Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DEFAMATION -- LIBEL AND SLANDER [Florida Law - FReepers Heed]
Florida Bar Association ^

Posted on 10/24/2003 10:14:40 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine

Edited on 10/24/2003 12:02:17 PM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]

DEFAMATION -- LIBEL AND SLANDER

The First Amendment to the Constitution provides a broad right of freedom of speech. However, if a false statement has been made about you, you may have wondered if you could sue for defamation.

Generally, defamation consists of: (1) a false statement of fact about another; (2) an unprivileged publication of that statement to a third party; (3) some degree of fault, depending on the type of case; and (4) some harm or damage. Libel is defamation by the printed word and slander is defamation by the spoken word.

If the statement is made about a public official - for example, a police officer, mayor, school superintendent - or a public figure - that is a generally prominent person or a person who is actively involved in a public controversy, then it must be proven that the statement was made with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard for whether the statement was true or false. In other words, the fact that the statement was false is not enough to recover for defamation. On the other hand, if the statement was made about a private person, then it must be proven that the false statement was made without reasonable care as to whether the statement was true or false.

There are a number of defenses available in a defamation action. Of course, if a statement is true, there can be no action for defamation. Truth is a complete defense. Additionally, if the statement is an expression of an opinion as opposed to a statement of fact, there can be no action for defamation. We do not impose liability in this country for expressions of opinion. However, whether a statement will be deemed to be an expression of opinion as opposed to a statement of fact is not always an easy question to answer. For example, the mere fact that a statement is found in an editorial is not enough to qualify for the opinion privilege if the particular statement contained in the editorial is factual in nature.

There is also a privilege known as neutral reporting. For example, if a newspaper reports on newsworthy statements made about someone, the newspaper is generally protected if it makes a disinterested report of those statements. In some cases, the fact that the statements were made is newsworthy and the newspaper will not be held responsible for the truth of what is actually said.

There are other privileges as well. For example, where a person, such as a former employer, has a duty to make reports to other people and makes a report in good faith without any malicious intent, that report will be protected even though it may not be totally accurate.

Another example of a privilege is a report on a judicial proceeding. News organizations and others reporting on activities that take place in a courtroom are protected from defamation actions if they have accurately reported what took place.

If you think you have been defamed by a newspaper, magazine, radio or television station, you must make a demand for retraction before a lawsuit can be filed. If the newspaper, magazine, radio or television station publishes a retraction, you can still file suit, but your damages may be limited. Unless the media defendant acted with malice, bad faith or reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of the story, you can only recover your actual damages. No punitive damages can be assessed in the absence of these elements.

An action for libel or slander must be brought within two years of the time the statements were made. If you wait beyond this two year period, any lawsuit will be barred.

Libel and slander cases are often very complicated. Before you decide to take any action in a libel or slander case, you should consult with an attorney. An attorney can help you decide whether you have a case and advise you regarding the time and expense involved in bringing this type of action.

(updated 12/01)


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 1,761-1,774 next last
To: Pan_Yans Wife
And for all I know, you may have a sin or two in your past, but that doesn't make me the arbiter of all things good.
561 posted on 10/24/2003 1:47:00 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

To: ckca
Seems like a good way to prevent suits would be for each poster to say... 'in my opinion'.... (then carry on as they normally would.) There fore they would be merely expressing their opinion ....
562 posted on 10/24/2003 1:47:42 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny) ( Deuteronomy 32:37 -- And he shall say, Where are their gods, their rock in whom they trusted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
Of course there is. I paid him to do a little landscaping job.

There you go. Taking more jobs away from Anglo-Americans.

563 posted on 10/24/2003 1:48:06 PM PDT by Grando Calrissian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 543 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
"Ray, when someone asks you if you're a God, you say YES!"
564 posted on 10/24/2003 1:48:14 PM PDT by TheBigB (I respectfully decline the invitation to join your hallucination. But thanks for asking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Chancellor Palpatine
Did you mean that CP doesn't currently act as an attourney for FR or has never acted as an attourney here? (i can't remember exactly what your wording was)

According to this thread titled "***Unveiling... the new Free Republic Network!***" it says

"one_particular_harbour is serving as the Network's acting corporate attorney."

and he hasn't denied that he is One_Particular_Harbour.
565 posted on 10/24/2003 1:48:14 PM PDT by honeygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Thanks for the ping and post! Anyone who thinks their identify here is transparent is delusional!

Personally, I have seen no need to be transparent. If I did, I wouldn't post about the University of Oklahoma and other things that identify me as being not only from Oklahoma but from the home of the Sooners!

