1 posted on
07/23/2025 12:05:19 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
2 posted on
07/23/2025 12:05:40 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
3 posted on
07/23/2025 12:08:33 PM PDT by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: BenLurkin
Sue Mother Nature.
Sue God.
That would make as much sense.
To: BenLurkin
The the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US.
5 posted on
07/23/2025 12:14:24 PM PDT by
metmom
(He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus….)
To: BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
7 posted on
07/23/2025 12:16:22 PM PDT by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money)
To: BenLurkin
The United Nations has no sovereign power. Sorry. Read the charter.
8 posted on
07/23/2025 12:27:19 PM PDT by
Ge0ffrey
To: BenLurkin
The UN is about as useful as a bag of half washers.
9 posted on
07/23/2025 12:27:51 PM PDT by
Vaduz
To: BenLurkin
That will be fun to watch. Fortunately the court has no enforcement power, and the US is not a signatory anyway.
To: BenLurkin
12 posted on
07/23/2025 12:39:13 PM PDT by
rrrod
(6)
To: BenLurkin
It has zero jurisdiction here in the US. And should not even be recognized in any way shape or form.
14 posted on
07/23/2025 12:53:13 PM PDT by
Revel
To: BenLurkin
Trump should immediately file suit against China. 18% of the mercury in Oregon is comes from China coal plants.
15 posted on
07/23/2025 1:23:08 PM PDT by
aimhigh
(1 John 3:23 "And THIS is His commandment . . . . ")
To: BenLurkin
China and India are first
16 posted on
07/23/2025 1:25:00 PM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If Hitler were alive today and criticized Trump, would he still be Hitler?)
To: BenLurkin
No one has yet proven that the rise in co2 causes global warming...
In fact, I'd say it balances the need for more food....including meat...for the increase in population.
To: BenLurkin
One is cold the other hot; then they switch climates.
18 posted on
07/23/2025 1:51:09 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
( ~ Am Yisrael Chai ~)
To: BenLurkin
As POTUS I would tell all nations - you can accept the ICJ or you can have relations with us, not both.
If you want something AKIN to the ICJ it would be sovereignty centered, with its members selected as direct representatives of each nations sitting chief executive and it would only hear cases agreed to by 100% of the members, could only issue judgements agreed to by 100% of the members and would have no official or unofficial relationship with any other international body, and certainly not the U.N.
Putting judicial robes on is not an act of magic that magically makes the wearers of those robes morally, legally or politically superior in judgement over any person or nation. It is moral and political suicide, as well as irrational and illogical to pretend otherwise.
19 posted on
07/23/2025 2:28:39 PM PDT by
Wuli
(uire)
To: BenLurkin
This should get them enough attention that Rubio will withdraw their visas and ban them from the US.
20 posted on
07/23/2025 2:51:09 PM PDT by
RetiredTexasVet
(Trump has arrived and it is awesome to have a real President.)
To: BenLurkin
21 posted on
07/23/2025 3:09:58 PM PDT by
antidemoncrat
(In a way ge is right as)
To: BenLurkin
Aside from having no jurisdiction, this court would have to prosecute China as the worst offender.
22 posted on
07/23/2025 3:15:38 PM PDT by
WASCWatch
( WASC)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
