Posted on 07/10/2026 4:52:14 AM PDT by Merrick
American farmer, Julius Ray Tucker, just tested his soil & found 5X more aluminum than last year. His GMO seeds grow perfectly, but his heirloom crops are dying.
— Meanwhile, Bill Gates is pushing GMO seeds engineered to thrive in aluminum-rich soil. And geoengineering delivering that aluminum from our skies.
We are being ruled by extremely evil people who want ONLY their GMO seeds to grow. They want total control of our food, our skies, the air, our soil & what gets injected into our bodies.
(Excerpt) Read more at rumble.com ...
This is part of the contrail conspiracy sovereign citizen belief system.
One of them learned that clouds were seeded with aluminum dust. Another learned that years ago the Navy conducted a test dumping harmless bacteria off California to see if it was possible for a foreign aggressor to conduct a successful biological weapons strike by air and prevailing winds,
Then one day they got off their cell phones and were hanging around outside on the back porch smoking weed ir drinking and noticed, for the first time, the contrails that have been around since jet flight.
Wondering about the “weird clouds” , someone mentioned cloud seeding using aluminum and proposed that the funny strappy clouds must be composed of aluminum.
Someone else recalled the Navy experiment and theorized that that kind of thing is ongoing and widespread because of Fauci, or Jews, or “them,” whoever they are.
And since clouds can produce rain, seeded clouds must produce “aluminum rain” and all this aluminum rain falls on farm fields and contaminates the soil, because everyone knows how cheaply aluminum can be bought and spread around by means of airplanes. And /or, the mysterious people simply known as “they” are spraying the entire country with covid, etc., just because they can, or because it gives bill Gates something to do. Because as everyone knows, the federal government wants to contaminate soil so that only specifically designed aluminum and disease proof GMO crops can grow in it, and only your heirlooms will die, thus preventing masses of Americans from starting highly profitable organic heirloom food farms that might compete with modern agriculture, and reduce the need for plastic straws.
Or something like that.
I never responded to this.
You can absolutely get seed from GMO crops the same way you can from anything else, but it reduces the crop you have to sell, is labor intensive to gather, resulting in buying it new every year begin WAY more economical.
But that is not all you need to consider. The GMO seeds are bred to be resistant to a few chemical, like glyphosate, as well as having increased tolerance to dry and wet conditions, and molds. If you recover your own seeds from GMO you planted you won’t *just* get GMO seed. This guy in this video has three different varieties of corn he showed you, roughly co-located. And he has neighbors who may or may not be using the same GMO corn he is. So he can’t predict what he will get from corn seed that are the result of bees moving over all of those plants.
Yeah - I commented on this REPEATEDLY already - starting with POST #2!!
I promise you you do NOT know more than I do about this. I have a PhD in physical chemistry and maintain a small personal farm.
Don’t go all Dunning-Kruger because you have Google.
Aluminum phosphate is used in fertilizer:
https://farmonaut.com/mining/aluminum-phosphate-tin-phosphate-phosphate-mineral-uses
Speaking of weather modification. . . Wasn’t there something in the (non-mainstream) news not too long ago about the Iranians bombing some huge radar / dish arrays in the Mideast that were believed to be used for weather modification? After their destruction, the Mideast finally got the much-needed rain that had gone missing for several seasons.
“have a PhD in physical chemistry and maintain a small personal farm.”
Which is why you should not have made that mistake in the real math. I am a Geologist and understand elemental soils a bit myself. Whether it be mining or agriculture the elemental assessment content of soil or stone does not change. Right off the bat you should have known that 5% aluminum content of all soil does not equate to 5% as “Exchangeable” aluminum content. There is a huge difference between the two.
following....
That is correct. As AlPO4. It’s the PO4 (phosphate) that acts as the fertilizer. And if your pH is correct then phosphate gets released for your plants to take up and the aluminum ion (in correct pH) is incorporated into minerals in the soil before the plant can absorb them.
If your pH is too low, the whether you add this fertilizer or not aluminum will leach out of minerals in the soil and your plants take it up. So if you’re a good farmer you maintain proper pH in your soil.
Which is why - in POST #2 - I differentiated between the two, and posted repeatedly that if he meant total aluminum he is full of crap and if he meant bioavailable aluminum he is a crappy farmer who hasn’t maintained soil pH.