If someone has the resources, I believe they can track anyone down that tries to post behind a screen name!
566 posted on 10/24/2003 1:48:14 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Don't forget to Visit/donate at http://www.georgewbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
I don't know why women find that annoying, it's not like we're quoting things that aren't funny.
567 posted on 10/24/2003 1:48:25 PM PDT by discostu (The Joan Wilder?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 539 | View Replies]

To: Area51
Thank You! I knew I had seen that he was doing work for freerepublic
568 posted on 10/24/2003 1:48:41 PM PDT by ruoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
You're correct. Let's hope that no suits are filed claiming libel, and that the judges in those cases are more reasonable than those in the Florida courts.
569 posted on 10/24/2003 1:49:10 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (You may forget the one with whom you have laughed, but never the one with whom you have wept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush; TheBigB
"If we're wrong, we'll go to jail, peacefully. But if we're right- Mr. Mayor, you'll be responsible for saving the lives of millions of eligible voters."
570 posted on 10/24/2003 1:49:16 PM PDT by Modernman ("I'm just a simple man, trying to make my way in the universe."- Jango Fett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Well thanks for the free (it is isn't it? lol)advice. It would be much easier for me to accept though if I had not read some of your previous posts on Terri S and had seen you post the same concerns on other "hot" threads.

I will continue to pray about how I post (and encourage others also) but you know what? For years I thought I was the only one that had concerns about our country. That was until I found FR. I believe that justice is often blind and that the "good guys" don't usually win by being nice. The screamers seem to have the courts ear. Well, I'm learning to scream too. I try to be careful with what I say and do, but in my own small way I am trying to help take our country back and save a woman's life in the process. Of course I don't want to be sued or go to jail but there comes a time where a person must stand up for what's right , regardless of the consequences, don't you think?.

I saw a post from someone else regarding what would we do if FR was shut down. Well, I would never want that to happen but many of us are making outside contacts thru meetings, phone numbers and e-mails and the movement to take back our country is going to continue, one city, one state at a time. You seem a very knowledgable person. Why not help us with Terri, instead of (in my opinion) trying to shut us up.

571 posted on 10/24/2003 1:49:54 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
LOL!!!!That has got to be my absolute favorite from the movie.
572 posted on 10/24/2003 1:49:57 PM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: olorin
What the disclaimer does not say is that every single post is an opinion. In other words, some posts may be opinions, while others may constitute assertions of fact.

Nope. It says they're opinions. "Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters "

573 posted on 10/24/2003 1:50:08 PM PDT by concerned about politics ( Have you donated to the Salvation Army? Liberals HATE Christian organizations! Tax deductable, too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: Area51
You beat me to it!!
574 posted on 10/24/2003 1:50:14 PM PDT by honeygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
I should ask you what I asked the others: Do you think your worldview and interests would be better served on a website called "Communist Dictatorship"?
575 posted on 10/24/2003 1:50:36 PM PDT by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: discostu
No kidding, it's not like we're quoting a bowling broadcast or something.
576 posted on 10/24/2003 1:50:38 PM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: John Beresford Tipton
An individual who says "X is a murderer" would have to prove that X was in fact a murderer if sued, regardless of how reasonable the conclusion had appeared to the speaker.

Bullskite. The plaintiff has the burden of proof, not the defendant. Please don't tell me you're actually a lawyer....

577 posted on 10/24/2003 1:50:52 PM PDT by stands2reason ("What you see at fight club is a generation of men raised by women." -- Chuck Palahniuk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
He's an attempted murderer until she dies. Then he's a murderer.

You might want to pull out your copy of Black’s Law Dictionary and look up the definition of “murder”. To save you time, here it is:
"Murder is the crime of intentionally causing the death of another human being, without lawful excuse. When an illegal death was not caused intentionally, but was caused by negligence (or some other defense, such as diminished capacity), the crime committed is manslaughter, which is considered to be less serious than murder. Manslaughter is often broken into two categories: involuntary manslaughter and voluntary manslaughter."

Please note – “…without lawful excuse.” That means an illegal act, and does not apply in this case.

578 posted on 10/24/2003 1:50:53 PM PDT by R. Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
In my opinion it is a stupid post but now that the rhetorical flames of specious BS has been brought under control by many members on FR who also think it is BS, then it is just a flame board like the Nazi flame poster last week..
579 posted on 10/24/2003 1:51:05 PM PDT by Porterville (American First, Human being Second; liberal your derivative lifestyle will never be normalized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
Seems like a good way to prevent suits would be for each poster to say... 'in my opinion'.... (then carry on as they normally would.) There fore they would be merely expressing their opinion ....

I concur. However, it probably won't work (or make much sense) if a poster was to follow "in my opinion" with "I know for a fact."

580 posted on 10/24/2003 1:51:21 PM PDT by olorin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 562 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 1,761-1,774 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson