Could not agree more!
I fear for the life my grandchildren will face in America.
bttt
Great Post. I have believe this for a number of years. A good read is Dave Hunts a "Cup of Trembling". He tells it like it really is.
Great post .
I'll read this later. You don't need to use bold-face when you're using a large font. It's more difficult to read bold-face and your large font made your point just fine.
If only the moderate muslims, en masse, had stepped up to the plate after 9-11 and condemned the fanatic extremists. If only....but, there was only cheering in the middle east and silence from them in the west.
If there is another 9-11 in the USA....we will go to martial law and mass deportation... regardless of the ACLU. The citizenry must be protected.
You said a lot, all of it true and well worth reading, but that bold font is hard on the eyes. Perhaps next time, you might just use normal font and paragraphs?
There's more than one way to skin this Islamic cat. Declaring all out war on Islam makes it harder to pick off the real bad guys...the ones who pose a clear and present danger. It's like poking a stick in a hornet nest. If you can sneak up on them at nightfall and not get stung, isn't that better? Deception can be your friend, and GW is a pretty good poker player. So rather than take on the whole crowd at once, we're giving those who'll listen a chance to change. That's what Iraq is partially about. The rest is geography, to box in the rest of the axis of evil.
There are times when it's almost beyond bearing to hear or see the latest Muslim atrocity, but we have to be smarter than they are and focus on the objective. We isolate countries that fuel this war, put them out of business one way or another, and without support, Muslim maniacs have nowhere to go, nowhere to train, live, or survive. But if we let emotion determine our actions, we're doing just what Islamofascists want, and it's a good way to lose. That said, I'm with you all the way. But we hold all the cards, remember. Why give this scum even the slightest advantage?
As long as George W. Bush is reelected in November, then we have a chance. The current policy is to kill those Islamists who we want to kill, and get those Muslims who don't want to be killed to help us.
If John F'n Kerry gets elected, we will surely all die.
But I do agree that Islam is mired in the 7th century.
Isn't this the type of appeasement we accuse other countries of practicing?
When the enemy comes in like a flood, a standard shall be thrown up against him. We need to be praying HARD right now that this standard will be thrown up, because we need more than natural means to defeat this enemy. - Yes, it is serious business.
Wow a screamer. Susan Estrich has nothing on you.
Islam should be defined as a subversive organization, perhaps a criminal enterprise, and treated accordingly.
for later reading
join my 10% tax on all muslims to pay for world terrorism movement!
The influential Washington-based Center for Security Police recently unveiled a groundbreaking report entitled, "Terrorism Investments of the 50 States." This report analyzes the investment portfolios of America's leading public pension funds. The key finding of the report is that America's 87 largest and most influential pension systems invest some $200 billion in companies that provide revenues, advanced technology, equipment and moral cover to governments that enable terrorism. (This detailed report and related materials can be obtained at www.DivestTerror.org.)
To be sure, there is nothing illegal about investing in any of the roughly 400 companies that partner with our enemies' friends. Nor is it illegal for such companies to do business with terrorist-sponsoring regimes. Whether the law prohibits such activities or not, however, we believe most Americans will agree with us that they are wrong â?" wrong morally, wrong strategically and wrong financially.
Consequently, DivestTerror.org offers a "how-to" manual showing ways in which investors, taxpayers and other citizens can bring pressure to bear to convert this $200 billion investment into leverage that can be used to help defeat terrorism. Reduced to its essence, the idea is this: By divesting the stock of these companies, public pension systems, university endowments and even individual investors can send a powerful message to the companies that provide life-support to many of the planet's most dangerous regimes. You can choose to continue to partner with rogue state regimes that aid and abet terrorism. Or you can do business with American investors and capital markets. But you can no longer do both.
As the DivestTerror.org website makes clear, divestment campaigns have already proven to be highly effective instruments. In fact, over the last twenty years, institutional and private investors have repeatedly used their financial leverage to initiate social change. For instance, these efforts have been used to bring pressure on stocks of companies involved in tobacco, alcohol, gambling, guns and environmentally insensitive behavior. Arguably, the best-known example to date was the shareholder activism that used divestment to force the apartheid government of South Africa to abandon its heinous apartheid policy. Subsequently, that government was forced to surrender power.
By applying this model to companies doing business in terrorist-sponsoring states, we hope to achieve a success no less momentous than that accomplished in South Africa. All it will take is for Americans like you to feel empowered to play a role in the war on terror, to make known your views against investment in terrorist-sponsoring states and to use tools like those provided by DivestTerror.org to target and maximize the effectiveness of your activism. Please visit this informative and useful site and to join in the campaign it is now waging to defeat those who threaten not only our lives, but those of our children and grandchildren, as well.