Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke
These products are safe.

That's some serious Cognitive Dissonance: "They're safe but the manufacturers must be exempted from liability."

It’s unreasonable to insist that any product with any side effect should not be on the market.

Unreasonable? According to government and manufacturing korporations. Flip it the correct way; it's unreasonable to insist a victim or their family have no recourse.

And the Jim Jones Jab was not "on the market" - statists were issuing illegal diktats to force victims to take it, not a market choice for consumers. Let's not pretend here.

If this standard were applied universally,

Nice flaw in logic, claiming "applied universally". The reverse is true: A cookie baker has more liability than the manufacturer of experimental physiological treatments.

there would be no cars, no airplanes, no ladders, etc. All firearms would be outlawed.

More flaws in logic and what a twisted line: "If you don't accept this exemption for untested injections from pharmaceutical korporations, you won't have cars, airplanes, ladders" NONE OF WHICH HAVE LIABILITY EXEMPTIONS FOR MANUFACTURERS

Is that what you want?

This is a two-fer; claiming that's what I'm asking for when I'm not. As I wrote, manufacturers of cars, airplanes, and ladders do NOT have liability exemption. Secondly, this is an appeal to personal interest. It doesn't matter what I want. What matters is that we've seen the consequence of korporations having liability exemption for their actions and they should be hauled into court and charged for every coverup, failed data release, and bait and switch they've done.

Every single of their paid propagandists should be charged as well.

32 posted on 08/02/2025 9:10:14 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: T.B. Yoits

T.B. Yoits wrote: “That’s some serious Cognitive Dissonance: “They’re safe but the manufacturers must be exempted from liability.””

No, they must be exempted from frivolous lawsuits.
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program exists to compensate those injured by vaccines. So, there is recourse for those injured by vaccines.
Without the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 there would be no vaccines.

But, you knew these things.
You also know that the COVID vaccines had been tested and that vaccine mandates are legal.


33 posted on 08/02/2025 11:35:13 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson