Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: T.B. Yoits

T.B. Yoits wrote: “They DO want their child protected. That’s why they’re not giving them something that has zero liability protection for them but full liability protection for the manufacturer and the government that oversees it.”

Liability protection was enacted to ensure vaccines were available. This protection was necessary because of the unprincipled doctors like Wakefield who, in conjunction with ambulance chasing lawyers, were initiating unfounded lawsuits that threatened to litigate the vaccine makers out of business.


27 posted on 08/02/2025 7:09:06 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke
Liability protection [for manufacturers] was enacted to ensure vaccines were available. This protection was necessary...

The liability exemption wouldn't be necessary if they could make a safe product. Period.

If it's not safe, don't release it.

30 posted on 08/02/2025 8:42:19 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson