Posted on 08/29/2026 6:00:37 PM PDT by lowbridge
Grok AI Analyzed the 1967 Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot Film — The Results Are Shocking
For nearly six decades, the Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot film has resisted every attempt to explain it away. Now Grok AI has analyzed the legendary 1967 footage using movement, proportion, terrain, and mask-boundary tests.
What the system found challenges the classic man-in-a-suit theory in ways that are difficult to ignore. And one frame in particular may be the most unsettling clue of all.
(Excerpt) Read more at m.youtube.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
So how did they create a Patty suit and film a dry run a year before they filmed the sighting?
lol
Obama’s birth certificate next?
The two creatures don’t really look like each other. One is obviously a suit and one isn’t.
Look at the Munns Report. Or the YouTuber Thinker Thinker. A human could not walk in the PGF because the knees and hips are in the wrong place. You can’t line up a human skeleton, super imposed over “Patty” an make the joints line up.
It’s anatomy, it doesn’t lie. Some Youtube influencers and journalist on the other hand.....
Is this the video where they guy confessed to being BF and his friend filmed it?
no, this year a documentary got released showing a practice run in the Patty suit. The footage is a year before the famous sighting, the physical film has development time stamp on it.
You’re using youtubers as both support and calling them liars. Pretty shaky grounds. I’ll stick with the physical evidence of a dry run a year before the “sighting.”
It’s naive to assume that Grok or any other AI program would tell you the truth.
Science debunks it as an ape. All apes, including gorillas, have long arms and short legs.
Humans, however, tend to have shorter arms and legs that are about half the bodies length.
If the Pattison film was real, it would mean that Bigfoot is a human species.
I’m looking forward to the new documentary coming out by Les Stroud called “The Question of Bigfoot”. He is “Survivor Man” and did the 7 days alone survival film stuff.
He got interest in Sasquatch primarily due to activity he experienced on one of his 7 day outings in Alaska. He did another series (can be found on youtube) of him searching for Bigfoot. In that series he takes a very non-committal view of it. Interviewing people, questioning some of their beliefs, but finding some evidence to be compelling.
In one episode he experienced stuff himself, but never comes across as fully convinced of what it was. “Well, whatever it was it was on two feet, and not a bear, and not a human.”
In more recent things I’ve seen him talk he alludes that it could be some ancient ancestor of humans. Like a Neanderthal or something.
His film is due out in December hopefully. He said something like it is geared towards the scoffers. “Really Uncle Joe - you believe in Bigfoot?! Snicker”. And at the end of them watching my film I want them to sit back in the couch, in silence for 10 seconds, and then say “Well Holy F.&*#”.
We’ll see. I “believe” in Sasquatch, but also hope that one is never found or that they are figured out. I like the mystery and the legend and the pondering about it. Find out that it’s just a big ape, well that is cool I guess, but not as interesting.
Of course if it is a telepathic Neanderthal (like some posit - even Les I think), that would still be a pretty big mystery and something to ponder on!
GROK IS IN ON IT! Dang it all!
I didn’t need AUI to tell me the moon landing was fake. They did a terrible job at faking it.
You wrote: Costume designer Dave Muns who made costumes for movies has said flatly that human would not not be able to fit their head in the “Mask” due to the forehead slope. Here is a link to an abbreviated version. He was a respected creator of costumes for Hollywood movies.
I looked up Rick Baker's opinion on the Patterson footage. He's the Hollywood effects master who specialized in apes and similar creatures, who's "Harry and the Hendersons" Bigfoot and "American Werewolf in London" still astonishes people today.
He said the Patterson Sasquatch was a man in a suit because the hair movement didn't follow that of a natural being.
Despite his opinion and Patterson himself coming off like a cheap huckster I lean toward the hominid being real. While Native American lore and stories vary widely this one is very consistent across tribes and locations.
You are correct, sir. Enhanced video has proven this beyond a shadow of a doubt.
-SB
> If the Pattison film was real, it would mean that Bigfoot is a human species.
Half neanderthal, half unknown according to a DNA analysis that was finally done.
-SB
Some of the images were AI generated. I think the entire thing was AI generated - using the same monkey suits, even when not talking about suits, etc. It was bad enough with real people saying idiot stuff on the internet and not know what is the truth. But now with AI generated stuff I find myself doubting most of it.
Heh - see my post 32.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
