Posted on 07/10/2025 10:27:52 AM PDT by Signalman
Famous lawyer and legal expert Alan Dershowitz revealed during an interview on pundit Sean Spicer’s program that he has seen the entire Epstein list and that the document is being suppressed to protect certain individuals.
“Documents are being suppressed to protect individuals. I know the names of the individuals. I know why they’re being suppressed. I know who’s suppressing them. But I’m bound by confidentiality,” he said.
This bombshell comes just 24 hours after both the FBI and the Department of Justice came out and said there is no “client list.”
According to a memo that came out on Wednesday, the DOJ and FBI confirmed, at least according to them, that infamous pedophile sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein did not keep a client list. The memo is allegedly the result of an investigation into the matter, which also concluded there is no credible evidence that Epstein blackmailed powerful people.
It also goes on to reaffirm that Epstein died by suicide in his jail cell back in 2019.
On Monday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked during a press conference to clarify what happened to the client list that Attorney General Pam Bondi said several months ago was sitting on her desk.
Leavitt came to the defense of the FBI and DOJ, saying the Trump administration remains committed to locking up the “bad guys” and had already blown past the former administration in doing just that. She then said they are dedicated to speaking the truth and being transparent, which is why FBI Director Kash Patel and Bondi promised to investigate the files related to Epstein. “The materials that have not been released contain incredibly graphic child pornography, not appropriate for public consumption. Journalist Peter Doocy asked Leavitt about Pam Bondi’s exact statement that Jeffrey Epstein’s client list was sitting on her desk for review, but Leavitt said Bondi was referring to all the documents of the case, not particularly about the client list,” MSN reported.
The public was expecting to see the full Epstein client list, which many believed would be stacked with names of prominent individuals who visited the pedophile’s island and participated in sexual activity with underage girls. Trump’s administration promised it would provide full disclosure of the names of those involved in the sex trafficking operation.
I could care less.
How much less?
If the official position of the US federal government is that there is no such list, then that should render any confidentiality agreement null and void.
<>Btw, before I sign out, the list that I actually want to see is the one that lists payments from Congress “slush/hush fund”. We never got that either.<>
A most excellent point.
Congresswomen have sought, off-and-on for decades, the names of members who benefitted from the $20 million slush fund of taxpayer dollars available to silence the sexual victims of congressmen.
As you imply, the Epstein matter is far bigger. It would also take down (Prince Andrew) pols overseas.
Yeah real fear. Maybe PDJT is blackmailing the rapists. If so, I understand (don’t agree) with his approach.
I didn’t say anything to you in my last post that deserved that response. How sad.
Yes.
It would be interesting to see who’s on both lists.
I was thinking this, in part, as well.
“Both lists” bump.
It not the reporter either.
I have a vague recollection that someone found the connection to pharmacy magnate Applebaum who sold his company to CVS but I can’t remember how it is connected. EG AIR is the owner at that time.
It’s in his memory. I doubt he has a hard copy.
Well, if he got the client info from representing Epstein, he can not divulge it.
1.”Yeah, and still waiting on our nation’s Gold holdings audit. “
I heard that Russia wanted to audit their gold but Putin said he lost it when his boat sank.
Since Epstein is dead, that may not apply, or if it does, someone, the personal representative of his estate, can waive it.
Can you admit that her exact statement did not use the term client list?
Thank you for filling in the blanks. Very interesting.
Indeed
But I’m bound by confidentiality.
Sounds like it’s bogus or he fears them.
I think Virginia’s father worked at Mar a Lago.
It depends on the reason for the lie.
Before the Berlin Wall fell my sister helped smuggle Bibles into East Germany. She was stopped by a guard who asked her about Bibles and he asked her point-blank: “What does your God think of you lying about this?”
In another thread there was discussion about a doctor who gave false covid “vax” passports after his patients, fully informed, said they wanted a saline shot instead of a covid vax. Someone compared it to Christians giving baptism certificates to Jews during the Holocaust. it’s a lie used to prevent murder. Which is worse, the lie or the murder it prevented?
I think these lies are acting, to stall for time until they have all the prosecutions ready at once, so they can send the belligerents who have taken over the US government to the greatly-expanded Gitmo for military tribunals.
They can’t tell us out loud that they are lying, since that would defeat the purpose. All they can say is “Trust me.” And ultimately we will believe that their lies are either for good or for ill, depending on what we think is necessary to accomplish the good. That depends partly on how much we know about the depth of the corruption and the tactics of the enemy. I’ve personally experienced some of the corruption of the enemy, and I have no problem with Trump or anybody else lying to ME if it means they will ultimately be able to bring to justice the people who have violated my family and me, and so many others. I believe they are in solidarity with me and I can the hidden fingers crossed behind their backs.
Not really. Whatever Dershowitz know that is connected to the case where he represented Epstein is covered by Attorney-Client Priviledge.
Yes, Trump is on the list (flight) because he attended some conference with other attendees. Epstein hosted multiple conferences on the island to add to his client list. It was a great cover.
And Biden left no stone unturned when he persecuted / prosecuted Trump, with no resulting mention of Epstein.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.