|
Posted on 06/30/2025 9:00:02 PM PDT by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 07/01/2025 Vol.509, Q Day 2803, USMC79to83 wrote: You are absolutely right! The Fake-News would have portrayed this as a grass-roots movement. Pure, unadulterated, astroturf
WOW! How many protestors does 20 million buy?! Or did that include wet works and shoulder fired missiles?
Epstein and election theft 2020 in the news and someone still has 20 million to splash out on ....what must be major riots, right?
Just a followup to your post about an attempt to buy $20 million dollars worth of rioters...uh...’protestors’ for tomorrow’s July 17th anti-Trump (No Kings) ‘gatherings’.
I wonder if other astroturf organizations took that offer?
I suspect not, I mean, why did this man not take that offer? Are there tear drops in the corners of his eyes? I’m wondering if organizations like his were tied to too many rock throwing hooligans at prior ‘protests’ and, not wanting to implicated in shipping antifa to the capital, some who would like to accept 20 million were sadly afraid to do so.
Dude favors Zuckerberg.... his bro... maybe.
.
Assume 4 hours at $50/hour that would be 100k people. At $100/hr it would be 50k.
Course the organization has to take a % cut as well, and then there are expenses I’m sure, so it would be even less than that.
😂🤣
Prayer reminder for 3:15 Eastern.
Remember to keep our nation and
FRens in your prayers.
Jesus replied, “What is impossible with men
is possible with God.”
Luke 18:27
This is not to say that West Taiwan doesn't have severe infrastructure problems. They do. The poor quality of recent construction means that it will likely begin breaking just at the time the older infrastructure will need replacement due to age. The price tag for that will be truly eye watering.
Meyer, correct me if I'm wrong but power outages don't happen like this. You generally don't just turn off a city without part of a region also going down. You especially don't cut it out without a warning voltage drop. Furthermore, things like the phone system, hospitals, etc have their own backup power supplies. The internet (WWW) IS the phone system. Voice packets get stuffed in gaps in the data stream and no one notices. You can't just turn off connectivity to the web with the nice clean boundaries of a city. It doesn't work that way.
Another thought, a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) might cause large outages but not something with neat edges and a sudden shut off. Furthermore, I haven't seen anything in my space weather feed. Something of this magnitude would be far more dangerous to satellites.
Bottom Line, without some other source, I call BS on this video and say it never happened.
SpyNavy
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
Having read through the bill, it's even WORSE than you would think. It is an amnesty bill for illegal aliens and would absolutely blow the door open on legal migration.
Thread incoming soon. Salazar should resign from Congress, and any Republican cosponsors should think again. https://t.co/L24ebFUvgo— Will Chamberlain (@willchamberlain) July 16, 2025
The closest one by distance is Fernandina Beach, FL, ~8.5 miles, 50 minutes drive. The closest by time is Brunswick, GA, ~22 miles, 35 minutes drive. Heat index is 102+ for tomorrow. Besides, SweetiePalm and I both have hair appointments.
SpyNavy
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
Do it! Use that pistol.
Lucky to $20/hr for 4 hours.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 07/01/2025 Vol.509, Q Day 2803, Farcesensitive wrote: Let’s just go back to this:
“the DOJ is doing so in order to keep the EPA from snaring it for many many years with legal challenges (lawfare).
Bondi is trying to protect the public from the fluoridation which the EPA is protecting.”
This is nonsense, nobody else is going to deal with it at the federal level but the EPA, and this appeal IS snaring it up for years with legal challenges.
The EPA was sued to ban Fluoride as pollutant, the court ordeered them to do so, but Bondi is appealing to keep the EPA from having to do so.
Children’s Health Defense is right and you are making up nonsense:
“Rather than use the court’s decision as an opportunity to finally end water fluoridation (as most of Europe has already done), the EPA will spend its time legally challenging the court’s order,” Connett wrote in a post on X.
The Fluoride Action Network (FAN), one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the EPA, said on X that the appeal was “a very disappointing move by EPA.” “A few months ago, @epaleezeldin went on a public speaking tour with @SecKennedy to address why fluoride needs to come OUT of the water. Now the EPA will appeal to keep fluoride IN drinking water.”
Connett noted that the decision to appeal came from the solicitor general at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), who reports to Pam Bondi and the White House, not by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has vocally opposed water fluoridation, but lacks the authority to end it.
“Only the EPA has this power, and it has decided, for now, to forego its historic opportunity (as provided by the court’s decision) to exercise it,” Connett said.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention publishes recommendations from the U.S. Public Health Service on whether communities should add fluoride to their drinking water and at what levels. However, the EPA sets the maximum levels allowed in water under the Safe Drinking Water Act.
The current maximum allowable levels of fluoride in drinking water are 4.0 milligrams per liter (mg/L), which is many orders of magnitude higher than the currently recommended dosage of 0.7 mg/L.
Even the lower recommended dosage has demonstrated a risk to children’s health in numerous studies, and according to the federal ruling that the EPA plans to challenge.
EPA continues to treat fluoride as a ‘protected pollutant’
In September 2024, U.S. District Judge Edward Chen issued the historic decision in the lawsuit against the EPA, ruling that water fluoridation at current U.S. levels poses an “unreasonable risk” of reduced IQ in children and that the EPA must take regulatory action to address that risk.
At the time of the ruling, more than 200 million Americans were drinking water treated with fluoride at the “optimal” level of 0.7 mg/L.
Chen ruled that a preponderance of scientific evidence showed this level of fluoride exposure may damage human health, particularly that of pregnant mothers and young children.
Environmental and consumer advocacy organizations, including FAN, Moms Against Fluoridation and Food & Water Watch, along with individual parents and children, filed the lawsuit against the EPA in 2017 under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) after the EPA denied their citizens’ petition to reexamine water fluoridation.
During the trial that followed, Chen reviewed existing regulations, regulatory frameworks and current science on fluoride’s risks to children and pregnant women presented through peer-reviewed papers and experts on both sides.
The case dragged on for seven years, after numerous delays by the EPA, and attempts by HHS officials to block the release of the key piece of evidence in the case, a government report on fluoride’s toxicity.
Chen’s 80-page ruling, issued seven months after closing arguments in February 2024, offered a careful and detailed articulation of the EPA’s review process for hazardous chemicals and summarized the extensive scientific data on fluoride’s toxicity.
Chen concluded that the risk to health at current levels of exposure demanded a regulatory response by the agency.
FAN’s executive director, Stuart Cooper, said the group has long sought to end the “unnecessary life-long and life-altering brain impairment in children specifically due to artificial fluoridation schemes” and the many other side effects to people’s liver, kidneys, thyroid and bones.
For nine years, he said, the EPA has been working against them. “From day one of our interactions with them, they’ve treated fluoridation chemicals as a protected pollutant, likely due to the government’s role in promoting their use and guaranteeing their ‘safety’ for over 80 years.”
Cooper added:
“While the science is clear and the lower court’s ruling was very strong and comprehensive, it’s not necessarily a surprise that the appeal has occurred. Our case is precedent-setting. We were the first to sue the EPA under TSCA. I suspect that corporate polluters who have learned how to manage and influence the EPA to their benefit don’t want citizens groups to use TSCA to force the EPA to regulate harmful chemicals.”
Another plaintiff in the lawsuit, Moms Against Fluoridation, told The Defender it was“deeply disappointed” that the EPA plans to appeal the ruling.
“The science is clear, and our lawsuit’s findings are undeniable: fluoridation is a toxic legacy that must end, like asbestos, DDT, and lead,” it said. “The agency’s plan to appeal only underscores their prioritization of industry interests over the well-being of our children and vulnerable populations. Moms Against Fluoridation will not back down — we will continue to fight tirelessly for the health and safety of all Americans.”
The appeal is the legal fight to keep fluoride in the water, and Bondi is the one doing it.
