Posted on 02/23/2010 8:02:16 AM PST by butterdezillion
I've updated my blog to include the e-mail from Janice Okubo confirming that they assign birth certificate numbers in the state registrar's office and the day they do that is the "Date filed by state registrar".
The pertinent portion from Okubo's e-mail:
In regards to the terms “date accepted” and “date filed” on a Hawaii birth certificate, the department has no records that define these terms. Historically, the terms “Date accepted by the State Registrar” and “Date filed by the State Registrar” referred to the date a record was received in a Department of Health office (on the island of O’ahu or on the neighbor islands of Kaua’i, Hawai’i, Maui, Moloka’i, or Lana’i), and the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office located on the island of O’ahu) respectively.
MY SUMMARY: As you can see, Okubo said that the “Date filed by the State Registrar” is the date a file number was placed on a record (only done in the main office).
There are no pre-numbered certificates. A certificate given a certificate number on Aug 8th (Obama’s Factcheck COLB) would not be given a later number than a certificate given a number on Aug 11th (the Nordyke certificates).
There is no way that both the date filed and the certificate number can be correct on the Factcheck COLB. The COLB is thus proven to be a forgery.
“Easy way to answer that question.
“Buy it, take the crappy JPG from Orly and see if it can produce the same level of resolution and quality as the TIF image.”
I notice that you have declined to deny that it may be possible to use image resolution enhancement software to double the JPEG resolution of Orly’s image, take a picture of it as a TIF file and then falsely claim that only you could possibly have the much higher resolution original.
Per Topaz promo:
“With Topaz Vivacity, you can: ...(5) enlarge images 2X or more and still maintain visual clarity...”
I’m not saying that you did this, but that it could have been done. What folks with enough money or access to intelligence resources can do with image enhancement is amazing, after all.
They all understand that. They just don’t give a s*** and hope everything sealed/hidden/forged stays hidden.
| according to Gateway Pundit, you’re the one who brought down Free Republic this morning? Jeez louise! I take some time off to relax for the day, only to turn on the computer this evening and find that all hell's broken loose. browardchad, before I answer ... and forgive me for asking ... but:
Did you attend a luncheon with Jim Robinson?
|
Darn you BP! I spit tea everywhere!
I’ll check on that - it has been quite a while and it was a very long and confusing thread so my memory could certainly be faulty. Even if yours was filed by Orly and was filed prior to the other, the Smith document is the important one for the reasons I stated above. However, if what you say is true, then I have attributed motives to you that you did not have when you created the document. If that is the case, I apologize. Will be back to you after I find the answers.
;)
As of now
DOH indirectly confirms: Factcheck COLB date filed and certificate number impossible
02/23/2010 8:02:16 AM PST · by butterdezillion
3,324 replies
25,244+ views
Interesting article about Hawaii DOH blocking Public Records requests:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306351/posts?page=27#27
This was Smith's document. And look who was there to make sure everyone knew - our very own "woofie".
So now what?
If there is, PLEASE ping me to it......
Someone sure knows a lot for being such a noob.
OK, I think the correct information is that Orly posted this document on her site before she filed it so you are correct about the actual date it was filed in the court.
Lucas Smith explains this way:
“Orly Taitz filed the CPGH 1961 Mombasa British Protectorate of Kenya Barack Obama certificate of birth on September 4th, 2009. This CPGH certificate of birth is the one that I procured in Kenya. I went public with story around the end of June 2009 (I think June 26th).
The other birth certificate that “KenyanBCPunkster” claims that he created is the one the Orly claims that she got from Israel. And when I say Israel I mean that she (Orly) told us people that were in her “inner circle” that she was given the document by MOSSAD (the Israeli equivalent of the CIA or the British MI5/MI6).
My personal opinion is that Orly didn’t receive anything from MOSSAD. My personal opinion is that Orly’s MOSSAD document is a fake. Whether this “KenyanBCPunkster” was the guy that forged I have no idea and no opinion whatsoever.
All I can tell you is that I went public on the Internet in the last week of June 2009 (I think the 26th day of June). This was long before Orly’s MOSSAD (Israel) document showed up in the early morning hours of August 2, 2009. Before that there was no MOSSAD document.”
Do you have a link that shows when Orly filed yours - something that lets us know it was yours? I never saw anything about another one being filed prior to Smith’s.
Yeah. Did you catch how he checked the internet to see if the requestor was anti-Obama and then counseled Fukino to respond by saying the requested information was confidential (even though it’s not)?
That’s still the line Fukino is using for everything she doesn’t want to have to answer - all the while saying she is upholding the law when she’s blatantly breaking it by refusing to disclose what is DEMANDED by law for her to disclose.
Transparent to anybody who’s watching.
And it’s not just the DOH either. I had a response from OIP Director, Cathy Takase, saying it was reasonable for the DOH to assume that I was asking about Obama’s birth certificate even though I simply asked for index data for certificate #151-61- (whatever the numbers are). Why was it reasonable to assume that I was asking for Obama’s records? Aren’t they required by law to actually look at what I’m asking?
They’re acting like kangaroo agencies over there. If we let them get away with it, then it’s our fault. But we need everybody to give out a shout about it if anything’s gonna happen, and they know it. They’re playing chicken with the whole dad-blasted country.
LOL! Maybe not Jim Robinson, but perhaps the exciting and entertaining Jim Thompson!
Do you remember how the left said they were going to flood the net with fakes so that when the real BC was found, no one would know? That’s about the time Punksters showed up.
That reminds me of a scene in one of the Indiana Jones movies (was it "Temple of Doom"?) in which a valuable large diamond is being sought, and someone attempts to hide it by throwing it into a pile of ice chips.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.