Candace Owens Suggests Charlie Kirk Was Time Traveler That "Agents" Followed "Since He Was Young" To "Change An Outcome"

Not the Bee ^ | 1/15/2026

[Republican Wildcat]

Candace Owens is now pushing that Charlie Kirk was a TIME TRAVELLER - and that he had "AGENTS" (yes, like the Matrix) monitoring him from childhood - and that he was killed because he tried to DISTURB space-time continuum. No, I'm not kidding.

[Texas Eagle]

What’s the purpose of time traveling if you can’t even prevent yourself from being shot?

[Seruzawa]

I guess her elevator doesn’t go to the top.

[Mastador1]

Frickin Bitch gets crazier every damn day, which is a neat trick because she was already certifiable months and months ago.

[9YearLurker]

Ha!

(Not persuaded re: Macron’s wife, but surely she’s right that the official Charlie Kirk narrative stinks.)

[madison10]

Many were saying that last October, maybe even September. Her mental issues are obvious.

[Fuzz]

‘ but surely she’s right that the official Charlie Kirk narrative stinks.)’

She is saying he’s a time traveler.

That’s worse than any ‘official’ narrative , it’s insane.

[Joe 6-pack]

"Don’t the theoretical physicists say that travel to the future is more likely to be possible than travel to the past?"

Nothing theoretical about it. I'm traveling into the future as I type this, and will be even further into the future by the time you read it!

[Sequoyah101]

She gets my vote. For insanity that is. Not when a remotely credible person.

[cgbg]

Candace on the Charlie Kirk and Turning Point situation reminds me of those conspiracy theorists you see in the movies—whiteboards covering four walls with maps and pins and string that looks like spaghetti.

She may not realize it—but she is doing comedy at this point.

[Jamestown1630]

Well, we’re all on the way to the future just by being alive in a material universe.

But will we ever be able to ‘jump’ ahead say, 50 years, on a whim?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Leap_(1989_TV_series)

[daniel1212]

Very sad.Type of old National Enquirer material.
She also says agents are following her.

[9YearLurker]

You really buy the Kirk cover story? Have you paid any attention to it?

As to Candace, I don’t know whether she is, like most prominent podcasters, a limited-hangout psyop. But such are some of the best sources we have anyway, as long as we sift through the bad to the good.

Freepers might like her interview tonight, talking with Myron Gaines about feminism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2T39-oADLj0

[cgbg]

I have not paid a lot of attention to the Kirk situation—except hearing what Candace has claimed.

She has poisoned the well.

[rockabyebaby]

Candace Owens Suggests Charlie Kirk Was Time Traveler That "Agents" Followed "Since He Was Young" To "Change An Outcome"

Sure, nod nod, wink wink. WTH is wrong with her? LSD? PCP? Ketamine? Cocaine???

[fr_freak]

I’ve been following Candace’s podcast for a while. The Babylon Bee article was written by idiots who don’t seem to be able to differentiate when a person is being serious or whimsical. Candace was clearly just screwing around when she brought up the Matrix, in the vein of “Wouldn’t it be weird if we were all just in a giant computer simulation?” She used the term “Agents” to describe the people she felt were acting as “handlers” to Charlie Kirk as a means to continue the metaphor. Whoever wrote that article is either low IQ or is so old that he can’t remember what it’s like to converse in a youthful fashion.

The more I see the all out war on Candace, the more I get the feeling that I am watching an information psy-op in real time. What shocks me, but shouldn’t after seeing how many idiots bought, and STILL buy, into the whole COVID thing, is how many people even here just eat up whatever slop is fed to them. Not only do they accept misinformation without question, but they get OUTRAGED by it. It is clear manipulation, and most just follow along like dogs on a leash.

Here’s what I do know:

1) Charlie Kirk was an extremely influential, up-and-coming, conservative voice, who was reaching young people in ways almost no one else could

2) Charlie’s assassination was freaking weird. The circumstances of his murder were weird, the behavior of his “friends” was weird, both during the assassination and after, his wife is weird, the TPUSA organization, worth tens of millions, has multiple shady characters doing shady things, and the people who surrounded Kirk an TPUSA have some bizarre connections

3)Kirk’s murder was so bizarre that people have to come up with unlikely scenarios just to explain simple things like why there wasn’t an exit wound for a 30.06 round

4) Despite all this, Candace is the only person actively investigating Kirk’s death.

5) There is a coordinated effort to ridicule and misrepresent everything Candace says. The last time I saw a coordination of effort this widespread, dangerous experimental pharmaceuticals were being forced on the world as a solution to a pandemic hoax.

[cgbg]

I listened to two entire Candace shows today—the “time travel show” and the Fort Huachuca show.

While the time travel got all the headlines the Fort Huachuca was even kookier.

I dare anyone to listen to this show and tell me Candace is not a clown:

https://rumble.com/v74dvu8-oh-snap-we-were-right-about-for-for-huachuca.-candace-ep-291.html

[9YearLurker]

It’s possible that’s what her job was, but it is clear that this is another patsy/coverup situation. And she was close to Kirk for a long time.

If you’re hearing about her position on Kirk from Alex Jones, Robert Barnes or the like, you’re also getting a biased slant.

[cgbg]

I never pay attention to second or third hand opinions.

I watched two of her shows today—and based on that formed my own opinion.

She is a bona fide kook.

[fr_freak]

I dare anyone to listen to this show and tell me Candace is not a clown:

Feel free to get specific about what you think makes her a "clown". She speculates on a lot of things that would have seemed ridiculous 10 years ago, but we live in a freaking clown world now, and nothing would surprise me.

I think the most important thing to understand about Candace is that her profession is primarily show business. As such, she speculates about things and dramatizes things, but I have yet to see her make any firm claims about anything frivolous.

What I do see is that foolish people who have made it their mission to discredit her are either incapable of understanding her informal style, or are deliberately misinterpreting it. I'll give you an example:

Candace will say something like "Gosh, sometimes it just seems like aliens have just come down from space and taken some kind of mind control over a lot of people."

This will be reported by some frothing-at-the-mouth idiot as "Candace thinks that aliens are controlling the world ohmygod ohmygod ohmygod! She's crazy!"

[cgbg]

Sure—in the show she used a lot of innuendo to suggest that Erika Kirk and backers of Turning Point were involved in child trafficking.

She danced around a lot—but that was the bottom line.

She had zero proof—and every single individual named in that show would be totally reasonable if they hired attorneys and sued her for every dime she has.

It was despicable.