|
Posted on 11/30/2025 9:00:00 PM PST by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
A barrage of AI-generated brain rot is haunting children across numerous screens, from personal smartphones to school-issued laptops to televisions.
Social media is adding significantly to that cacophony, making it harder than ever for kids to concentrate. Now, new research from the Karolinska Institute in Sweden and Oregon Health & Science University has found a significant link between screen time and diagnoses of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), suggesting that exposing young brains to social media could have major mental health implications.
As detailed in a new paper published in the journal Pediatrics Open Science, the researchers followed 8,324 children aged nine to ten years old in the US for four years. The children self-reported how much time they spent on social media, watching TV, or playing video games. Their parents also assessed their ability to pay attention and any signs of hyperactivity.
There was a clear link between social media use and an attention deficit, raising the possibility that the constant sensory assault by online services like TikTok and Snapchat could be robbing kids of the ability to focus. That’s in contrast to TV or video game use, which showed no clear association with symptoms of ADHD.
https://futurism.com/health-medicine/social-media-children-adhd
Makes two of us. It's my understanding that technically, Pres. Trump can't intervene in State criminal cases. However, I wonder if the underlying matter being a national election might not MAKE it a federal matter?
If he were to invoke the Insurrection Act, I bet that would change a whole bunch of things.
Sweater season!
Sweater season!
Sweat-er Season!
That'd be the chicks dashing away.
| Date | Charges (<15 chars) | Defense Response (<15 chars) |
|---|---|---|
| 2022-03 | 10-count indict | Motion dismiss |
| 2024-02 | Trial delay | Atty switch |
| 2024-08 | 7 guilty (4F) | 3 acquitted |
| 2024-10 | 9-yr sentence | Bond denied |
| 2025-03 | DOJ review | Appeal filed |
| 2025-07 | Habeas filed | Free speech |
| 2025-10 | Motion strike | Amicus filed |
| 2025-11 | Custody move | Pardon req. |
| 2025-12 | Habeas denied | Renew bond |
| 2026-01 est | Appeal args | Oral pending |
| Outcome | Probability | Key Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Full sentence served (~2033) | 75% | Federal habeas dismissed Dec 8 2025 (Younger abstention); CO upholds ~85% similar felony convictions; repeated bond denials |
| Partial relief via state appeal (reduced sentence or bond) | 15% | Oral args Jan 2026; First Amendment claims weak but possible; new Carvajal proffer untested |
| Federal habeas success after state exhaustion | 7% | DOJ review ongoing but abstention delays; <10% success rate in election-breach habeas cases |
| Gubernatorial or legislative commutation | 2% | Gov. Polis repeatedly rejected transfers/pardons; no precedent |
| Presidential pardon (Trump) | 1% | Submitted Dec 6 2025; legally impossible for state conviction; zero precedent |
| Item | Description | Potential to Alleviate Imprisonment | Hope for Soon Release (Rationale) |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | National election as federal matter (52 U.S.C. § 20701 preemption) | Low – State courts upheld local prosecution; federal habeas dismissed Dec 8 2025 for non-exhaustion | Low (requires state appeal success + new federal action, 1–3 years) |
| b | DOJ prosecution of state officials under 18 U.S.C. § 242 (deprivation of rights under color of law) | Medium – Trump DOJ actively reviewing case for “political persecution” (2025 filing) | Medium (indictments could force vacatur or release within months if pursued) |
| c | DOJ 8th Amendment action (cruel & unusual punishment / prison conditions) | Medium-High – Active DOJ Civil Rights Division probe into Colorado prisons launched Dec 9 2025 after assaults on Peters | High (similar federal oversight cases yielded releases/transfers in weeks–months) |
| d | Trump invoking the Insurrection Act | Low – No legal nexus; Act never used for individual prisoner extraction | Low (unprecedented, politically explosive, no 40-year precedent) |
| e | Intervention by Colorado county sheriffs | Low – No sheriff has indicated willingness; custody already transferred between counties for safety | Low (would create constitutional crisis, no modern precedent) |
| f | Other possible actions (last 40 years) | • State pardon/commutation by Gov. Polis • Federal custody transfer (DOJ request denied 2025) • Successful state appeal or later 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas • DOJ civil-rights settlement forcing release/transfer | Medium overall - 8th Amendment prison probe: weeks–months - Pardon pressure via federalization: months - Appeal/habeas: 1–3 years Best near-term hope rests on active DOJ prison-conditions investigation |
No one wants her out more than the AG, so she can get on to other wins. Peters is held by the Dem Gov-Fag Polis.
Please post the AI description of 18 U.S.C. § 242. I’m not able to copy and paste on this device. ThanQ
Thank you, foldy. Your research and your tables are so helpful. ❤️❤️❤️
😁
| Top 10 Reasons She May Have Embraced Conspiracy Theories | 10 Positive Things About Candace Owens |
|---|---|
|
|
MarQ
NICE!
Watching Trump PA rally on RAV and boy are they bleeping the president.
That’s what I call a salty cracker.
My benign theory of Candace Owens is that she’s very young, and is meeting a tsunami of juicy conspiracy theories that some of us have been following for up to 60+ years (i.e., since JFK assassination).
As a person myself who thinks we are virtually living in a deepfake web of psyops, I am very open to suspending disbelief on some pretty outrageous stuff and letting it stew around in my unconscious mind for a while and see if it finds its way to what I ultimately believe to be true.
In other words, I think she is a sincere but immature conspiracy theorist whose ideas are still sowing their wild oats.
She is not even old enough to understand psychology at the psychoanalytic level.
I will be interested in seeing where her ideas stand when she gets to be about 45.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
