Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US diplomat extracted from London after feds allegedly discover child porn — and UK pols are furious: ‘Protecting pedophiles’
NY Post ^ | 9/13/26 | Anthony Blair

Posted on 09/13/2026 12:47:27 PM PDT by Libloather

An American diplomat working at the US Embassy in London was detained and back to the US in a secret operation after authorities allegedly found child porn on his devices, according to a report. The unidentified diplomat is alleged to have received the twisted material from his US-based brother, leading to a raid by US Marines on his London apartment late last month, the UK Sun reported.

Now, UK officials and authorities are expressing outrage, who say that the US had no legal authority to seize him, according to the the Sun.

On Aug. 24, a day before the dawn raid, a Boeing 747 flew from Chicago to a Royal Air Force base in Gloucestershire, Southwest England, where the US Air Force has a large presence, according to reports.

The following day, the same plane left the base and flew back to the US, landing at Dover Air Force Base in Delaware shortly before 8 p.m local time.

Less than four hours later, the plane reportedly left Delaware and flew to O’Hare Airport in Chicago.

British police and authorities were only informed about the raid following the diplomat’s extraction, according to the Sun.

The clandestine operation has sparked fury among British politicians.

“The US Government is now protecting pedophiles,” conservative member of parliament Ben Obese-Jecty wrote on X.

“US Marines conducting a raid on British soil, on which they have no jurisdiction, to seize one of their own diplomats and then use US military resources to ferry the suspect out of the country and fly him to the US is completely unacceptable,” he added.

The diplomatic fallout comes just days before the new British Prime Minister Andy Burnham is set to meet with President Donald Trump at the UN in New York.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; History; Local News
KEYWORDS: benobesejecty; diplomat; frukspam; obesejectymustresign; pedophiles; porn; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Libloather

Jimmy Saville anyone?


21 posted on 09/13/2026 2:21:09 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (I just want FReepers to READ THE ARTICLE. And then think 30 secs before pounding keyboard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Could have scouting for 9 year old bride....sick.


22 posted on 09/13/2026 2:24:29 PM PDT by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and harder to find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Oh, _now_ UK pols rarin’ to go against pedophiles, are they?


23 posted on 09/13/2026 2:30:04 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

A US diplomat is sacrosanct. The politician can watch US justice unfold.


24 posted on 09/13/2026 2:33:06 PM PDT by MortMan (Americans are increasingly isolated by their connectivity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I’m outraged, disgusted, and laughing ironically.

Who in the bloody hell are the muzzie-loving Brits to cry foul when they allow the goat humpers to molest and savage young girls at will, for fear of being called “intolerant”?

Screw you.

You don’t have an honest leg to stand on.

That said, if the brother and this diplomat were trading child porn for kicks, hang them both.

They probably were not trying to rescue victims of the Crown and Parliament Approved child porn.


25 posted on 09/13/2026 2:36:29 PM PDT by CaptainPhilFan (God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do things which are improper and repulsive, Rom 1:28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS

Yup, just ask Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and Peter Mandelson.


26 posted on 09/13/2026 2:36:31 PM PDT by mewzilla (Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! 🇺🇸 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

What are they complaining about? He will be prosecuted here in the US for child-porn.................


27 posted on 09/13/2026 2:46:06 PM PDT by Red Badger (Iryna Zarutska, May 22, 2002 Kyiv, Ukraine – August 22, 2025 Charlotte, North Carolina Say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
“The US Government is now protecting pedophiles,” conservative member of parliament Ben Obese-Jecty wrote on X.

Idiot. We're not protecting him, we're going to prosecute him under U S federal law. He isn't getting off scot-free.

28 posted on 09/13/2026 2:47:59 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (There are three kinds of rats: Rats, Damned Rats, and DemocRats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin
The host country can request that diplomat's home country waive the diplomatic immunity. No report that they did.

Understandable as they didn't know anything about the situation until the perpetrator had been removed from the country.

29 posted on 09/13/2026 2:50:13 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (There are three kinds of rats: Rats, Damned Rats, and DemocRats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Flash Bazbeaux
Normally a host country has no criminal jurisdiction over an accredited diplomat. That’s what “diplomatic immunity” means. If that is the case here, then the US is not protecting the diplomat from anything.

This is why the story doesn't make sense. If he's *OUR* Diplomat, he's outside their jurisdiction anyways.

If we grabbed him, it's probably because we want to punish him. Are they objecting to us punishing our own criminals?

Either the British Authorities are nuts, or whoever did this story didn't get some facts straight.

30 posted on 09/13/2026 2:59:14 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
“The US Government is now protecting pedophiles,” conservative member of parliament Ben Obese-Jecty wrote on X.

Sorry, we thought he was Muslim.

31 posted on 09/13/2026 3:16:03 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady (The greatest wealth is to live content with little. -Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I maintain a healthy skepticism of any government that finds “child porn” on any device. Sure it happens and creeps consume that filth. But there is no easier way for a government to take out a political enemy by placing CP on a phone of one of their enemies. If he is guilty as proven by evidence, hang him. If not. Beware. Libs WILL place the filth on their political enemies to get rid of them.


32 posted on 09/13/2026 3:51:24 PM PDT by Organic Panic ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Now, UK officials and authorities are expressing outrage, who say that the US had no legal authority to seize him, according to the the Sun.

Coming from UK officials who protect Islamic rape gangs targeting underage English girls, this is rich.

33 posted on 09/13/2026 4:06:53 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (If you want to hate America, watch the news. If you want to love America, drive across it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

“ We arrested one of our own and returned him to the US for punishment here. 🙄”
**************************************************

That’s my expectation. And for a crime that the Brits had no knowledge of and which likely involved no British victims.


34 posted on 09/13/2026 4:14:43 PM PDT by House Atreides (I’m now ULTRA-MAGA-PRO-MAX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
Understandable as they didn't know anything about the situation until the perpetrator had been removed from the country.

That's totally irrelevant. A request to waive diplomatic immunity and extradite a diplomat can me made at any time. I don't think the State Dept. wants to waive diplomatic immunity for what's on an electronic device. A foreign spy agency could have hacked the device, as they would have an interest in doing so. Sounds like they got the guy out of the U.K. to minimize the embarrassment.
35 posted on 09/13/2026 4:46:19 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

He should be shipped back.

Anne Sacoolas, the wife of a US diplomat, killed a teenage British motorcyclist in 2019. She was driving on the wrong side of the road. Read about the case. It is disgusting.


36 posted on 09/13/2026 4:52:32 PM PDT by Miami Rebel (RE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

authorities allegedly found child porn on his devices
= = =

Keep your Devices Clean!!!!


37 posted on 09/13/2026 5:18:48 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob ( My pronoun is EXIT. Generally full of /S -- Living with Havana Syndrome -infected from Main Stream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Something smells off about this story.

Since when do US diplomats have their electronic devices checked on by foreign ‘authorities’?


38 posted on 09/13/2026 7:30:38 PM PDT by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aiera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin
That's totally irrelevant. A request to waive diplomatic immunity and extradite a diplomat can me made at any time.

Once the perpetrator is back on U S soil we're no longer talking about a diplomat with diplomatic immunity, so there is nothing to waive. If the Brits want to have him returned to the UK they would have to issue a warrant for his arrest and request extradition. Waiving diplomatic immunity needs to be done while the perpetrator is still in the host country.

39 posted on 09/13/2026 7:46:55 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (There are three kinds of rats: Rats, Damned Rats, and DemocRats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
Once the perpetrator is back on U S soil we're no longer talking about a diplomat with diplomatic immunity, so there is nothing to waive. If the Brits want to have him returned to the UK they would have to issue a warrant for his arrest and request extradition. Waiving diplomatic immunity needs to be done while the perpetrator is still in the host country.

You need to educate yourself: Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations
40 posted on 09/13/2026 7:55:40 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson