Posted on 04/09/2025 6:21:36 AM PDT by Red Badger
The triumphal arch holds a very important place in the annals of Western architecture and urbanism. In Roman times it played a lofty honorific role, even though most Roman arches commemorated civic achievements and personages rather than military victories. The freestanding monumental arch was a syncretic creation, structurally derived from Etruscan gateways and decoratively enriched with Hellenistic architectural and sculptural forms. Its distinctive presence, which accommodated an astonishing variety in massing and detail, enriched towns and cities across the Roman empire, from Spain to Syria.
The monumental arch should be regarded as a universal entity—eminently appropriate, one would think, to a universal nation like these United States. The late, great historian of imperial Roman architecture, William L. MacDonald, noted how the arch corresponds to the classical concept of human proportions as delineated in Leonardo da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man, in which a male figure is inscribed within an overlapping circle and square. The impost or “springing” of the opening within the arch corresponds, MacDonald noted, to the Vitruvian Man’s arms extended directly outward, while the curvilinear opening itself corresponds to his arms sweeping upward. The arch’s geometry thus addresses us as embodied beings. You can’t get more universal than that.
Which brings us to the need for a monumental arch commemorating the semiquincentennial anniversary of the Declaration of Independence—an event of universal significance—in our nation’s capital. President Trump has declared his intention to re-establish the primacy of the classical tradition in Washington’s public architecture. A temporary Independence Arch would be the ideal place to start.
There is not enough time to erect a permanent one by July 4, 2026, but the temporary arch should be considered a forerunner—a trial run, if you like—for a permanent replacement. There is a significant, if largely forgotten, tradition of temporary arches in this country. It was most directly inherited from Europe, but its ancient origin was always borne in mind, not least in the early years of the republic.
When, late in 1783, the Pennsylvania General Assembly commissioned the prominent artist Charles Willson Peale to create a temporary arch in Philadelphia celebrating the Revolutionary War’s victorious conclusion, it called for a monument “exactly in the stile [sic] of the triumphal arches among the Romans.”
In his magisterial Architecture of the Roman Empire: An Urban Appraisal (1986), MacDonald observed that the arch is “a mechanism of transit and transition. It sharply marks a division between two areas or places without sealing off either…. The archway proper…suggests the presence beyond of a place different from that before it.” Of course, this principle applies to time as well as space where the monumental commemoration of American independence is concerned.
Where to put the arch? The most important monumental axis in the United States extends westward from the Capitol to the National Mall, Washington Monument, and Lincoln Memorial before deflecting to the southwest across Arlington Memorial Bridge and down Memorial Avenue to Arlington National Cemetery’s granite Hemicycle. Roadways leading into the cemetery branch off to right and left in front of the Hemicycle.
The proposed arch site, looking toward the Lincoln Memorial from Memorial Avenue. Credit: Catesby Leigh
Perspective sketch of a triumphal arch on the circle between Arlington Memorial Bridge and Memorial Avenue by Nicolas Charbonneau of Harrison Design.
There is a conspicuous dead space that marks a transition in this grand axis. Between the bridge and Memorial Avenue lies a patch of turf about a hundred yards in diameter, enclosed by a traffic circle. This turfed expanse is surrounded by four eagle-crowned pylons 43 feet tall, two at the southwestern end of the bridge and the other two at the entrance to Memorial Avenue. As has long been recognized, this circular expanse needs an arch.
An Independence Arch need not be huge. The pairs of pylons are spaced 85 feet from one another across the bridge and across the avenue. Gibson Worsham, a veteran architect at the Richmond, Virginia, firm of Glavé & Holmes, with whom I recently visited the site, says an arch 60 feet in height and width and 30 feet in depth might achieve the necessary monumental scale.
A handsome Victory Arch in Newport News, Virginia’s historic downtown, originally erected in 1919 of wood and stucco and replicated in stone decades later, is 50 feet in height and width. Worsham estimates that a temporary arch, this one steel-framed, could be erected at the rotary circle for $15 million. It would stand for a few years at least, or possibly a few decades.
The Victory Arch, a beloved landmark in Newport News, Virginia’s historic downtown. Built as a temporary arch in 1919, rebuilt in stone in 1962. The Eternal Flame in front is a later addition to the site. Credit: Carol M. Highsmith, Library of Congress Prints and Photographs
The big challenge is time. If the arch is to be completed by the semiquincentennial, a presidential executive order mandating its construction at the circle, which is located on federal land, needs to be issued very soon. The order might name a top-tier classical architect to preside over the selection of a design team including an architect, sculptor, and builder by this coming July 4. The architect should consult with other professionals with relevant experience, but the final choice of a team should be up to him or her. The design team would have a year to design, build, and decorate the temporary arch, which might or might not bear a close resemblance to a permanent Independence Arch. The sculptural treatment of a permanent arch would presumably be more elaborate, perhaps featuring an emperor-like Liberty figure driving a four-horsed chariot, or quadriga, at its summit.