Go look at the posts and tell me I made the mistake you claim.
Now - again to the point - if his *bioavailable* aluminum is killing his plants it’s through CHLOROSIS - which is bleaching of the plant, so it does because it can do photosynthesis. Not one bleached plant in his video.
So, geoengineer - worried about bioavailable aluminum - how did you make that mistake?
And if you’re a geologist, why did you say, “parts per gram is how it’s measured.” That is a MEANINGLESS unit and any geologist would know that. Calling your bluff.
“Yellowing of the areas between the veins (interveinal chlorosis) is usually indicative of manganese, iron or magnesium deficiency. Iron deficiency affects the youngest leaves first, whereas the symptoms of manganese and magnesium deficiency tend to start in the older leaves.
“Nitrogen deficiency causes a more general yellowing or reddening, initially usually of the older leaves, often accompanied by a lack of vigour. With potassium deficiency the yellowing is often more pronounced at the leaf edges.”
https://www.rhs.org.uk/problems/chlorosis
“that if he meant total aluminum he is full of crap”
And there is no indication in the video this “IS” what he meant. You Assumed this on your own and ran with it... As for grams there are two measurements. If you had read the PDF link I shared it explains this.
“Exchangeable Al, ppm” and “Exchangeable Al, meq/100 g”. Milliequivalent per “100 Grams”.
And, by the way, several of my go-to chemicals for weeds in my lawn work through chlorosis - many weeds have a different chlorophyll mechanism that fescue, and there are organic compounds that prevent chlorophyll production and photosynthesis in these plants. Triclopyr is an example. But it’s a balance. Too much and you will kill your grass.
So there are potentially many things that result in chlorosis. None of that changes the two inescapable facts that elevated bioavailable aluminum causes chlorosis (none of which is evident in that video) and if you have elevated bioavailable aluminum you are a crap farmer who need to lime his farm.
And I repeatedly said, “giving him the benefit of the doubt,” and talk about bioavailable aluminum in that vain - going ALL THE WAY BACK TO POST #2. The discussion of total aluminum BECAUSE HE DIDN”T MAKE CLEAR what he meant was a separate thread and PLENTY of people here (including you) jumped on the “they’ve been spraying for years, I believe it,” bandwagon and the REAL numbers behind that claim had to be laid out.
You are correct in FINALLY distinguishing between TOTAL and BIOAVAILABLE aluminum - WHICH I DID FROM POST #2 - and because I did it ALL THE WAY BACK IN POST #2 your claim that I didn’t understand this or am not talking about that or am only just not finally talk about that is simply proven wrong.
It simply DOESN’T matter how much total aluminum he has in his soil - if his *bioavailable* aluminum is too high it’s because he let his pH get too low and has NOTHING to do with spraying. And a geologist should know that.
Parts per million or similar means something. But also only if you add by weight, by volume, by mole, or by equivalent. But that is not what you said.
“parts per gram” mean NOTHING.
Alternatively. % means something, but again, only if you say my weight, or volume, or mole, or equivalent. Which I said BY WEIGHT right up in the beginning.
What I said is scientifically meaningful. You, trying to act like you knew more than me, spit out a meaningless description of a measurement and said, “that’s how it’s measured.” Did you make a mistake? If so, own it.
I saw a real contrail the other day. It was almost refreshing the way it dissipated after a couple of minutes instead of spreading out and covering the sky for hours. What’s old is new again.
And to be clearer, a “part per gram” is not a “mg per gram” or a “mole per gram” or a “milliequivalent per gram” - all of which would actually have clear scientific meaning. But none of the above is what you said. You said “parts per gram” and “that’s how it’s measured.”
Sorry. That’s just wrong.
I actually did make one math mistake which no one has pointed out so far. Not sure if anyone caught it. Did you?
I wonder if anyone ever built a font called Omar Serif?
OK. Sorry. It’s driving me nuts - can’t wait to see if anyone even cares to look or even if they do if they’ll find it.
Post #78
“Yeah - that’s mg/L or parts per million - they are the same thing.”
That’s wrong, probably by less that a factor of ten in almost any real-world case, but it’s wrong. I typed mg/L, but in my brain, because these discussions are so often about aqueous solutions, my brain saw mg/kg, because one L of water is a kg. The latter is absolutely true - mg/kg is absolutely a part per million by weight. But an mg/L isn’t the same thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.