T.B. Yoits wrote: “That’s some serious Cognitive Dissonance: “They’re safe but the manufacturers must be exempted from liability.””
No, they must be exempted from frivolous lawsuits.
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program exists to compensate those injured by vaccines. So, there is recourse for those injured by vaccines.
Without the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 there would be no vaccines.
But, you knew these things.
You also know that the COVID vaccines had been tested and that vaccine mandates are legal.
That's a bald-faced lie. They're exempted from liability lawsuits. No court determines if the suits are frivolous because no court hears the case. The exception of course is fraud because fraud vitiates everything.
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program exists to compensate those injured by vaccines. So, there is recourse for those injured by vaccines.
What absolute spin. Sick. Recourse only after the experiment? Sick. And that "recourse" doesn't allow for punitive damages, nor to stop repeat behavior on the part of the perpetrator.
Without the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 there would be no vaccines.
That's an outright lie. Just stop it. There were vaccines for decades before that unconstitutional Act.
But, you knew these things.
No. I know the opposite.
You also know that the COVID vaccines had been tested and that vaccine mandates are legal.
No, no one except Pfizer and MurdeRNA know how much they've been tested because they refuse to release the data (despite being required to for the Emergency Use Authorization) and they intentionally injected the control group.
And the mandates were illegal, AND YOU KNOW THAT. Here's just one example:
https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/paxton-victorious-lawsuit-against-biden-administrations-vaccine-mandate-federal-contractors