Replies

"The Supreme Court can change the definition of Election Day and whether mail-in ballots must be received by that date or simply postmarked by then. Whether that will impact the ongoing debacle in CA is uncertain but it will effect the future."

It was received by Election Day for eons, for all of US history, until the Democrats realized they could no longer win without cheating.

Soros made targeted investments in district attorneys, prosecutors, and Secretary of State, and his payoffs have been tremendous.

However, SCOTUS is sitting on a gamechanger, and the timing could not be more perfect, as the decision in Watson v. Republican National Committee is due soon, likely one of the next 3 Mondays.

In 2024, the Republican National Committee and the Mississippi Republican Party challenged Mississippi's ballot-receipt deadline in federal court.
A federal district court initially upheld Mississippi's law.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit later ruled that federal election-day statutes require ballots for federal offices to be received by Election Day, effectively invalidating Mississippi's grace period for federal elections.
Mississippi Secretary of State Michael Watson petitioned the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case in November 2025.
During oral arguments in March, the conservatives appeared to have their majority already in place. Alito, Gorsuch, Barrett, dragging along Kavanaugh. Roberts will likely side with the ninnys.

States that currently count mail ballots received after Election Day (provided they were mailed or postmarked by Election Day) would have to stop doing so for races involving federal offices.

However, Alito could snake Roberts and issue a sweeping decision imposing the rule on ALL elections.