Posted on 02/23/2010 8:02:16 AM PST by butterdezillion
I've updated my blog to include the e-mail from Janice Okubo confirming that they assign birth certificate numbers in the state registrar's office and the day they do that is the "Date filed by state registrar".
The pertinent portion from Okubo's e-mail:
In regards to the terms date accepted and date filed on a Hawaii birth certificate, the department has no records that define these terms. Historically, the terms Date accepted by the State Registrar and Date filed by the State Registrar referred to the date a record was received in a Department of Health office (on the island of Oahu or on the neighbor islands of Kauai, Hawaii, Maui, Molokai, or Lanai), and the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office located on the island of Oahu) respectively.
MY SUMMARY: As you can see, Okubo said that the Date filed by the State Registrar is the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office).
There are no pre-numbered certificates. A certificate given a certificate number on Aug 8th (Obamas Factcheck COLB) would not be given a later number than a certificate given a number on Aug 11th (the Nordyke certificates).
There is no way that both the date filed and the certificate number can be correct on the Factcheck COLB. The COLB is thus proven to be a forgery.
If you could check with her that would be awesome. Thank you.
Was anybody else here born in Hawaii? What I’m looking for is the name of the hospital and the date that the certificate was accepted by local and/or state registrar.
Giving a file number is the mark that the record has been accepted. Whatever processing had to be done on it is done by that point.
How could a BC that completed the process and received its number on August 8th be given a later number than a BC that completed its process and received a number on August 11th?
Piles have nothing to do with it. The number is the state registrar’s confirmation that the record is considered valid. Giving a number is the last step of the process.
I would imagine that for most birth certificates, filled out at the hospital, “processing” would amount to a quick glance and then stamping with the number stamp. Maybe bgill can comment on that, although what happened at the hospital or county level would be a bit different than at the state registrar’s office.
The pattern that seems to have been true for Kapiolani - where Obama now says he was born (as opposed to the earlier claim that it was at Queens) - is that the BC’s were collected for a week and then on Friday the doctors signed the certificates, the (deputized) local registrar at the hospital signed the certificates, and then all that week’s certificates were transmitted to the state DOH office - as required to be done weekly by Section 8 of “Public Health Regulations”, Chapter 8. The certificates were signed, delivered, and numbered on Fridays, for Kapiolani.
Doing it weekly makes sense since the requirement was that births be reported within 7 days. It would have made an orderly process.
It’s more than nice. It’s a standard to live by.
Standards, of course, must be backed up with action, but first must come a good attitude. Your mindset apparently is to just give up.
I hoped, by sending you the Burke quote, that you might re-think and begin, along with the rest of us, to search for ways to solve the problem.
When titling cars, each title clerk is given a set of tag numbers to work from. And yes, the vehicle didn’t get a tag # until all of the paperwork was completed. However, there are multiple clerks titling cars. One clear might get 10000 - 10025 and another clerk might get 10026 - 10050.
You don’t seem to understand how absolutely manual processing government records of any kind was in 1961.
That's exactly correct. Getting him exposed as a usurper would undoubtedly bring down many of those you mention and possibly more and would be the most direct way to "nip" this crap in the "bud" so to speak. Go straight to the source to stop it.
Let's face it, so many people thought the health care legislation was buried. Yet, here we are...STILL fighting against it. They will try and rham that through with 51 votes. Many of them don't care if they get re-elected. Some have already said they are not going to run again. This is their "golden" opportunity that their movement has been waiting for, for generations and they will not readily pass on their chance to implement their socialist ideology.
And of course, there's the bottom line issue (above and beyond party politics) of trying to protect and defend the Constitution.
When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdoms dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.s children.http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html
It can't. Of course not. Yet, right there, on his campaign web site F.T.S., it's stated that a foreign government "governed" Barry from birth and the reason it did, was that Barry inherited that foreign citizenship by way of his foreign national father (no matter where he was born).
How, then, could he possibly be a "Natural Born Citizen" of the U.S.?
