Posted on 10/24/2003 10:14:40 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
Edited on 10/24/2003 12:02:17 PM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]
DEFAMATION -- LIBEL AND SLANDER
The First Amendment to the Constitution provides a broad right of freedom of speech. However, if a false statement has been made about you, you may have wondered if you could sue for defamation.
Generally, defamation consists of: (1) a false statement of fact about another; (2) an unprivileged publication of that statement to a third party; (3) some degree of fault, depending on the type of case; and (4) some harm or damage. Libel is defamation by the printed word and slander is defamation by the spoken word.
If the statement is made about a public official - for example, a police officer, mayor, school superintendent - or a public figure - that is a generally prominent person or a person who is actively involved in a public controversy, then it must be proven that the statement was made with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard for whether the statement was true or false. In other words, the fact that the statement was false is not enough to recover for defamation. On the other hand, if the statement was made about a private person, then it must be proven that the false statement was made without reasonable care as to whether the statement was true or false.
There are a number of defenses available in a defamation action. Of course, if a statement is true, there can be no action for defamation. Truth is a complete defense. Additionally, if the statement is an expression of an opinion as opposed to a statement of fact, there can be no action for defamation. We do not impose liability in this country for expressions of opinion. However, whether a statement will be deemed to be an expression of opinion as opposed to a statement of fact is not always an easy question to answer. For example, the mere fact that a statement is found in an editorial is not enough to qualify for the opinion privilege if the particular statement contained in the editorial is factual in nature.
There is also a privilege known as neutral reporting. For example, if a newspaper reports on newsworthy statements made about someone, the newspaper is generally protected if it makes a disinterested report of those statements. In some cases, the fact that the statements were made is newsworthy and the newspaper will not be held responsible for the truth of what is actually said.
There are other privileges as well. For example, where a person, such as a former employer, has a duty to make reports to other people and makes a report in good faith without any malicious intent, that report will be protected even though it may not be totally accurate.
Another example of a privilege is a report on a judicial proceeding. News organizations and others reporting on activities that take place in a courtroom are protected from defamation actions if they have accurately reported what took place.
If you think you have been defamed by a newspaper, magazine, radio or television station, you must make a demand for retraction before a lawsuit can be filed. If the newspaper, magazine, radio or television station publishes a retraction, you can still file suit, but your damages may be limited. Unless the media defendant acted with malice, bad faith or reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of the story, you can only recover your actual damages. No punitive damages can be assessed in the absence of these elements.
An action for libel or slander must be brought within two years of the time the statements were made. If you wait beyond this two year period, any lawsuit will be barred.
Libel and slander cases are often very complicated. Before you decide to take any action in a libel or slander case, you should consult with an attorney. An attorney can help you decide whether you have a case and advise you regarding the time and expense involved in bringing this type of action.
(updated 12/01)
There you go. Taking more jobs away from Anglo-Americans.
I will continue to pray about how I post (and encourage others also) but you know what? For years I thought I was the only one that had concerns about our country. That was until I found FR. I believe that justice is often blind and that the "good guys" don't usually win by being nice. The screamers seem to have the courts ear. Well, I'm learning to scream too. I try to be careful with what I say and do, but in my own small way I am trying to help take our country back and save a woman's life in the process. Of course I don't want to be sued or go to jail but there comes a time where a person must stand up for what's right , regardless of the consequences, don't you think?.
I saw a post from someone else regarding what would we do if FR was shut down. Well, I would never want that to happen but many of us are making outside contacts thru meetings, phone numbers and e-mails and the movement to take back our country is going to continue, one city, one state at a time. You seem a very knowledgable person. Why not help us with Terri, instead of (in my opinion) trying to shut us up.
Nope. It says they're opinions. "Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters "
Bullskite. The plaintiff has the burden of proof, not the defendant. Please don't tell me you're actually a lawyer....
He's an attempted murderer until she dies. Then he's a murderer.
You might want to pull out your copy of Black’s Law Dictionary and look up the definition of “murder”. To save you time, here it is:
"Murder is the crime of intentionally causing the death of another human being, without lawful excuse. When an illegal death was not caused intentionally, but was caused by negligence (or some other defense, such as diminished capacity), the crime committed is manslaughter, which is considered to be less serious than murder. Manslaughter is often broken into two categories: involuntary manslaughter and voluntary manslaughter."
Please note – “…without lawful excuse.” That means an illegal act, and does not apply in this case.
I concur. However, it probably won't work (or make much sense) if a poster was to follow "in my opinion" with "I know for a fact."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.