Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado plans to phase out natural gas heating in homes, prompting many reader questions. We have answers.
Colorado Sun ^ | December 17, 2025 | Michael Booth

Posted on 12/22/2025 7:07:03 AM PST by Red Badger

What about propane for rural folks? Do we have to give up gas furnaces and stoves? Who will pay? Will electric bills go way up?

Flames emerge from burners on a natural gas stove, Wednesday, June 21, 2023, in Walpole, Mass. Gas and construction trade groups sued to block New York state’s controversial ban on gas stoves and furnaces in new buildings. (AP Photo/Steven Senne) Credit: AP

================================================================================

News that Colorado has set hard target dates for an end to burning natural gas in our daily lives prompted many “wait, what?” questions from Colorado Sun readers. And we are here to help.

The Public Utilities Commission approved a “Clean Heat Plan” that calls for the state’s natural gas utilities to cut emissions from delivering and burning natural gas by 41% in the next 10 years, and all natural gas emissions entirely by 2050. We talked to state regulators, clean energy officials and advocates, and consumer groups for answers to your most urgent questions.

Q: What about propane? Many rural and mountain Colorado homes have a propane tank. Must those homes convert to expensive electric heating, hot water and cooking appliances, and if so, who pays?

A: The newly approved plans do not cover propane tanks or propane distributors. They task the big utilities delivering natural gas to homes in pipelines with the mandate to hit the targets. That means Xcel, Atmos Energy and Black Hills Energy. Homes using existing propane tanks are not directly affected, though clean energy advocates still encourage those homeowners to seek rebates and other help in converting to more efficient electrical appliances that will be cheaper to operate.

Q: As a homeowner, do I have to do something about my gas appliances or furnace?

A: The new rules are not aimed at homeowners. They are requirements for the utilities. The utilities will be the ones planning internal changes and consumer and business incentives to both limit harmful methane leaks and convince people to switch to electric appliances. Utilities will still be delivering natural gas to consumers, but they must now start taking concrete steps toward gradually reducing use and emissions. If a utility believes it will take hundreds of millions of dollars in rebate incentives to get an adequate number of installed electric appliances, thereby cutting fossil fuel emissions, they would also have to get that spending and potential rate increases approved by the PUC. Under current rules, no one is showing up at your door to rip out a gas water heater against your will.

Q: If I am interested in making appliance changes but don’t have the capital to do it, can I get help?

A: Yes, from multiple sources. In fact, the Colorado Energy Office recently announced new rebates aimed at low- and middle-income households in mobile or manufactured homes. Each utility also has pools of money for rebates for electric appliances. Nonprofits and government agencies often have appliance and weatherization programs that can provide thousands of dollars for projects. The energy office recommends you start here.

Q: Won’t the transformation to all-electrical energy overwhelm current generating capacity, and also raise my electric bills?

A: Certainly the growth in electrical demands — from a host of new EVs plugged in, to giant power-sucking data centers for AI, to electric heat pumps and tankless water heaters — will put more strain on Colorado’s power generation. Utilities are moving to add more generating capacity. For now generation capacity is adequate but tight. That’s why when Xcel’s Comanche 3 coal-fired unit went down, the PUC approved keeping Unit 2 running even though it was supposed to close Dec. 31.

Some groups — not just environmental advocates, but businesses as well — question whether utilities are overstating electric demand, and whether they’ve properly managed the power plants they’ve already got. Expect more questions and more reports on whether the growth in solar and wind clean power sources can match growing demand.

As for rising costs?

“I think people have an assumption that if we’re adding new load to the electric system, that that is going to add a lot of cost. And in fact, that can be true, but it isn’t always true,” Colorado Energy Office director Will Toor said.

He cites studies showing that even without growth in electrical demand, there are fixed costs required in coming decades that would raise consumer electric rates. Those unavoidable costs include a vastly upgraded power line system throughout Colorado to link new solar and wind farms to the grid, as well as hardening transmission lines against growing wildfire risk. If demand is stagnant, then current consumers will have to pay those extra unavoidable costs. If demand grows in a planned and controlled way, Toor said, then the new consumers will help pay for those fixed costs and limit price increases for all.

