Posted on 09/05/2026 4:48:07 AM PDT by Red Badger
Something interesting is happening inside the plumbing of the global financial system.
It was reported yesterday that the Netherlands just shifted approximately 86 tonnes of its gold reserves from New York and Ottawa to London, explicitly citing “increasing geopolitical unrest” and the need to prepare for severe crises.
The Dutch central bank says gold held in London can be accessed and traded more quickly during an emergency than gold stored in New York or Canada.
That is some wonderfully sanitized central-bank language to deliver a message that seems to me to be “confidence in the U.S. holding the world’s gold…and likely being a cornerstone of the global economic machine…is dwindling.”
Either way, it means the Netherlands has effectively decided that if the world goes sideways, it would prefer substantially less of its ultimate crisis reserve sitting in North America.
Why is the Netherlands moving gold to London? What is behind the central bank's choice? - La Sicilia
Before the move, 31.3% of Dutch gold was in New York, 19.7% in Ottawa and 18.1% in London. Now New York and Ottawa each hold 18.5%, while London has jumped to 32.1%. The Netherlands owns 612.4 tonnes of gold altogether.
Technically, all 86 tonnes weren’t loaded onto planes and flown across the Atlantic. DNB sold roughly 59 tonnes in New York and bought equivalent market-standard gold in London. More than 27 tonnes were physically moved from the U.S. and Canada to the Netherlands, while a similar quantity moved from the Netherlands to London.
The distinction matters operationally. Economically, not so much. The result is fewer Dutch reserves in New York and considerably more in London.
And we’ve seen this before. In 2014, the Netherlands physically brought 122.5 tonnes home from New York. Germany later completed the relocation of 300 tonnes from New York to Frankfurt. And between July 2025 and January 2026, France eliminated its remaining New York gold position, replacing 129 tonnes held there with market-standard bars now stored in Paris. France says that decision was about trading efficiency, not politics, which is fair enough. The bars nevertheless wound up in Paris instead of New York.
India has also dramatically reduced the portion of its gold stored overseas, although most of that repatriation involved gold held in London rather than America.
This seems to be me to be a very obvious trend toward central banks wanting greater control over the one reserve asset that is nobody else’s liability.
Gold doesn’t require Washington to pay you back. Funny how attractive that feature becomes when Washington owes more than $40 trillion.
As I have droned on about for a decade, the entire modern financial system is ultimately held together by confidence and fiat. The dollar works because everyone believes everyone else will continue accepting dollars. Treasuries work because the world believes the United States will honor its debts without destroying the purchasing power of the currency used to repay them.
Confidence…not basic math or economics…is what encourages people like Paul Krugman to say things like “debt is money we owe to ourselves”.
It’s what allows Stephanie Kelton to write a book called “The Deficit Myth”.
For decades, that confidence allowed America to enjoy the greatest financing arrangement imaginable: running up a tab with no worries about paying it back, while we turn into entitled chickensh!t cowards about equity markets because we feel like the Fed can, and always will, bail us out at the very first sign of trouble.
But there are little cracks appearing everywhere.
The dollar still dominates global reserves, so claims that it is about to disappear are nonsense. It represented 57.13% of disclosed foreign-exchange reserves in Q1 2026. But that’s down substantially from levels above 70% around the turn of the century.
Meanwhile, central banks can’t seem to get enough of the barbarous relic.
They bought 863 tonnes of gold in 2025 after three consecutive years of purchases above 1,000 tonnes. The World Gold Council’s 2026 survey found 89% of reserve managers expect global central-bank gold holdings to increase over the coming year, while a record 45% expect their own institution to buy more.
Apparently nobody told the world’s central bankers that gold is just a shiny rock. Also, as I’ve constantly talked about here with my friend Andy Schectman, something unusual has also happened at COMEX.
DBS data show roughly 289,000 gold delivery notices during the first nine months of 2025, versus approximately 119,000 during the same period of 2024…about 2.4 times as many. A delivery notice transfers title to deliverable metal; it doesn’t necessarily mean somebody immediately backs a Brinks truck up to the warehouse. But it is another indication of heightened demand for physical settlement.
Gold is moving. Central banks are buying it. Countries are repositioning it. And increasingly, they want to know exactly where it is and how quickly they can get their hands on it. All of which would be merely interesting if America’s fiscal situation weren’t simultaneously becoming absurd.
Source: Goldman Sachs August 28, 2026 note on gold
U.S. federal debt has now crossed $40 trillion, while some Treasury yields have reached their highest levels in nearly two decades. For some reason, it feels like 6% on the 10 year Treasury is looming closely….
The global bond selloff reflects several forces: inflation, huge government borrowing requirements, geopolitical pressures and expectations for interest rates. So it would be too simplistic to blame rising yields entirely on declining confidence in America.
But the bond market is sending Washington a message nonetheless: Money isn’t free anymore and something is horribly wrong with the status quo.
And that creates the problem I have been writing about for years. At $40 trillion of debt, higher interest rates produce higher interest expense. Higher interest expense produces larger deficits. Larger deficits require more borrowing. More borrowing creates more Treasury supply. And eventually investors demand still-higher yields to absorb it.
It’s a fiscal snake eating its own tail, except the snake has a Bloomberg terminal and an Excel spreadsheet that allows it to temporarily mess with the numbers. There are only so many ways out. Washington could slash spending, dramatically raise taxes or…as Treasury Secretary Bessent suggested this week, somehow grow its way out of the problem. I’ll pause for laughter.
But my longstanding view is that eventually Washington chooses another solution: yield curve control.