Bondi is not keeping the EPA out of anything, she’s helping the EPA fight to keep fluoride.
What's missing here is EPA-through-2024 versus EPA 2025 (Trump's new head of the EPA).The EPA traditionally resisted and foot-dragged removing fluoride. In 2025, the court didn’t mandate fluoride’s removal but required action to mitigate risks (e.g., warning labels, lowering limits, or a ban). The appeal could be a strategic move to buy time for the new Trump administration’s EPA (under Lee Zeldin, confirmed post-ruling) to reassess fluoride policy, especially given Kennedy’s anti-fluoridation stance. It's possible the EPA’s delays and lack of transparency suggest resistance to change, but if the new EPA boss will not take the reins, Trump can replace him.Lee Zeldin, the EPA Administrator, has indicated that the agency is "prepared to act" regarding the removal of fluoride from drinking water, in response to initiatives led by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Zeldin has pledged to review the science behind fluoride in water and has stated that the EPA is ready to examine new studies that have emerged, though he has not specified concrete actions the agency will take. This suggests that while Zeldin is open to considering changes to fluoride policy, his support for removal is conditional on further review and analysis.
I see the pro-fluoride lobby is banking on EPA 2025 to function like EPA 2024, but I've seen so much winning thus far I can't assume that' Trump's new EPA head will not bring about change. It looks like Bondi believes Zeldin will make the right decision. Zeldin says he will look at the evidence first, just as Trump's appointees said in their confirmation hearings; they couldn't defend making any ruling or decision without first having seen evidence or else they would be derided for partisanship and blind loyalty.
Clandestine
Jul 16, 2025
Trump is very clearly trying to tell us that this Epstein obsession is a TRAP!
Trump is saying we should be focused on things like the autopen and his accomplishments, but the influencer crowd have been psyopped into having tunnel vision on Epstein. It’s all they care about.
No matter what Trump accomplishes now, the morons will say “WHAT ABOUT EPSTEIN!!!!!”. Even after Trump brings an end to the wars in Gaza and Ukraine, they will still only care about Epstein.
Trump is trying to tell us that the enemy wants us distracted on Epstein, because then there is less coverage on Trump stopping wars around the globe, fixing the economy, securing the border, deporting criminals, purging government agencies, etc.
Instead, all the coverage is nonsense claiming Trump and his administration are engaged in a coverup, that Trump is protecting elite pedos, that Bondi/Kash/Bongino should be fired, and Trump should be impeached. This is exactly what the enemy wants.
It’s a massive smear campaign and psychological operation, which all stems from anonymous leaks by known nefarious Deep State asset, Axios, combined with the gullible clickbait influencers, and social media manipulation. The enemy is fighting back.
I’ve been trying to tell you all exactly this the entire time. This Epstein hysteria is being fueled by nefarious entities, trying to hurt Trump, and as Trump says himself, many of you have “bought into this bullsh**, hook, line, and sinker”.
Trump is not saying the Epstein operation is a hoax, he is saying the current unhinged OBSESSION with Epstein is the hoax, and it’s designed to distract you, derail Trump’s support, and sow doubt within our ranks.
And I tip my hat to the enemy, because it’s working. So many took the cheese. So many have allowed their emotions to be manipulated.
I think he keeps churning the waters himself to keep it in the news and distract from something else that is going on...what that something else is I have no idea.
Otherwise He would have made his comment last week and then just let it go an not comment on it anymore or if asked about it refer to his prior statement.
Am I the only one to spot something that a Judas Goat would plant on the Left? Perhaps something that gets out of hand and leads to the Storm?
Magnificent misdirection/overton window shift
Wanting arrests for elite pedos was reduced to “a client list”
A client list was reduced to deepstate subterfuge
Now, anyone who believes it is stupid and shouldn’t support Twitty cause he don’t want it
#masterfulConsciousnessCloudManipulation #overtonWindowShifts #howDoesItWork #greatDeception #greaterDeceptionThanNormal
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
