Posted on 08/12/2025 8:52:25 PM PDT by bitt
Abstract:
The incidence of cancers has increased exponentially worldwide since the universal COVID-19 vaccination program began at the end of 2020. These cancers tend to present at an advanced stage, progress rapidly, and occur in younger patients. Additionally, some patients previously in remission have been reported to develop uncontrolled cancer relapses shortly after receiving a COVID-19 vaccination (usually a booster). The temporal association between these cancers and COVID-19 vaccination is undeniable. These observations have given rise to the term “turbo-cancers.”
Although not a formally recognized oncologic classification, the term “turbo cancer” has gained traction among clinicians describing a pattern of unusually aggressive, rapidly progressing cancers—particularly among younger individuals and those previously in remission. In light of these reports, this review explores plausible biological mechanisms and available data to encourage scientific inquiry rather than premature dismissal. According to the Vaccine Event Reporting System (VAERS), the highest reported cancer risks involve the appendix, followed by breast, colorectal, laryngeal, endometrial, and hepatic cancers. A multi-hit hypothesis of oncogenesis—grounded in biological plausibility and supported by safety reports filed to VAERS — has been proposed to explain how COVID-19 vaccination may contribute to cancer development. In addition, we propose that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein directly interferes with the fundamental pathways causing carcinogenesis, namely metabolic reprogramming, cancer stem cell propagation, apoptosis resistance, metastatic potential, and altered immune surveillance. While the prognosis of these cancers is poor, an aggressive therapeutic approach using metabolic and repurposed drugs may offer benefit.
Keywords: Turbo cancers, COVID-19 vaccines, mRNA vaccines, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, carcinogenesis, tumor microenvironment
(Excerpt) Read more at journalofindependentmedicine.org ...
cuz1961 wrote: “Just in case you’re a Muslim jihadi too.”
So, you’d rather play cute games instead of sticking to facts.
Nice projection there Doug
I’m not the one flailing and trying to disrupt the thread by throwing a cloud of squid ink into the water.
Second that!
We’re all postin’ away as well as we can! I am grateful to many who carry on fighting the Covid fightt. :D
Thank you for the kind words.
I STILL see numerous people in my grocery store shopping with a face mask on.
I talked to my source at the hospital about the cancer/covid shots.
The manager of the department had authorized the survey of the relationship of cancer to mRNA vaccine. The numbers were boldly connected. The administration did not want to see the report! The report was depressing and upsetting to the person (my source) so they quit doing it and turned it over to God.
On a similar note, my provider attempted to report all my adverse reactions to the clot shot and the state’s program would not let him report them.
wow- Thanks for that info- I can’t believe that in our day and age, after having gone through many years of docs pulling crap on folks without their knowledge, that they would still to this day attempt to do so- but they sure enough did- Even (once) prestigious medical journals got in on knowingly deceiving the public about things like ivermectin and HCQ, and only now, that all the damage has been done, do they come out and say ‘whoops- we made a mistake, those meds are not actually dangerous’
The vaccines were a forced experiment on the public- plain and simple- and they hid the negative effects- absolutely sick what they did to people-
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.