Q: Can the electrical system handle the planned increase in demand if we give up fossil fuels for cars and homes?

A: It will take planning and growth of clean resources, but the demand news is not all bad, Toor explained. For example, people with EVs tend to plug their cars in the garage overnight, when overall electrical demand drops. Moreover, Colorado is currently a “summer peaking” state, meaning more demand spikes happen in high summer heat when people come home in the afternoon and turn the air conditioning on. If installation of electric home heat pumps and water heaters means more electrical demand in cold winter months, much of that capacity already existed for the summer spikes.

Spreading out the changeover from natural gas through 2035 and 2050 targets, Toor noted, means demand will grow more gradually.

“You still need to make some distribution level investments,” he said. “But when it comes to sort of the big transmission and generation, we’ve got excess capacity in the winter.”

Q: If everything in the Clean Heat plan is so reasonable, why did two state agencies want the timetable for the natural gas switchover to be less aggressive?

A: The PUC settled on a 41% target in cutting natural gas-related emissions by 2035. Environmental groups wanted at least 50% out of the system by then. The energy office and the Air Pollution Control Division, meanwhile, argued for a 30% target for the interim 2035 year.

“The 41% target, from our perspective, is a pretty challenging target for utilities. We certainly hope that utilities get there. I think we thought that 30% was probably more realistic,” Toor said. Reaching the more aggressive target may prompt the utilities to seek more rate increases to pay for their appliance rebates and system changes.

That said, Toor added, the PUC may have a more comprehensive view of cost pressures. Maintaining natural gas systems and extending them to new houses and buildings also require major investments from utilities, Toor noted. Environmental groups call those “stranded costs,” for example paying hundreds of millions of dollars for a pipeline to deliver less and less natural gas each year as the emissions cuts come into play. The utilities’ ability to now avoid those natural gas investments could free up money to pay for the switch to electricity.

“I’m confident that they will be able to strike the appropriate balance going forward,” Toor said.

=====================================================================

Corrections:

This story was updated Dec. 10, 2025, at 6:58 p.m. to correctly describe the Public Utilities Commission's rationale for allowing the coal-fired Comanche 2 unit to continue operating beyond its Dec. 31 shutdown date.

Type of Story: Q&A

An interview to provide a relevant perspective, edited for clarity and not fully fact-checked.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Health/Medicine; Society; Weather
KEYWORDS: carbonpropaganda; climatehoax; coloradical; colorado; crazytrain; demagogicparty; ecofascism; fakescience; naturalgas; restraintoftrade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last
To: Red Badger

So every time the electricity goes out people will lose heat in their house? I have both plus a fire place. And I can tell you the fireplace does not heat more than a room. Natural gas never goes down. I don’t remember once losing my gas in 64 years. But we lose our electricity about once or twice a year. If one of those is a snow storm it will mean a lot of people are in a world of hurt.

Natural gas is extreme clean burning. It is extremely abundant. If we don’t use it we will just flare it. Which means we will burn it anyway. The world makes natural gas every year when leaves fall off trees or grass turns brown. When cows poop, or if they eat or simply die. Natural gas is either burned or released in this world every day in every part of the world that life exists. Colorado is doing nothing but theater here. Most of the world would die to have the natural gas infrastructure that Denver has. People are nuts.


21 posted on 12/22/2025 7:23:20 AM PST by poinq (thics and customs and did not take an oath to the country. And did not follow the country's traditio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Those outdoor hot tubs and gas grilles will be available cheap for outside buyers.


22 posted on 12/22/2025 7:23:51 AM PST by SunkenCiv (NeverTrumpin' -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I used to live in Colorado Springs while my husband was in the military years ago. I loved that State.

It isn’t at all the same anymore. I still have two sons who live there. Super expensive place to live now.


23 posted on 12/22/2025 7:23:56 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Go electric go broke.


24 posted on 12/22/2025 7:25:03 AM PST by cp124 (Bring back the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Elect Democrats, destroy America.


