Skip to comments.
Bush will veto any bill to stop port deal
AP ALERT
Posted on 02/21/2006 12:32:20 PM PST by Brian Mosely
ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE (AP) — President Bush says the deal allowing an Arab company to take over six major U.S. seaports should go forward and he will veto any bill that would stop it.
TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: 1handwashestheother; blahblahblah; botsusingtheracecard; buchananbrigade; bushbotsbluedresses; bushbotscirclewagons; bushclintonbushclint; bushsellout; clownposse; coulterwillexplode; d; dontworrybehappy; downfallofbush; dubaidubaidu; dubaidubya; dusappersinatizzy; eternalevil; failedcivicsclass; gameoverman; globalists; homelandsecurity; homosexual; howlermonkeys; howlinbots; howlinmonkeys; howlinsgang; hysteriatrain; ilovekeywords; jorgealbush; kneejerk; kneepadsstat; libtard; masshysteria; moonbatsonparade; muchadoaboutnothing; newworldorder; nonstory; openborderbushbots; pantiesinabunch; ports; ratpackattack; ratpackdunces; religionofports; surrendermonkeys; texasholdem; treason; uae; vetothisbutnotcfr; waronterror; wppff; wsayswhatmeworry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 3,061-3,079 next last
To: bildabare
I'm losing more respect for GW every day, but like I say- the worst republican is still better than the best democrat.
So you'd choose Arlen Specter over Zell Miller?
301
posted on
02/21/2006 1:00:40 PM PST
by
fix
To: Mo1
"Economically it benefits the USA"
How so?
All profits will go to UAE not USA.
The only thing that makes less sense than this deal is Bush's approach to border security.
302
posted on
02/21/2006 1:00:48 PM PST
by
markedman
(Islam means surrender, and I will NEVER surrender!)
To: All
303
posted on
02/21/2006 1:00:53 PM PST
by
VU4G10
(Have You Forgotten?)
To: Hildy
This deal is absolute insanity.
At this rate, what harm would it do to put Bin Laden in charge of Homeland Security?
304
posted on
02/21/2006 1:00:53 PM PST
by
Deo volente
(Not all Muslims are dangerous... just a few hundred million.)
To: Hildy
This is a President who does NOTHING about illegal immigration, now sells our PORTS to out enemies... Except he is doing no such thing. Our ports remain US ports. It's a management deal. Port Security remains US Customs just like before.
305
posted on
02/21/2006 1:00:54 PM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
To: YOUGOTIT
To: TheCrusader
It's not a fiasco, yet. It's a "blogstorm"...lol.
307
posted on
02/21/2006 1:01:01 PM PST
by
defenderSD
(¤¤ If ecoterrorists attack my SUV, I'll taser them.)
To: IndyTiger
Bush just gave the liberals a new talking point:
That President Bush will execute his first ever veto in his presidency in order to allow a muslim nation to take over our port operations.
What is he thinking?
To: Brian Mosely
Oh well. Watch him veto and get his veto overridden. Might be good for him.
309
posted on
02/21/2006 1:01:16 PM PST
by
jude24
("Thy law is written on the hearts of men, which iniquity itself effaces not." - St. Augustine)
To: ncountylee
.
Open the Door,
Enter POTUS HILLARY.
...on this one.
.
310
posted on
02/21/2006 1:01:16 PM PST
by
ALOHA RONNIE
("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
To: ElkGroveDan
Bush won't do the wrong thing just because ignorant people tell him to.
To: Pukin Dog
You all are about to learn a good lesson on how the Political game is played by a master of the craft. I think what we'll ultimately learn is that more politicians have been paid off by the Arabs.
312
posted on
02/21/2006 1:01:41 PM PST
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government "job" attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: Swordfished
the ports were already run by the BritishFirst I heard of that; I don't like that either.
However, the British at least are not an Islamic country that openly harbors extremist Muslims.
Yet.
313
posted on
02/21/2006 1:01:42 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Islam is a fatal disease that must be eradicated from the body Earth.)
To: traderrob6
The shoe doesn't fit. It's just a cheap smear by you.
Get bent.
To: KJC1
He said the Dubai company would NOT be in charge of port security, that that would rest with the Coast Guard and Customs.However, management would be from Dubai. And all it would take would be a few al Qaeda sympathizers in management to make it easier to smuggle ship-borne weapons into this country.
315
posted on
02/21/2006 1:01:55 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
To: W04Man
316
posted on
02/21/2006 1:02:11 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(If you don't want to be lumped in with those who commit violence in your name, take steps to end it.)
To: Swordfished
Now, now, don't try to ruin the fun. :-)
317
posted on
02/21/2006 1:02:13 PM PST
by
Howlin
("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
To: Esther Ruth
Well, and W had Rush blathering on for 3 hours, spinning it this way and that, all praise to the UAE, why Rush loved the UAE more than the DNC and thought they'd do a great job w the ports.Be sure to tune into Michael Savage later for a FAR different opinion...
To: Diva Betsy Ross
Diva, see my previous post. Look up what Alberto and Ridge said today.
319
posted on
02/21/2006 1:02:21 PM PST
by
W04Man
(Bush2004 Grassroots Campaign We Did It! NOW.... PLEASE STAY THE COURSE!)
To: Stellar Dendrite
>OMFG!!!!!!!!!!
Please refrain from using F as an adjective for G.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 3,061-3,079 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