Barry Soetoro, the divided citizen at birth!
http://www.jeffersonsrebels.blogspot.com
Furthermore: Hawaii's Territorial Law, Chapter 57 - "VITAL STATISTICS, I", shown beginning pg 23 of 29, (the law in effect in 1961) allowed baby's born anywhere in the world to be eligible to apply for a Hawaii birth certificate based on the word of 1 relative. That is how a foreign born baby could get a HI BC on record, which in turn generates the "birth announcements" in the newspapers.
Sure thing. Technically speaking the Hospital is listed as: “Kaiser Foundation Hospital”
Thank You!
A Very Good and Well Thought Out Response!
(May I steal it .. LOL) <— just kidding
Mark for later reading. Butterdezillion you’re amazing and a FR treasure(already). It’s always a joy to read your posts.
And it is my personal belief that the vast majority of elected Republicans either already know or suspect, and are complicit in the cover up.
That being said, this is excellent detective work! This is what the “state run media” was supposed to do. The Founding Fathers would probably round up many of them for treason!
“We could get a certified copy of a BC saying Nobama was born on Mars and it would not matter. No one would do a thing about it. No one would even having standing. It just doesnt matter now.”
Now that’s too cynical. No. There would be insurrection, much in the military. SCOTUS would be petitioned immediately and would hear immediately and rule against ozer0. ozer0 would be deposed and Biden rushed in inside a few HOURS.
You are WAAAYY TOOO CYNICAL.
When titling cars, each title clerk is given a set of tag numbers to work from. And yes, the vehicle didnt get a tag # until all of the paperwork was completed. However, there are multiple clerks titling cars. One clear might get 10000 - 10025 and another clerk might get 10026 - 10050.
You dont seem to understand how absolutely manual processing government records of any kind was in 1961.
Unless you fully understand the exact process that the registrar’s office clerks used to process birth certificates in 1961, you simply can’t say with certainty that the date and certificate number combination are impossible.
It is likely that multiple clerks processed those records and it has been proved that the babies were not born on the same day and the certificates not filed on the same day. It is even more likely that different clerks processed the certificates. And if each clerk was assigned a particular numerical set of cert numbers to use in processing the records, it is even more likely that the cert numbers would be significantly out of whack.
The DOH manually stamps the birth certificates they are given. There are no pre-numbered piles. It doesn’t equate with what you’re saying about tags where each clerk has their own pile of tags.
You could say that clerk #1 gets to stamp certs #1-100 and clerk #2 gets to stamp certs #101-200. But the range that one clerk uses would have to be pretty large to account for 3 days’ difference. The difference between the Factcheck number and the Nordyke number is 3.
It doesn’t make sense.
Name |
Location of Birth |
Birth Cert # |
(Day) Date/Time Born |
Date of Signature of Parent or Other Informant |
(Day) Date Accepted by Local Reg. |
Diff bet Date born & Accepted by Local Reg. |
Barack Hussein Obama |
Kapiolani Medical Center |
151-61-10641 |
Aug. 4, 1961 7:24 pm |
unknown |
* Aug. 8, 1961 |
4 days |
Susan Elizabeth Nordyke |
Kapiolani Medical Center |
151-61-10637 |
Aug. 5, 1961 2:12 pm |
Aug 8, 1961 |
Aug 11, 1961 |
6 days |
Grethen Carter Nordyke |
Kapiolani Medical Center |
151-61-10638 |
Aug. 5, 1961 2:17 pm |
Aug 8, 1961 |
Aug 11, 1961 |
6 days |
|
* Note: Obamas Certification states Date Filed by (State) Registrar instead of Date Accepted by Registrar |
Take a look at the Nordyke long form birth certs:
http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/dailypix/2009/Jul/28/M1139416728.GIF
The Nordyke births were signed by the attending physician on Aug 11th, and then subsequently filed and given their file numbers on Aug 11, 1961. Paperwork did not just sit and pile up and these 2 certs from the same week prove it.
So your theory of let the pile accrue thus why Obama’s number could be later than that of the Nordyke twins is absolutely ‘conspiracy theory’ in your own mind and that of the obots.
‘0’bamby has some explaining to do & his original birth cert should be released immediately based on the information in the Nordyke birth certs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.