A seeker's quest across 4000 miles of India in search of answers about where Jesus was during the "Hidden Years" from ages 12 to 30.Jesus In India
Free with ads | TV-G | 1:37:14
YouTube Movies & TV | 188M subscribers
A seeker's quest across 4000 miles of India in search of answers about where Jesus was during the "Hidden Years" from ages 12 to 30.Jesus In India
Free with ads | TV-G | 1:37:14
YouTube Movies & TV | 188M subscribers
No one is a descendant of Jesus! There may well be descendants of Jesus’ brothers or sisters (Joseph’s children), however.
We all should be followers of Jesus!
This all looks very interesting. Thanks for posting.
It tries very hard to prove a heresy that Jesus has direct descendents which would mean Jesus fathered Children. It was produced 8 years ago. Fraud stay away.
Uh, upon my reading of the Bible, Jesus didn’t have any descendants.
It tries very hard to prove a heresy that Jesus has direct descendents which would mean Jesus fathered Children. It was produced 8 years ago. Fraud stay away.
If they could find and isolate His Y chromosome, that would be very interesting.
And just how can they tell they have John the Baptist’s bones? Ridiculous!
Jesus was never married. The idea that he has descendants probably comes from the book and movie The Da Vinci Code, which also claims Jesus was not the Son of God and Christianity is a fraud.
Jesus certainly had brothers and sisters by way of Mary and Joseph. Unfortunately no one knows who or where they went. Maybe they are around somewhere
Look, this is just my immediate reaction: I just don’t trust squeaky-voiced men with tattoos; Leviticus 19:28 notwithstanding.
they did this with Luke. I am supposedly in his descendant group.
“Luke the Evangelist may have also belonged to H2.
H2 common ancestor
12,000 years ago
Luke the Evangelist
St. Luke in the Cologne Cathedral, Germany.
Historical evidence suggests that Luke the Evangelist, author of the Gospel according to Luke and the Acts of the Apostles, was born in the city of Antioch in ancient Syria in the first century C.E. He died and was said to be buried in Thebes, Greece, before his tomb was later transferred to Constantinople and then finally came to rest in Padua, Italy.
In 2001, a team of researchers hoped to use DNA evidence to help verify that the relic in Padua was likely to be Luke the Evangelist, and had not been replaced with the remains of another man in Thebes or Constantinople. They did so by testing his mitochondrial DNA, which they found to belong to haplogroup H2a2b. They also confirmed that it was unlikely that the body had been exchanged for another in Greece, though they could not rule out that possibility in Constantinople.”
It’s a fascinating concept but almost certainly a waste of time. There’s no basis for imagining the early Christians worshipped relics and toted them around for safekeeping - everything points in the opposite direction. Their faith and their focus was in their Lord and Savior, not chunks of wood or pieces of linen. So the myriad of thousands of “relics” that started floating around centuries later are most certainly 100.000% all fakes by cults that weakened or abandoned faith in a savior and replaced it with an obsession over idols of wood and stone and clothe, etc.
everything they test will come back with different DNA, because it is all fake, every bit of it.
Handle with care. Finding a “descendent” or relative of Jesus through DNA could play havoc upon believers whose faith is wavering. An opening for one of those referenced in Matthew 24:5...”For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.”
Several DNA studies on Jewish Davidic descent, and other more traditional family descent studies. Here’s one:
and
https://momentmag.com/king-davids-genes-2/
So... maybe unearth the progeny of the half-siblings...
A longshot, but interesting in concept, anyway.
