Posted on 08/12/2025 8:52:25 PM PDT by bitt
Abstract:
The incidence of cancers has increased exponentially worldwide since the universal COVID-19 vaccination program began at the end of 2020. These cancers tend to present at an advanced stage, progress rapidly, and occur in younger patients. Additionally, some patients previously in remission have been reported to develop uncontrolled cancer relapses shortly after receiving a COVID-19 vaccination (usually a booster). The temporal association between these cancers and COVID-19 vaccination is undeniable. These observations have given rise to the term “turbo-cancers.”
Although not a formally recognized oncologic classification, the term “turbo cancer” has gained traction among clinicians describing a pattern of unusually aggressive, rapidly progressing cancers—particularly among younger individuals and those previously in remission. In light of these reports, this review explores plausible biological mechanisms and available data to encourage scientific inquiry rather than premature dismissal. According to the Vaccine Event Reporting System (VAERS), the highest reported cancer risks involve the appendix, followed by breast, colorectal, laryngeal, endometrial, and hepatic cancers. A multi-hit hypothesis of oncogenesis—grounded in biological plausibility and supported by safety reports filed to VAERS — has been proposed to explain how COVID-19 vaccination may contribute to cancer development. In addition, we propose that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein directly interferes with the fundamental pathways causing carcinogenesis, namely metabolic reprogramming, cancer stem cell propagation, apoptosis resistance, metastatic potential, and altered immune surveillance. While the prognosis of these cancers is poor, an aggressive therapeutic approach using metabolic and repurposed drugs may offer benefit.
Keywords: Turbo cancers, COVID-19 vaccines, mRNA vaccines, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, carcinogenesis, tumor microenvironment
(Excerpt) Read more at journalofindependentmedicine.org ...
Never forget what they have done to the world.
From 2022:
“A One Hour Plus Long Video of Athletes Who Have Dropped Dead”
https://odysee.com/@InSearchOfTruth:7/A-One-Hour-Plus-Long-Video-of-Athletes-Who-Have-Dropped-Dead:c
?
cuz1961 wrote: “to do what you do. Which NGO(s) butter your bread ?”
Which anti-vaxxer shysters are your paymasters?
Metrobank wrote: “ You will never understand the damage done.”
The vaccines saved millions of lives.
Leaning Right wrote: “Time will tell if Marik is right about Covid. But his credentials make him worth listening to. Instead he was purged.”
His credentials were rescinded.
> His credentials were rescinded. <
Yes, indeed. That was all part of the purge. What matters is that he had those credentials in the first place.
This unfortunate situation is just like what’s going on with so-called Climate Change. Anyone who dares to question the “settled science” is shouted down. And that’s exactly how science is not supposed to work.
grey_whiskers wrote: “Are these the same type of studies done on Vitamin C (too little, too late, proclaim from above that “it’s proved not to work” ?)”
Show me ‘gold standard’ (randomized controlled trials, placebo controlled, large population) studies that demonstrated the effectiveness of vitamin C in treating COVID.
I no longer trust the journals, nor the pharaco-medical complex.
If there’s no money in in for Big Pharma, they won’t fund studies.
Show me who’s funding YOU, troll-boi.
grey_whiskers wrote: “I no longer trust the journals, nor the pharaco-medical complex. If there’s no money in in for Big Pharma, they won’t fund studies. Show me who’s funding YOU, troll-boi.”
But you trust those selling ineffective remedies like The Wellness Company?
BTW, falsely accusing someone of being paid is a typical liberal response when they run out of facts.
I see you don’t deny being a NGO paid shill.
Is there a legal reason for that ?
Telling
No, I’m just a guy who’s only brother was murdered by ilk with your type of reprobate moral compass.
I’m not antivax, btw.
cuz1961 wrote: “I see you don’t deny being a NGO paid shill. Is there a legal reason for that ?
I don’t see you denying being a NGO paid shill either.
BTW, falsely accusing someone of being paid is a typical liberal response when they run out of facts
You just self-owned, troll-boi.
You accuse the Wellness company of being grifters.
Projecting, of course.
You can go look up how Moderna couldn't get the FDA to approve their studies before getting EUA; and another post where one of their officials brags about the company's vast financial turnaround in the wake of COVID.
Or you can find the article on STAT from 2016 where it talked about the toxic-money-gurbbing cultre at Modnera.
Sod Off, Troll.
grey_whiskers wrote: “You accuse the Wellness company of being grifters.”
Read some online reviews not affiliated with their website.
I’ve never read any reviews either way.
I just note that you trolls react to them with character assassination and to their products, like a vampire exposed to Holy Water.
Troll.
grey_whiskers wrote: “I just note that you trolls react to them with character assassination and to their products, like a vampire exposed to Holy Water.”
So, now “Ultimate Spike Detox”, one of their products is ‘Holly Water’?
You should read up on that company and it’s senior management before defending them.
Look familiar?
“Telling
No...”
Your a lying weasel or a moron .
I contend it’s the former.
Flailing at strawmen, you are.
cuz1961 wrote: “Your a lying weasel or a moron .”
I prefer facts over the anti-vaxxer narratives.
grey_whiskers wrote: “Flailing at strawmen, you are.”
Now you’re projecting.
Why won’t you openly plainly deny being an NGO paid stooge ?
Facts “
Your ilk routinely rapes word definitions
It’s just who you are.
Liars who’s spiritual father is the father of lies
Satan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.