up.


83 posted on 06/03/2005 12:52:34 PM PDT by beandog (The only time I was wrong was the time I thought I was wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: beandog

Who is Steve Nesbitt??


84 posted on 06/03/2005 12:55:15 PM PDT by ReeWalker (Life isn't fair...GET USED TO IT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ReeWalker

I tried googling the name but it didn't come up with anything that might show who this is. I'm sure it's some kind of clue but my brain is too tired today to figure it out. I'm sure some other FReeper will come up with something.

In the meantime, I think we should just enjoy the show. LOL


85 posted on 06/03/2005 12:57:13 PM PDT by beandog (The only time I was wrong was the time I thought I was wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason; commonguymd; eyespysomething; Repub4bush; volvox; mozrock; ShorelineMike; ...
DUMMIE ALERT!


DUMMIE ALERT!


HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF!


THOSE WHO FORGET THE PAST DOOMED TO MAKE SAME MISTAKES OVER AND OVER AGAIN!


KNOWLEDGE OF HISTORY AMONG ANDYITES ABYSMAL!


Image hosted by Photobucket.com


I was thinking about this last night, and the parallels with the second world war are oh-so-painfully obvious, oh-so-patently clear.

Of course the contemporary DUmmieland is "Germany," temporarily under the heel of the oppressive Andyites, who are running amok, wreaking havoc, doing anything they wish to do.

And then there are a couple of individuals who have been under devastating attack from Germany; they have been slandered, vilified, muddied, and are fighting for their mere survival--these are "England."

And then there are those who have truly suffered agonizing ordeals, their lives being considerably amputated by the afflictions of those close to them, and who are bothered that they are being mocked by the Andyites--these are "Russia," minus the commissars.

And also there are those who have been ostracized, even expelled, from their own homes, the left, or the liberals, who are bothered by the shenanigans of the "do as I say not as I do" Andyites--these are the Polish pilots, the Norwegian sailors, the Free French, valiantly trying to take back their homeland.

And finally, there is "America," who seeks to make the world a better and safer place for the weak, the vulnerable, the innocent, the cheated.

All engaged in this war with differing motives, but one unified goal.

86 posted on 06/03/2005 1:03:08 PM PDT by franksolich (at wits' ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

................................... "I"


.................................... "am"


................................... "not"


..................................... "gay!"

87 posted on 06/03/2005 1:07:34 PM PDT by Roscoe Karns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: beandog

I think this is the Steve-last comment.

http://blog.pdamerica.org/?p=23#comments

He supposedly went and posted his accusations on the numerous blogs that were collecting for Andy. I have seen comments from the Andylites addressing/slamming him on other sites. Don't remember which ones, though.


88 posted on 06/03/2005 1:08:49 PM PDT by CaliGirl-R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: beandog

"He hasn't bothered to read us or rights yet, but he claims he's making $75 an hour plus overtime. Hey, whatever blows his dress up."

I think it is just messing around. No one is THAT stupid.


89 posted on 06/03/2005 1:11:11 PM PDT by imskylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
Because Andy&Friends don't want anyone but a Progressive doofus like WillPitt to cover the story.

Will Pitt is anything but "progressive."

90 posted on 06/03/2005 1:12:53 PM PDT by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: beandog

Steve might even be "SomethingsGottaGive" over at Misty's site. I think that screen name was a DUer.


91 posted on 06/03/2005 1:13:20 PM PDT by CaliGirl-R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
If the Dummies and their allies get a third party candidate to split the Hillary vote that candidate's life will be in mortal danger.

Hillary won't just run PR ops against them, she will hire hit men.

The Dummies, as usual, have absolutely no idea who are they are dealing with here.
92 posted on 06/03/2005 1:15:04 PM PDT by cgbg (When do I wake up from this socialist nightmare?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReeWalker

I think Steve Nesbitt is what the DUmmie "PrivateI" claims is AndyScam's/SomethingsGotaGive's real name.


93 posted on 06/03/2005 1:16:22 PM PDT by Chappaquiddick Crawdad ("E unum pluribus"? Perhaps you meant "ex uno plures", or is that "stultus sum"? hmmm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Misty Memory
Send me the IP of this idiot that claims he's a PI. We'll see some real fun come down! email me at jurroppi1 Boy, this guy is a boob!
94 posted on 06/03/2005 1:24:18 PM PDT by jurroppi1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
I read that story about the cancer fraud in the Salt Lake Tribune two weeks ago when I was there on business....made me think of nothing but Andy scam and the DUmmies....one born every minute....
95 posted on 06/03/2005 1:27:21 PM PDT by Getsmart64 (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chappaquiddick Crawdad
Oh, man.

"Disgruntled" is over in the other conservative web-site, discussing culinary arts.....apparently trying to establish some bona fides as authentic, when we already figured out a long time ago that "Disgruntled" is simply a tool, a mouthpiece, of the Andyites.

The Andyites must think we're really stupid, or something.

Oh, well.....

96 posted on 06/03/2005 1:31:50 PM PDT by franksolich (at wits' ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82
Note that I capitalized Progressive. No they aren't but that is what they call themselves.
97 posted on 06/03/2005 1:31:59 PM PDT by MisterRepublican ("First of all, I'm not going to apologize for asking these questions."-William Rivers Pitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: beandog
When you get back, check out the new andyscam thread. We've got a guy claiming to be a PI hired to watch somebody (not clear who).

Link?

98 posted on 06/03/2005 1:33:08 PM PDT by Getsmart64 (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Getsmart64

http://mistymemory.forumsplace.com/message-4-0-asc-30.html


99 posted on 06/03/2005 1:37:06 PM PDT by ReeWalker (Life isn't fair...GET USED TO IT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: ReeWalker; All

For some reason, I can't log in again at Misty's forum.

Can one of you post this for the "PI"? It's Michigan state law regarding impersonating a Private Investigator.

http://www.legislature.mi.gov/mileg.asp?page=getObject&objName=mcl-338-823&highlight=

PRIVATE DETECTIVE LICENSE ACT (EXCERPT)
Act 285 of 1965


338.823 License required; violation; penalty.

Sec. 3.

(1) A person, firm, partnership, company, limited liability company, or corporation shall not engage in the business of private detective or investigator for hire, fee or reward, and shall not advertise his or her business to be that of detective or of a detective agency without first obtaining a license from the department.

(2) A person, firm, partnership, company, limited liability company, or corporation shall not engage in the business of furnishing or supplying, for hire and reward, information as to the personal character of any person or firm, or as to the character or kind of business and occupation of any person, firm, partnership, company, limited liability company, or corporation and shall not own, conduct, or maintain a bureau or agency for the purposes described in this subsection except as to the financial rating of persons, firms, partnerships, companies, limited liability companies, or corporations without having first obtained a license from the department.

(3) A person violating this section is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 4 years or by a fine of not more than $5,000.00, or both.


History: 1965, Act 285, Imd. Eff. July 22, 1965 ;-- Am. 1974, Act 114, Eff. July 1, 1974 ;-- Am. 2002, Act 474, Eff. Oct. 1, 2002


© 2004 Legislative Council, State of Michigan


100 posted on 06/03/2005 1:40:49 PM PDT by KJC1 (Somebody shook up the Ants!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,201-1,211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson