Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Solid-State Batteries Are FINALLY Here - Investigation
https://youtu.be/O8PjlwZVLVE ^

Posted on 01/10/2026 9:12:57 AM PST by BereanBrain

Times, they are a changing....Reminber i told you so...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: batteries; donutlabs; ev; fakenews; finland; firetraps; reminber; solidstatebatteries; solidstatebattery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: BereanBrain
My car charges overnight. I never visit gas stations, unless I am driving my Mustang GT. (350 mile range).

I know! I know!

Let's strip mine the whole world for battery materials and cover what's left with solar panels so we can drive around between strip mines under the shade of solar panels and wind turbines!

That's so much better than using "fossil" fuels that aren't "fossil' and that don't require converting the entire planet to the service of EVs.

61 posted on 01/10/2026 10:42:21 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Ah, the unobtanium battery!

* All solid state battery
* Ultra high energy density: 400 W-h/kg
* Energy capacity: 125 W-h
* Ultra fast charging speeds.
* Full discharge or charge in 5 minutes
* 100k cycles regardless of charge / discharge profile
* Safe. No risk of fire or explosion when damaged. No risk of thermal runaway. Non-combustible, non-flammable.
* No dendrite formation
* Puncture resistant
* 99% capacity from -30C to 100C
* Price-parity with lithium batteries
* Zero nickel, cobal and lithium

My first reaction too :-) Time will tell. And my money will stay in my pocket until Time starts blabbing. But, we've been waiting for that super battery that is only tens years away to be invented for the last two decades. Maybe this is the year.


62 posted on 01/10/2026 10:44:15 AM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I prefer nuclear power.

you are arguing a straw-man argument.


63 posted on 01/10/2026 10:49:13 AM PST by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
I did not watch the whole thing, but if I have to buy a Lucent for access (a nice car, admittedly), it is well-priced out of my market.

Certain EVs will come way down in price. I think even as soon as this year.

I also do not like the over-reliance on computers and tech in modern cars (ironic, as my employer makes EV, ICE and hybrid chips). I will compromise to get modern electronic ignition and fuel injection.

I worked for GM when Cadillac first came out with their electronic fuel injection. And, it was a disaster. "This is a splash in the pan and will never work! Give us carburetors!" This was the battle cry back then. Well, guess what - it wasn't just a splash in the pan.

Also, modern automotive drivetrain design has reached a point where your average owner can no longer service his own car. And, they were designed that way. This will also be a death blow to the piston engine automobile. Enter the EV with 100k mile warranties and about 36 drivetrain parts. All modular, and all easily serviceable.

64 posted on 01/10/2026 10:49:58 AM PST by eastexsteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: so_real

Take a look a the efficiency of the first gasoline engine versus the ones today. Model 5 had maybe 20 HP, got 13-20 MPG (downhill). Now you can get 200-300 HP, ad 17-27 MPG. It took us 100 years to get there.

Now look at the speed of innovation in batteries and electric motors.

Average people don’t like change.


65 posted on 01/10/2026 10:53:20 AM PST by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: BereanBrain

If somebody tried to regulate you into trading in your horse in 1910 for a auto, would you still be mad?“

Hell yes l would. You should be too. It’s called freedom of choice and people died for it. If you don’t mind being shoved into a golf cart move to Europe but leave us alone.


66 posted on 01/10/2026 10:56:08 AM PST by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: BereanBrain

Too bad for the oversized electric golf cart fanbois that they let their liberal cult adopt EVs as a religious symbol.


67 posted on 01/10/2026 11:02:06 AM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BereanBrain

My biggest beef with batteries is fire. Anything that can't be put out once ignited (I've seen lithium burn underwater) doesn't belong in my garage. And now with domestic enemies, and guerilla warfare, and people hacking driverless vehicles ... well ... anything that can be so easily weaponized is foolish to make ubiquitous. But if the battery technology has advanced to the level touted in this video, I'll get as excited as you. I've bookmarked the Verge website. If they start shipping product using the Donut battery, I might just dip my toe in that water and see how real it is for myself.


68 posted on 01/10/2026 11:03:36 AM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: BereanBrain

I just bought a 2026 KIA Sportage Gas version and not the hybrid or plug in hybrid. who needs the DEI aggravation.


69 posted on 01/10/2026 11:07:28 AM PST by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BereanBrain; All
Thank you for posting BereanBrain.

Anti-EV folks, watch this video


FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

I'm not anti-EV per se. But one problem with current EV technology is that, as a consequence of very poor public utility planning by constitutionally undefined political parties who probably aren't concerned about the well-being of the citizens, please consider the following.

Democratic Party-pirated California for example, has unthinkingly shown that California's power grid cannot handle the slow-charging EVs that are on the road now.

So while the new, fast-charging battery shown in the video is commendable evidence that the wrinkles are being ironed out of EV technology, it remains that California's Democratic Party-neglected power grid can't even handle today's slow-charging EV batteries.

70 posted on 01/10/2026 11:09:10 AM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BereanBrain

We have had similar “breakthroughs” announced with great fanfare that never came to anything. I remain skeptical until this can be shown to work on a large scale.


71 posted on 01/10/2026 11:09:48 AM PST by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BereanBrain

“Now you can get 200-300 HP, ad 17-27 MPG. It took us 100 years to get there”

So much wrong with that point. They have had 1000 HP motors for almost 100 years. The rest of your points are just as easily shot down. If you want to live where you are stripped of choice you are in the wrong country.


72 posted on 01/10/2026 11:34:13 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
I don’t want to wade thru 45 minutes of babbling

Understandable.

I did watch the whole thing. Although they were short on technical details to protect their IP (Intellectual Property) what they were willing to disclose was pretty interesting.

Patent pending status does provide some protection, but it is prudent to hold off to actual issuance of the patent or require an NDA before disclosing. I've done the same on my own IP recently.

The secret sauce seems to be the solid electrolyte.

Given the discussion it sounds like a polymer with carbon nanotubes incorporated into the molecules. If that stuff is a little bit squishy and springy that would solve the contact to not perfectly smooth electrodes, and the thermal mismatch issues.

They assert there is no cobalt, nickel, or lithium in the cell.

I'm guessing they are using sodium for the active ion. Dirt cheap, and the slightly fatter atomic size helps keep it from penetrating the separator or growing dendrites in it.

My take and opinions, YMMV...

73 posted on 01/10/2026 11:42:41 AM PST by null and void (To them, words are merely a means to deceive humans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fini

And likely that doesn’t account for what gets stolen for drug money.


74 posted on 01/10/2026 12:07:14 PM PST by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

I am talking about an economic vehicle that you drive that is mass produced.

How many thousands of miles do you get on a 1000 HP V8? Good luck with 50K and that’s with exotic metal doping. You probably know race cars get an engine teardown every few thousand miles. Not Economical....


75 posted on 01/10/2026 12:09:35 PM PST by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

The subject was EFFICIENCY not raw HP. (i.e. gallons per HP).


76 posted on 01/10/2026 12:11:07 PM PST by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: BereanBrain

If you want/need a 1000 HP motor economy is not a main concern. EV’s are not the efficient nirvana the promoters claim. Producing sufficient electricity for millions of EV cars flips the calculous of comparison especially in cold climates. In the end it should be about choice but that is not good enough for the rats and the climate nazi’s.


77 posted on 01/10/2026 12:36:01 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Slingwing

“and so far they have all failed in the end.”

Tesla hasn’t failed.
They have bigger market cap than Toyota, GM, Ford and a few others combined.
Its one reason Musk is so rich.


78 posted on 01/10/2026 12:44:20 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ken H; BereanBrain

“can be fully charged in five minutes”

Let’s see....

Assuming a battery of 100KWH (Tesla size). With 240 volts, you would need 100,000/240 = 417 amps for an hour. To do it in 5 minutes you would need 12 times that, or 5000 amps!!

If you use a voltage 4 times that which is what the superchargers use, you still would need to pump through 1250 amps.

You would need a cable the size of a fire hose, and I doubt the battery could handle being flooded with all those electrons in such a short time.

Or did I screw up somewhere?


79 posted on 01/10/2026 1:02:20 PM PST by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BereanBrain

EV’s will never be mainstream, except among the “look at me, I care” elitists.


80 posted on 01/10/2026 1:25:58 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson