AND YET CONGRESS EXEMPTED THEMSELVES, THEIR STAFF, EMPLOYEES OF PHARMACEUTICAL KORPORATOINS, AND ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS
"Rules for thee but not for me."
Thank you for once again exposing yourself as a paid propagandist for Pfascists.
Posted on 08/01/2025 10:16:17 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
They DO want their child protected. That's why they're not giving them something that has zero liability protection for them but full liability protection for the manufacturer and the government that oversees it.
You more than welcome to assume the liability for it.
I guess you don't get much news up your holler a'?
Dug, haven’t you ever wondered why there are no FDA approved therapeutics for measles or chickenpox...?
Think about that, and you may be able to answer your own question.
No child should be required to be vaccinated for anything not casually transmissible in a school setting as a condition of going to school and medical exemptions should never be questioned.
mewzilla wrote: “Dug, haven’t you ever wondered why there are no FDA approved therapeutics for measles or chickenpox...?”
Why spend millions developing anti-viral therapies for diseases that are easily prevented by safe and effective vaccines? (Other than to appease the egos of a few anti-vaxxers?)
Think about that.
unread wrote: “I guess you don’t get much news up your holler a’?”
Evidently, I get more news than the troglodytes living in your cave.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “They DO want their child protected. That’s why they’re not giving them something that has zero liability protection for them but full liability protection for the manufacturer and the government that oversees it.”
Liability protection was enacted to ensure vaccines were available. This protection was necessary because of the unprincipled doctors like Wakefield who, in conjunction with ambulance chasing lawyers, were initiating unfounded lawsuits that threatened to litigate the vaccine makers out of business.
:)
Ford4000 wrote: “No child should be required to be vaccinated for anything not casually transmissible in a school setting as a condition of going to school and medical exemptions should never be questioned.”
Medical exemptions should be questioned since some doctors will issue such exemptions when they are not justified. And, no, personal objections to vaccinations are not justified. Exemptions for cash are not justified.
The liability exemption wouldn't be necessary if they could make a safe product. Period.
If it's not safe, don't release it.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “The liability exemption wouldn’t be necessary if they could make a safe product. Period. If it’s not safe, don’t release it.”
These products are safe. It’s unreasonable to insist that any product with any side effect should not be on the market. If this standard were applied universally, there would be no cars, no airplanes, no ladders, etc. All firearms would be outlawed. Is that what you want?
That's some serious Cognitive Dissonance: "They're safe but the manufacturers must be exempted from liability."
It’s unreasonable to insist that any product with any side effect should not be on the market.
Unreasonable? According to government and manufacturing korporations. Flip it the correct way; it's unreasonable to insist a victim or their family have no recourse.
And the Jim Jones Jab was not "on the market" - statists were issuing illegal diktats to force victims to take it, not a market choice for consumers. Let's not pretend here.
If this standard were applied universally,
Nice flaw in logic, claiming "applied universally". The reverse is true: A cookie baker has more liability than the manufacturer of experimental physiological treatments.
there would be no cars, no airplanes, no ladders, etc. All firearms would be outlawed.
More flaws in logic and what a twisted line: "If you don't accept this exemption for untested injections from pharmaceutical korporations, you won't have cars, airplanes, ladders" NONE OF WHICH HAVE LIABILITY EXEMPTIONS FOR MANUFACTURERS
Is that what you want?
This is a two-fer; claiming that's what I'm asking for when I'm not. As I wrote, manufacturers of cars, airplanes, and ladders do NOT have liability exemption. Secondly, this is an appeal to personal interest. It doesn't matter what I want. What matters is that we've seen the consequence of korporations having liability exemption for their actions and they should be hauled into court and charged for every coverup, failed data release, and bait and switch they've done.
Every single of their paid propagandists should be charged as well.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “That’s some serious Cognitive Dissonance: “They’re safe but the manufacturers must be exempted from liability.””
No, they must be exempted from frivolous lawsuits.
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program exists to compensate those injured by vaccines. So, there is recourse for those injured by vaccines.
Without the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 there would be no vaccines.
But, you knew these things.
You also know that the COVID vaccines had been tested and that vaccine mandates are legal.
That's a bald-faced lie. They're exempted from liability lawsuits. No court determines if the suits are frivolous because no court hears the case. The exception of course is fraud because fraud vitiates everything.
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program exists to compensate those injured by vaccines. So, there is recourse for those injured by vaccines.
What absolute spin. Sick. Recourse only after the experiment? Sick. And that "recourse" doesn't allow for punitive damages, nor to stop repeat behavior on the part of the perpetrator.
Without the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 there would be no vaccines.
That's an outright lie. Just stop it. There were vaccines for decades before that unconstitutional Act.
But, you knew these things.
No. I know the opposite.
You also know that the COVID vaccines had been tested and that vaccine mandates are legal.
No, no one except Pfizer and MurdeRNA know how much they've been tested because they refuse to release the data (despite being required to for the Emergency Use Authorization) and they intentionally injected the control group.
And the mandates were illegal, AND YOU KNOW THAT. Here's just one example:
https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/paxton-victorious-lawsuit-against-biden-administrations-vaccine-mandate-federal-contractors
AND YET CONGRESS EXEMPTED THEMSELVES, THEIR STAFF, EMPLOYEES OF PHARMACEUTICAL KORPORATOINS, AND ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS
"Rules for thee but not for me."
Thank you for once again exposing yourself as a paid propagandist for Pfascists.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “AND YET CONGRESS EXEMPTED THEMSELVES, THEIR STAFF, EMPLOYEES OF PHARMACEUTICAL KORPORATOINS, AND ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS”
Show me where Congress exempted employees of pharmaceutical corporations and ‘alien invaders’.
The Congress is automatically exempt from dictates from the executive branch, it’s called Separation of Powers, it’s part of the Constitution.
It was supposedly a HEALTH mandate and having even one group exempt from it means all others would be exempted from it.
Get the MMR at 6 months if you want your kid to be ADHD/Retarded. That’s it’s purpose. Tested for 20 years for that effect.
Elites don’t vaccinate their kids.
Be the mark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.