That’s not quite how they see it. Here is a recent post by Bongino. https://x.com/FBIDDBongino/status/1906335734836977908
Sounds like is understands exactly your view and what is actually going on.
What is not being done at the FBI?
what they say publicly, what they believe, and how they are operating privately, may all be different things
https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1906693978088493106 (quote tweeting Bongino — https://x.com/FBIDDBongino/status/1906335734836977908)
Read this carefully.
“Transparency” appears to mean the dirty operatives inside and outside the FBI hid—and are still hiding—records and info we want. People demanding outcomes right now truly have no grasp of the deep corruption throughout this 37,000-employee agency with 56 field offices and layers of entrenched, uncooperative bureaucracy. (Keep in mind, every field office was involved in the investigations, raids, and arrests of J6ers.)
Did you really think Chris Wray was just going to leave J6-related records including the pipe bomber on his desk for the next director to have? Or all the materials on the criminal investigations into the Pres Trump and his team? Or the surveillance of conservatives including members of Congress? Or comms between DOJ/FBI and Biden White House? Or Jack Smith’s records?
Even if Wray had placed all the files in a nice stack on Kash’s desk, it takes time to investigate, find new evidence, interview witnesses, bring the case before a grand jury (in Washington, presumably), and obtain an indictment.
My guess is Kash and Dan in addition to the new leadership at DOJ are absolutely blown away by the depth of corruption, criminality, and depravity at the FBI. It is probably nearly impossible to process and even more difficult figuring out where to start.
Exposing what happened at the FBI for more than a decade and holding those responsible will take time—and caution. The American people are not prepared to learn what the country’s top law enforcement agency has been up to in targeting Trump and MAGA—and more importantly, what it was not doing to keep us safe.
I was honored to be at Dan’s 50th birthday party in December. He is beyond blessed with a loving family, loyal friends, thriving business, and a comfortable lifestyle—he did not sacrifice that for now to push papers around or hide the ball. That’s not his style whatsoever.
Be patient and trust those in charge. If in a year from now, we still don’t have some disclosures, you can bitch. Otherwise, appreciate and support the nearly insurmountable task before them.
The corrupt agents discredit the other 5%.
Sundance “knows” everything that is happening in the FBI just ask him. Beware of Surrender Monkeys they never stop digging.
“Hence the ‘95% honorable’ quote by Patel”
If he actually believes that, we’re so screwed. I wonder if Bongino feels the same. I doubt it.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled This is why NOTHING is being accomplished at the FBI, hardspunned wrote: For crying out loud, “95% honorable”! Both those guys have done too many Boom Boom Hannity shows. I don't believe they actually trust that 95% are honorable. They don't want to panic the public by telling them the FBI is malevolent and lodged in the Capitol, trying to take down the country, starting with the patriots Trump put in positions throughout the government.
Civic stability is key to rooting out the toxins infecting our nation - not government collapse. The FBI/CIA and other portions of fallen INTEL are threats to the 'good guys' trying to restore the rule of law; they are basically holding our country hostage. Literally, the lives of patriots in government are in danger; they are essentially working alongside those who want them dead. They need our support and prayers.
Musk, Trump, Bondi and those in INTEL are in danger. The Deep State shot Trump in the head; it's not like he forgot what our priorities are. Trump knows what's going on; he didn't put puppy-eyed ingenues in positions where they need to fight for freedom around the world. Prayers up!
As usual, Mark Bradman pretends to be smarter than everyone else, evidently as a result of his years as a produce manager at Publix.
I can be patient and wait as long as I understand the folks in charge fully appreciate the degree of corruption and are fully engaged in getting results. These tasks are very hard, that takes time. However I benefit from an occasional statement affirming that they indeed have found the rampant corruption and are fully, actively engaged in rooting it out. And, it would be nice to set my expectations, it will take about 6 months before the evidence can be traced to source, and the first arrests. More, quicker after that. Just tell me something vs nothing.
They’re a bunch of careerists that will do whatever to get that pension.
There seems to be nothing going on at the CIA also. Look back at the attacks on America that have occurred over the past 25 years. Even a total invasion by foreign nationals from all over the planet. The CIA should have seen this coming and did something to stop it. We even had a known communist running the joint.
The article makes a flawed assumption: that solving internal corruption requires a public admission of it and a detailed, visible plan.
But real institutional reform—especially in law enforcement—is often silent by necessity. Broadcasting your moves only tips off those you’re trying to root out. Silence can be strategic, not a sign of failure.
It also underestimates Patel and Bongino by implying they don’t grasp the scope of FBI corruption. Patel himself was targeted by a politicized FBI investigation—he’s no stranger to the problem. His “95% honorable” line may not reflect denial, but strategy: boosting morale among good agents while quietly isolating the bad.
Reforming an institution this entrenched can’t happen overnight or in the open. Treasury’s approach under Bessent may be effective, but that doesn’t make Patel’s efforts any less serious. Judging a covert cleanup operation by its lack of visibility misses the point entirely.
The man who wrote the memo about going after the Catholics is still in the FBI.
For crying out loud, “95% honorable”!
It doesn’t mean they don’t go after the problems.
It is like Trump saying positive things about his opponents.,
Well at least they’re not trying to claim they’re 99.9% honorable like Wallbanger always does.
/sarc
I generally like Sundance, but this is really illogical. The argument is that Patel and Bongino are good mid-level managers but don’t have the experience of executive suite management that Trump and Musk, and Scott Bessent ,do. So, if Trump appointed Patel and Bongino to positions illustrating the Peter principle so well, particularly in an agency at the very top of the deep state totem, what does it say about executive level decision making?
6 MINUTE VIDEO EXPLAINS HOW TO CAPTURE A NATION!
WATCH & SHARE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0RNakRq24
6 MINUTE VIDEO EXPLAINS HOW TO CAPTURE A NATION!
WATCH & SHARE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0RNakRq24
Fire them all, shut it down, and start from scratch.