Washington is the only major Western capital without a monumental arch. There were more than 50 in ancient Rome and hundreds more throughout its empire. In addition to the Independence Arch, a Constitution Arch should be erected at an important axial transition point on the other side of town to celebrate the semiquincentennial of the Constitution’s ratification in 1789. The site is Barney Circle, located about a mile and a half southeast of the Capitol on Pennsylvania Avenue, where the avenue meets the Anacostia River and the John Philip Sousa Bridge. This presently tangled, amorphous site—its name notwithstanding—is an important traffic node next door to Congressional Cemetery, a National Historic Landmark established in 1807, as well as a riverwalk trail along the Anacostia.
Decades ago, the National Monuments Foundation, headed by Rodney Mims Cook, Jr., proposed a quadrifrontal arch for the site to mark the new millennium. The plan calls for curved porticos framing the arch and surrounding realigned roadway, and an imposing new cemetery entrance replacing unsightly chain-link fencing. It also includes handsome, fountain-crowned stone bastions on each side of the avenue where it meets the bridge, one of them incorporating elegant balustraded stairways down to the river trail.
Rendering of the National Monuments Foundation’s proposed Millennium Gate at Barney Circle in southeast Washington, D.C. (2000). Credit: National Monuments Foundation
Barney Circle is city-owned turf. The National Monuments Foundation’s plan for the site, which was shelved amidst the post-9/11 uproar, would enhance a monumentally underserved portion of the most important avenue in Pierre Charles L’Enfant’s great plan of 1791, while attracting amenities, pedestrians, hikers, and bicyclists—tourists and locals alike—to the riverside.
A Barney Circle arch would make an excellent monument to the Constitution. Let’s hope D.C. officials and culturally attuned congressmen will work together to realize the Foundation’s exemplary vision for an improved public realm. And let’s hope President Trump mandates an Independence Arch that shows them the way.
Catesby Leigh writes about public art and architecture and lives in Washington, D.C.
Over everything....................
No, let’s not. If we do build an arch, chances are that it will be weird, woke and ugly, like most of what now passes for “art.”
While I agree in principle that something classicly grand and architecturally significant to commemorate America’s 250th anniversary needs to be erected, there are a few issues to be worked out. Foremost among them is the fact that if President Trump orders and completes it, the design will have to include a guard post and plans to have the site protected 24/7/365 by armed guards. Otherwise the BLM/ANTIFA/pink pussy hat legions of domestic terrorists will constantly desecrate the structure with their ugly obscene graffiti and odious physical presence.
This is why we can’t have nice things.
The planned site is the entrance to Arlington National Cemetery...................
Absolutely not. And I was sad to see hardly a mention of yesterday’s anniversary of the Battle of Lexington. Every day this year & next is a good opportunity to discuss the American Revolution & our history.
We don’t need arches, we need to educate our young people on what this country is all about.
Already got an arch.
Its in St Louis.
+1
it needs to be a bigger, more beautiful arch than anything else in the world
But far enough away to invite vandalism. On site armed guards will absolutely be required.
Forget the arch.
Have the mother of all parades.
DC’s fine. It needs the reminder.
Include military and re-enactors from our nation’s history.
Stuff from every state and territory.
Marching bands. And Sousa.
And last, but not least, fife and drum corps.
Lots of fife and drums.
I’ve seen the Memorial Arch in Newport News, probably 40 years ago.
It’s wedged in between the shipyard and the bulk coal facility. I wouldn’t venture down there at night for any reason. .
Mr. President, if I may make a suggestion...
Next year visit places like Sturbridge, MA; Mystic CT, Williamsburg VA, Fort Ticonderoga, NY, St Augustine, FL; Gettysburg, PA; The Alamo; Golden Spike National Historic Park in Utah; Wright Brothers National Memorial, NC.
You get the idea...
Make our history great again.
God bless.
And Plimouth, MA...
Jeez, can’t forget Plimouth...
Nice idea but a waste of money. The symbolism of an arch is long lost on our ill educated younger generation. What we need is a year of local celebrations. Let the jubilee year start with President Trump starting the fireworks at Mt. Rushmore in America’s heartland.
One monument that is needed in Washington is one honoring Native Americans who bravely fought in America’s wars including the code talkers and Medal of Honor winners. I am also in favor of reviving the tradition of naming Navy warships after great Native American chiefs e.g., USS Tecumseh which fought at the Battle of Mobile Bay in the Civil War. In the Star Trek saga theUSS Crazy Horse was an Excelsior class Federation starship operated by Starfleet in the late 24 th century. Maybe we not wait another three centuries.
Wichita
Let’s spend money on infrastructure repairs and upgrades, rather than decorative crap. If you really want an arch, solicit donations to fund it.
Keep dividing
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.