We’ve done it before. Beginning in 1942, the Federal Reserve pegged Treasury bill rates at 0.375% and effectively capped long-term Treasury yields at 2.5%. Maintaining those rates required the Fed to buy government securities whenever necessary. Federal Reserve historians explicitly note that the policy forced the Fed to surrender control over the size of its balance sheet and money supply.
That is the endgame I continue to worry about. If the free market eventually demands 6%, 7% or 8% to finance America’s debt and Washington decides those rates are economically or fiscally intolerable, somebody has to buy the bonds at lower yields.
That somebody is the Federal Reserve. Call it yield curve control. Call it QE. Call it an “emergency market functioning facility” if you’d like to make it sound sufficiently boring for financial TV. It amounts to the same basic choice: suppress the cost of financing the debt and let the currency absorb some of the consequences.
And that is why these seemingly obscure gold stories matter. The Netherlands isn’t abandoning America. France isn’t declaring war on the dollar. Germany didn’t empty the New York Fed because it expected the apocalypse. Something subtler is happening.
Central banks are buying enormous quantities of an asset with no counterparty risk while increasingly emphasizing physical control, accessibility and geographic diversification. At the same time, America’s debt has crossed $40 trillion and the bond market is demanding increasingly expensive compensation to finance governments around the world.
The monetary system is a confidence game. This is why I focus my efforts on highlighting potential areas of the market that cannot be printed and can sidestep, or benefit, from inflation.
So when another American ally decides that, for the next crisis, it would prefer substantially less of its gold sitting in New York, I pay attention. They can call it diversification, crisis preparedness, or improved tradability.
These a-holes in charge always have a wonderful vocabulary for avoiding the obvious. I just call it as I see it: taking chips of the table as you lose confidence in the U.S. financial system.
Once we have robots building robots building robots, we will eithe be in a paradise or a prison......
All of this brilliant analysis and discussion, but no one has told me what the price of gold will be in 30 days or 90 days. It would help if I knew. Anyone?
I have heard ‘balance sheet’ adjustments in the recent past by the administration. Mark to market of gold would be one piece of it. The move to privatize sundry acres of federal land I have read is as much as 150 trillion
Is that the only room we have left to run up the debt of confidence we will pay it back is needed?
I also think it is an EU/NATO play against the US. We are not playing nice as globalists and Trump’s recent outburst about rates being lowered or he will raise tariffs on every nation we are at a trade imbalance doesn’t show a willingness to share with other kids in the sandbox.
My thoughts exactly, nor most anywhere else in the world.
Singapore? Lee Kuan Yew is looking like a genius these days.
There is plenty of work they cannot do economically in a market that hasn't developed yet.
Making assumptions about the rebalance without knowing other factor like trade balances and other investments is pure speculation.
I’m so relieved that someone as astute as Paul Krugman let us know that “debt is simply money we owe to ourselves”. Whew! That was a close call. /s
Is it any different from a Mexicanized United States?
When we have a ranting South American tin pot dictator running the US, will anyone want the dollar to be the reserve currency of the planet?
so Gold: $4,441.35 0.00
Silver: $66.90 0.00
What is AOC’s net worth?
I don’t think she is close to being a millionaire is she?
She claims to be deeply in student loan debt....
Her Congressional salary is $174,000.
Her current reported campaign stash is over $15 Million.
Since she is in a ‘safe’ district she doesn’t need to spend very much. And still begs for more!.
Even if she loses she is set for life........
Multiply this scenario by 535!.....
I do not know the reason the Netherland’s gold is being moved
‘
The reason the gold is here is to periodically settle accounts with other nations per the Bank of International Settlements
The gold is merely moved from the Netherlands to say Vietnam or the USA vault section located in the New York Federal Reserve vaults in lower Manhattan. I would guess the intention is to settle accounts with gold at a location other than New York
That was smoke and mirrors, what do experts estimate her personal net worth at?
Personally she is probably “Broke as a convict” as we say in The South!..........
I think Musk is right when he says that ai and robots are the only thing that will save the USA from bankrupsy.
The cure for the problem will be growth rates that no one has ever seen before and deflation.
The debt will not go away. Rather the debt will shrink as a proportion of the economy to levels last seen in the 1970’s or earlier.
We’re already living in a 3rd world economy. Balance of payments went negative in the 1970s, wages stagnating since the 1970s, etc etc.
The debt will never be repaid, and it was never really intended to be. It’s a moot point now, because of the size.
What isn’t moot, the government must make timely interest payments on that debt. Every bit of the 40 Trillions of dollars rolls over every 4 years or so. They can save the dollar, or save the markets, but they can’t save both.
This is always the problem, money is the unit of account. If the underlying unit of account is undefined, there will be problems. Maybe it doesn’t have to defined in terms of gold, but there has to be something that can be used as a standard.
Even nominal conservatives start screeching at such suggestions when this is pointed out.
We have astonishingly accurate definitions of time, weights, measures, atomic particles, everything. Though not when it comes to money. Just nominal numbers, or a piece of paper with a picture of a dead guy on it. Weird, huh?
“The Meter lost several centimeters against the Yard in heavy measuring yesterday…”. We don’t allow such jiggery-pokery when it comes to measuring anything else.
Some crazy old Limey gang in a pub somewhere is trying to figure out how to interdict the shipment and get away with it.
Red Badger wrote: “If I was looking for a place to stash my nation’s Gold Reserves, I sure as hell wouldn’t pick LONDON! or any European state. Not even Switzerland............”
If, as I suspect, this has more to do with the EU imposing capital controls, and not a reaction to US debt, you would not have that option.
The Muslims in Europe only want gold for the jizya.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.