Replies

http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_3.jpg
BR>

Nordyle Long Form: http://nocompromisemedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/090728birthcert.gif

What does this mean? If Obama's birth was registered on August 8 1969 the Certificate number: 151 1961 010641 would have come before the Nordyke twins which was registered on Aug 11th 1961. The Nordyke BC shows a certificate number of: 151 61 10637. You can I think discount the difference between 61 and 1961 because MY Long form has a 69 there and a 1969 on the Computer printed COLB. Same PERHAPS with the first 0 in the third set of numbers (010641 and 10637). On MY Documents, that third set of numbers is identical, both are 6 digits long. Take that for what it is worth, it raises my eyebrow, but not that far.

Now what Butter is saying here is that is Obamas birth was accepted by the state and FILED on August 8, his Certificate number would have come BEFORE the Nordyke BC which was accepted and FILED 3 days LATER.

Obama Born Aug 4 Filed Aug 8 Cert #010641 Nordyke Born Aug 5 Filed Aug 11 Cert #10637 Obama's filed BEFORE Nordyke and given a certification number on that day (Aug 8)... has a Cert number AFTER Nordyke which was given a Cert # that is lower, three days later (Aug 11)?

If the FILED day is the day that the state issues a certification number onto a record, then it is impossible that the number on Obama's supposed COLB is correct. If it WERE, then his number would have come BEFORE the Nordyke BC, because the state issues the numbers in order in the way they are received.

Nordyke can't have a number that falls before the date it was filed, or Obama's can't have one that falls after Nordyke. The numbers do not jive. A =/= B

When titling cars, each title clerk is given a set of tag numbers to work from. And yes, the vehicle didn’t get a tag # until all of the paperwork was completed. However, there are multiple clerks titling cars. One clear might get 10000 - 10025 and another clerk might get 10026 - 10050.

You don’t seem to understand how absolutely manual processing government records of any kind was in 1961.

Unless you fully understand the exact process that the registrar’s office clerks used to process birth certificates in 1961, you simply can’t say with certainty that the date and certificate number combination are impossible.

It is likely that multiple clerks processed those records and it has been proved that the babies were not born on the same day and the certificates not filed on the same day. It is even more likely that different clerks processed the certificates. And if each clerk was assigned a particular numerical set of cert numbers to use in processing the records, it is even more likely that the cert numbers would be significantly out of whack.

Danae: If the FILED day is the day that the state issues a certification number onto a record, then it is impossible that the number on Obama's supposed COLB is correct. If it WERE, then his number would have come BEFORE the Nordyke BC, because the state issues the numbers in order in the way they are received.

BuuckT, your messiah is screwed and tattooed. Can you say forgery?

If it WERE, then his number would have come BEFORE the Nordyke BC, because the state issues the numbers in order in the way they are received.

Right. And as we know, state clerks always receive certificates in the same order as the births. Papers never get shuffled around in a pile, and they never get to the clerk out of order. It's impossible, because hospital staff obviously don't have anything better to do with their than to make sure piles of papers are in exactly the correct order before they send them to the registrar. /sarcasm