Posted on 06/08/2026 7:47:29 AM PDT by Red Badger
President Trump blasted the Los Angeles Mayor election on Monday after Democratic City Councilwoman Nithya Raman overtook highly popular Republican Spencer Pratt in the ongoing total vote count, which remains ongoing six days after the election.
As The Gateway Pundit reported on Sunday, Nithya Raman was projected to advance to a runoff election with incumbent Mayor Karen Bass after another fraudulent vote result dump gave her a lead over Spencer Pratt.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/breaking-rigged-election-buries-la-mayoral-candidate-spencer/
Raman came back from a roughly 40,000-vote deficit after Los Angeles spent five days counting the late mail-in ballots received after Election Day. With an estimated 146,000 ballots remaining to count, Raman now leads Pratt by more than 3,000 votes.
Pratt dominated with mail-in ballots received by election day, but those received after election day have heavily favored the Democrats. Where did these votes come from? How can anybody trust these results?
Trump responded to the impossible results coming in after election day, writing, "No way this could have happened. Rigged Election!"
Trump told reporters last week in the Oval Office, "You see what's happening in California. They're rigging the election!"
Trump later went off on NBC's Kristen Welker over the rigged California election during a bombshell sit-down interview. "“Do you think it’s appropriate that they have an election, and five days later, they’re nowhere close to picking a winner?" Trump said of the outrageous vote-counting process. "You’re either crooked, or you’re stupid!"
“Your elections are crooked, and you’re crooked, and meet the press is crooked, and so is ABC and CBS and CNN,” Trump added before storming off the set.
First Assistant US Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli announced on Friday that his office is conducting “multiple election fraud investigations” with the FBI and a “comprehensive audit of California’s voter rolls” with the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division.
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Whoever is running the fraud system knows nothing about statistics and math stuff..............Just print up a bunch of ballots until their guy or gal wins.
There are a dozen or so OTHER candidates on the ballot that everybody in the media ignores.
I would like to know their percentages and how they changed in ballot dump after ballot dump. They should stay relatively within the same percentages across the board.
I’d bet they get ZERO increases, which should tell everyone tha this is fraud from the get go.....................
He said those things, but he didn’t “storm off the set”. He was calm as he rose from his chair, and gently placed his hand on her shoulder as if to say “I know it’s not your fault you’re stupid and work for a crooked network”.

"It's a miracle!"
Thanks for the information that Harris was installed by voter fraud. I thought she was elected by the organic stupidity of California voters. I wasn’t aware that she was losing the AG race badly before receiving mass fraudulent voter dumps.
I also didn’t realize that California’s systemic election corruption went back that far. I am not surprised at all, but that was back in 2010. True, that is not long ago but thanks for filling in those details for me.
Not surprising in the least but good to learn. Thanks.
my vote has not yet been counted. Pratt, of course. i will write him in in November if faced w/Raman and Bass.
“Can anyone explain how Bass’ share of the vote collapsed way down in these last batch of ballots? That it’s pretty much impossible right?”
Anything that changes votes radically away from what the first 50% was is statistically impossible.
It violates the most basic concepts of sampling.
But, to answer your question, the later-counted votes were prepared to give the desired effect.
Statistically unlikely...but not impossible.
All of these are allegations. Where is the evidence? Where is the proof?
What was obvious was that both Raman and Bass had a ground game. Pratt did not have a ground game. His was a screen game.
The fact is that a good ground game is the best way to prevent vote fraud. And a good ground game is the best way to prove vote fraud when it does exist.
MAGA has no ground game (maybe with rare exceptions). It does not have evidence (and rare anecdotes). It does not have proof. I believe there was vote fraud. But that is a long distance away from proof.
I knew going into it that Pratt was dead meat and California election fraud would eliminate him.
I am laughing at Hilton who thinks his current margin of victory is insurmountable and he is a lock to be in the general election in November with Becerra. Hilton acts clueless as if California can’t manufacture enough fake fraudulent ballots over the next 35 days to eliminate him.
Remeber my words above when it happens and Steyer runs against Becerra instead of Hilton. Hilton is in for a rude awakening when California fraudulently fixes this primary to eliminate him. It is going to happen.
No margin of victory is insurmountable by California with a month to manufacture new fake ballots from the dead and the homeless.
Short of throwin’ lead, what is the immediate solution to the theft of your self-determination?
It may be shocking to you but crooks tend to hide the proof they stole something.
Harris isn’t the only one:
From Revolver:
“California Democrats have been using mail-in ballots and ballot harvesting to win local elections for eons... It was the 2018 midterms, and everyone went to bed believing a slew of Republicans had won their U.S. congressional seats. But when America woke up, they discovered that mail-in ballots had changed everything. Days later, all the ‘victorious’ Republicans were declared losers and sent packing.”
This happened in Red Orange County in So Cal where Republicans were ‘sent packing’ two weeks after their election victories after all the mail-in ballots were “counted.”
Lawsuits. That’s what they do.........
“still nothing will change”
*************
Even in the face of dysfunction, chaos and corruption it won’t change. They are stuck on stupid.
The only thing that changes will be their finding new ways to destroy LA.
I remember that commercial!! Completely forgot about it until just now.
The Supreme Court can change the definition of Election Day and whether mail-in ballots must be received by that date or simply postmarked by then. Whether that will impact the ongoing debacle in CA is uncertain but it will effect the future.
The Supreme Court can change the definition of Election Day and whether mail-in ballots must be received by that date or simply postmarked by then. Whether that will impact the ongoing debacle in CA is uncertain but it will effect the future.
The Supreme Court can change the definition of Election Day and whether mail-in ballots must be received by that date or simply postmarked by then. Whether that will impact the ongoing debacle in CA is uncertain but it will effect the future.
Quislings like you are why we are this predicament in the first place.
Any question worth asking, is worth asking five times, eh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.