Posted on 12/27/2025 8:43:59 PM PST by libh8er
A fringe white nationalist is generating millions of views of anti-Indian content. Research reveals 61% of his engagement comes from bot farms in Pakistan, Indonesia, and Russia. There is a particular moment in every demagogue’s career when rhetoric turns into a project. Not the early period of noisy adolescence, when insult functions merely as theatre, or even the intermediate stage when vitriol becomes an organising principle. No, the moment that matters is when hatred acquires a constituency, when contempt ceases to be performance and instead aspires to become politics. Nick Fuentes has arrived at that moment.
For years, Fuentes existed as an almost inevitable cultural artefact, the genial racist, the laughing fascist, the tailored heir to the ruin of Charlottesville, someone whose worldview was so deliberately adolescent that one could almost mistake it for immaturity rather than ideology. He was treated as a spectacle, a punchline with teeth. He was too fringe to shape policy, too toxic to be invited indoors, too loud to fade away. He was, like many figures of the post-alt-right diaspora, a professional disturbance.
That era is over.
Fuentes is no longer just yelling. He is selecting enemies. He is no longer merely sneering. He is curating targets. He is no longer ranting for applause. He is building an architecture of hate. And Indians, specifically Hindu Indians, Indian-Americans, and the civic space they inhabit, now stand squarely in his crosshairs.
This was not accidental. It was deliberate. And it did not emerge in an ideological vacuum, but as the product of narcissism, cultural insecurity, racial fantasy, geopolitical utility, and the cold, mechanised logic of algorithmic amplification.
It is important to be clear here. Fuentes did not discover racism against Indians. He noticed that it was available.
The primary rhetorical engine driving anti-Indian sentiment is the “Great Replacement Theory” (GRT) applied to the labour market. The Centre for the Study of Hate and Extremism (CSO) released a report analysing anti-Indian racism on X (formerly Twitter) between July and September 2025. The data is stark: narratives framing Indians as “invaders” and “job thieves” accounted for 69.7% of high-engagement racist posts, generating over 111.8 million views.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
We need to not bring in foreign workers, as we have plenty.
I know plenty of H1-B workers, and the ones I know from EY got $60,000-65,000 while EY made much more off them, reselling them as temporary workers to the corporation I work for.
They routinely stayed in apartments or homes in which they roomed together, 4-6 in a place, all sharing the rent, and they stayed in hotels in town the whole time.
The strict purpose is to have cheap foreign workers to compete with local citizens. That is it.
Companies are all in the same boat, in gavingv to pay the new $100,000 fee for any H-1B workers they bring in. The H-1B program was intended for shortages in the U.S. labor pool for specialized skills, not as a device for lowering wages by increasing the supply.
[Vance’s family - his mother and father - has inferior genetics compared to Newsom’s elite family. That does not mean we will vote for Newsom.]
I was informed by an Indian coworker that he and his compatriots paid the hiring manager for their jobs. So, it’s not competence, it’s bribery. This is not something that is normal for Americans who’ve been here for a few generations. However, as I was told, it is normal in India. Don’t give me the “best” worker bull, I know better.
Because the White racists they are addressing will, of course, always assiduously differentiate between Indians and Pakistanis!
/sarcasm
Regards,
Ditto. And the Silicon Valley? They destroyed it. I don't think it can ever come back.
[I was informed by an Indian coworker that he and his compatriots paid the hiring manager for their jobs. So, it’s not competence, it’s bribery. This is not something that is normal for Americans who’ve been here for a few generations. However, as I was told, it is normal in India. Don’t give me the “best” worker bull, I know better.]
No one needs some random eCeleb to tell them to hate Indians .
‘It’s obvious that Fuentes is a Soros Plant.’
That’s absolutely right.
I have read dozens of different allegations about Fuentes from every possible source left and right.
None of them have been proven.
For those who want to hear what Fuentes has to say instead of slandering him over and over and over here is his latest:
https://rumble.com/v73j7yo-we-must-demand-more-from-the-gop-in-2026.html
Not a Fuentes fan but when it comes to H1B -- Over 1 million Indians hold temporary US work visas, with Indians constituting the largest share of H-1B recipients, estimated at 71% of all approved H-1B applications in recent years.
Americans are tired of foreigners invading our nation illegally or through an H1B system that screws Americans. More than the foreigners, we are tired of politicians and corporations who are selling the American worker down the road. Capital punishment for these enablers would suit me just fine.
If you were smarter that the American corporations, you would be running a competing company with all NBC workers. But alas you are just an anonymous keyboard jockey.
If any company hires incompetent workers, they won’t survive long in today’s highly competitive tech world. Three of the most profitable tech companies in the entire world are run by Indian CEO’s. Google, Microsoft & IBM.
I was a corporate executive in an American outfit during my working years. In my corporation only thing which mattered was bottom line. We hired workers who could do the job for wages we could pay and survive the competition. Age, sexual preference, race or national origin was not a factor. We were running a company to make some profit, not to work on social issues.
You are not smarter than the American corporations. If you were you would be running a corporation based on hiring only American born workers. But you obviously are not smarter than American corporations.
Essentially the country should be limited to those with a Christian ethics background.
I watched the clip. He says, "There's something weird about Vance" and gives no explanation as to why he thinks so. He doesn't like Vance's 'Indian' wife and 'Indian' kids supposedly because she's not European or Christian. I was surprised that Vance's Catholicism wasn't savaged - maybe that's on a different clip. I noticed he likes to throw around a lot of F-bombs while speaking to the public, which says something about his character. I wonder what he would think about Jesus, who wasn't a European and quite possibly had brown skin and dark eyes like Usha?
There are things Fuentes says that ae worth considering but on a whole, I'm not a fan.
They don’t need bots. The street shitters are easy enough to despise without help.
Fuentes is retarded and gay.
That particular Fuentes issue with Vance has to be given full context to be understood.
This article gives the background:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/21/world/asia/trump-tariffs-vance-modi-india.html
Fuentes was focusing on the Indian garb worn by the family—especially the children.
His view was that perhaps the children were being raised in Indian rather than US customs as Vance was being too deferential to his wife’s wishes in that regard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.