25 posted on 12/22/2025 7:25:29 AM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Omnivore-Dan

One negative I might add. It’s a lot of work to heat with wood, cutting, splitting, stacking and replenishing the hoops on the porch about once a week. Good exercise though.


26 posted on 12/22/2025 7:26:02 AM PST by Omnivore-Dan (have to )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Anything California does...........


27 posted on 12/22/2025 7:26:08 AM PST by dljordan (Yeah, I'm a Boomer and it's all my fault you whiny little bitch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

“Let them freeze in the dark.”

Thanks, I appreciate it.


28 posted on 12/22/2025 7:26:57 AM PST by dljordan (Yeah, I'm a Boomer and it's all my fault you whiny little bitch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

“Dang - the CaliClowns have totally taken over Colorado!”

There are Coastal and anchor baby clown in our legislature. It’s women voters.


29 posted on 12/22/2025 7:28:07 AM PST by dljordan (Yeah, I'm a Boomer and it's all my fault you whiny little bitch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dforest

https://coloradosun.com/2025/12/15/colorado-unaffiliated-voters-poll-2025/


30 posted on 12/22/2025 7:28:13 AM PST by Red Badger (Iryna Zarutska, May 22, 2002 Kyiv, Ukraine – August 22, 2025 Charlotte, North Carolina Say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Ah, California East.


31 posted on 12/22/2025 7:28:57 AM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Same here. My dad lived in Loveland for about 10 years. Went out there sometime in the 80’s. Beautiful state, too bad it’s mostly liberal now.


32 posted on 12/22/2025 7:29:18 AM PST by Omnivore-Dan (have to )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Omnivore-Dan
We have 2 woodstoves. We usually only use 1 except on very cold and windy days. We’re fortunate enough to have a good supply, I can cut dead or fallen trees right across the street on about 40 acres of woods, a friend of mine owns the property. We save thousands of dollars in heating from October through March and early April, 6 - 7 months. Nothing like coming in from the cold and warming your bones by the stove

Plus, in an extended winter power outage, you have a source of heat, and can use it for cooking (at least ours can, it has a flat top) and heating water.
33 posted on 12/22/2025 7:30:31 AM PST by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

How do places with a not inconsequential military presence get like this?


34 posted on 12/22/2025 7:31:36 AM PST by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Certainly the growth in electrical demands — will put more strain on Colorado’s power generation.

You don't say...

In California we experience rolling blackouts when the electrical grid is overloaded - I get messages during peak time (over 100 degrees) to NOT plug in EVs or run major appliances.

"Massive San Francisco power outage (Saturday) darkened entire neighborhoods for hours"

(yes, the power company says it's from a "fire")...

As of two hours ago...

"Power nearly restored in San Francisco after widespread outage Saturday"

35 posted on 12/22/2025 7:32:47 AM PST by Bon of Babble (You Say You Want a Revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The Public Utilities Commission approved a “Clean Heat Plan”

Some say cash doesn’t smell but it does.


36 posted on 12/22/2025 7:34:04 AM PST by Vaduz (?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Global warming is a fraud to destroy America.


37 posted on 12/22/2025 7:34:17 AM PST by bray (It's not racist to be racist against races the DNC hates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BikerJoe

Slowly and gradually, then all at once.............


38 posted on 12/22/2025 7:35:20 AM PST by Red Badger (Iryna Zarutska, May 22, 2002 Kyiv, Ukraine – August 22, 2025 Charlotte, North Carolina Say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“We have answers”! That’s an f’n laugh. And the answer is…you’re going to freeze your baguettes off.


39 posted on 12/22/2025 7:36:51 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Omnivore-Dan

I was stationed in Denver in 1974 at the now closed Lowry AFB for Calibration and Microwave Schools when I was in the Marines. That was one beautiful summer.................


40 posted on 12/22/2025 7:38:46 AM PST by Red Badger (Iryna Zarutska, May 22, 2002 Kyiv, Ukraine – August 22, 2025 Charlotte, North Carolina Say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson