Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Merrick

And to be clearer, a “part per gram” is not a “mg per gram” or a “mole per gram” or a “milliequivalent per gram” - all of which would actually have clear scientific meaning. But none of the above is what you said. You said “parts per gram” and “that’s how it’s measured.”

Sorry. That’s just wrong.

I actually did make one math mistake which no one has pointed out so far. Not sure if anyone caught it. Did you?


98 posted on 07/10/2026 8:23:48 AM PDT by Merrick (It's a car - that runs on water, man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: Merrick

OK. Sorry. It’s driving me nuts - can’t wait to see if anyone even cares to look or even if they do if they’ll find it.

Post #78

“Yeah - that’s mg/L or parts per million - they are the same thing.”

That’s wrong, probably by less that a factor of ten in almost any real-world case, but it’s wrong. I typed mg/L, but in my brain, because these discussions are so often about aqueous solutions, my brain saw mg/kg, because one L of water is a kg. The latter is absolutely true - mg/kg is absolutely a part per million by weight. But an mg/L isn’t the same thing.


100 posted on 07/10/2026 8:32:16 AM PDT by Merrick (It's a car - that runs on water, man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson