Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top UN court says countries can sue each other over climate change
BBC ^ | 07/23/2025 | Esme Stallard and Georgina Rannard

Posted on 07/23/2025 12:05:19 PM PDT by BenLurkin

The ICJ is considered the world's highest court and it has global jurisdiction. Lawyers have told BBC News that the opinion could be used as early as next week, including in national courts outside of the ICJ.

Campaigners and climate lawyers hope the landmark decision will now pave the way for compensation from countries that have historically burned the most fossil fuels and are therefore the most responsible for global warming.

Many poorer countries had backed the case out of frustration, claiming that developed nations are failing to keep existing promises to tackle the growing problem.

But developed countries, including the UK, argued that existing climate agreements, including the landmark UN Paris deal of 2015, are sufficient and no further legal obligations should be imposed.

On Wednesday the court rejected that argument.

Judge Iwasawa Yuji also said that if countries do not develop the most ambitious possible plans to tackle climate change this would constitute a breach of their promises in the Paris Agreement.

He added that broader international law applies, which means that countries which are not signed up to the Paris Agreement - or want to leave, like the US - are still required to protect the environment, including the climate system.

The court's opinion is advisory, but previous ICJ decisions have been implemented by governments, including when the UK agreed to hand back the Chagos Islands to Mauritius last year.

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...


TOPICS: Weather
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 07/23/2025 12:05:19 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

“Global jurisdiction”


2 posted on 07/23/2025 12:05:40 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

3 posted on 07/23/2025 12:08:33 PM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Sue Mother Nature.
Sue God.
That would make as much sense.
4 posted on 07/23/2025 12:09:11 PM PDT by GaltAdonis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US.


5 posted on 07/23/2025 12:14:24 PM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

A UN court ,LOL


6 posted on 07/23/2025 12:14:28 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Sue China.


7 posted on 07/23/2025 12:16:22 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The United Nations has no sovereign power. Sorry. Read the charter.


8 posted on 07/23/2025 12:27:19 PM PDT by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The UN is about as useful as a bag of half washers.


9 posted on 07/23/2025 12:27:51 PM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Correct,
The first statement is false.
The ICJ does not have jurisdiction in the UnitedStates.


10 posted on 07/23/2025 12:28:17 PM PDT by A strike (unfortunately PDJT is continuing the UKUS v Russia war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

That will be fun to watch. Fortunately the court has no enforcement power, and the US is not a signatory anyway.


11 posted on 07/23/2025 12:33:35 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

This will be fun!


12 posted on 07/23/2025 12:39:13 PM PDT by rrrod (6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The ICJ is considered the world's highest court and it has global jurisdiction


13 posted on 07/23/2025 12:41:16 PM PDT by Dahoser (Liz Cheney needs to work on her soccer skills so she fits in when she transfers to Guantanamo High.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It has zero jurisdiction here in the US. And should not even be recognized in any way shape or form.


14 posted on 07/23/2025 12:53:13 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Trump should immediately file suit against China. 18% of the mercury in Oregon is comes from China coal plants.


15 posted on 07/23/2025 1:23:08 PM PDT by aimhigh (1 John 3:23 "And THIS is His commandment . . . . ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

China and India are first


16 posted on 07/23/2025 1:25:00 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If Hitler were alive today and criticized Trump, would he still be Hitler?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
No one has yet proven that the rise in co2 causes global warming...

In fact, I'd say it balances the need for more food....including meat...for the increase in population.

17 posted on 07/23/2025 1:25:17 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

One is cold the other hot; then they switch climates.


18 posted on 07/23/2025 1:51:09 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Am Yisrael Chai ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

As POTUS I would tell all nations - you can accept the ICJ or you can have relations with us, not both.

If you want something AKIN to the ICJ it would be sovereignty centered, with its members selected as direct representatives of each nations sitting chief executive and it would only hear cases agreed to by 100% of the members, could only issue judgements agreed to by 100% of the members and would have no official or unofficial relationship with any other international body, and certainly not the U.N.

Putting judicial robes on is not an act of magic that magically makes the wearers of those robes morally, legally or politically superior in judgement over any person or nation. It is moral and political suicide, as well as irrational and illogical to pretend otherwise.


19 posted on 07/23/2025 2:28:39 PM PDT by Wuli (uire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

This should get them enough attention that Rubio will withdraw their visas and ban them from the US.


20 posted on 07/23/2025 2:51:09 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Trump has arrived and it is awesome to have a real President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson