Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/28/2025 5:09:47 AM PST by 7thson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 7thson

Retired is to be a civilian again................


2 posted on 02/28/2025 5:14:08 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

My view - they are subject to be recalled back to duty and court-martialed. Once in the service, you are never completely free.


3 posted on 02/28/2025 5:14:14 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

can’t all retired military personnel be recalled to active duty at anytime?


4 posted on 02/28/2025 5:14:21 AM PST by Qwapisking ("The left will rue the day they cheated Trump out of the 2020 election forever" L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

I thought General officers were never really retired and subject to recall at all times?


9 posted on 02/28/2025 5:26:58 AM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

Bullsh!t. Every retired military person is still subject to the UCMJ in a limited sense; they are on inactive reserve for quite a long time. In that capacity, they can be recalled to active duty and fully prosecuted under the UCMJ.


11 posted on 02/28/2025 5:31:19 AM PST by Spacetrucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson
Red Badger; iontheball; Qwapisking; normbal; Pontiac; usurper; GingisK;

Retirees do not need to be called back to Active Duty to face charges under the UCMJ:

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10945

The Supreme Court has not yet specifically ruled on the military status of retired servicemembers, though it has approvingly noted that they remain part of the Armed Forces and subject to the UCMJ. Federal appellate courts (e.g., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces [CAAF]), however, have consistently held that military retirees possess a military status that makes them subject to military law. In finding such status, courts have highlighted several connections between retired servicemembers and the military: they can be recalled to active duty and, accordingly, serve as a potential source of supplementary personnel; they are entitled to receive special pay and other benefits from the military, which are viewed, at least in part, as retainer conferrals; and they have the right to wear their uniforms and be referred to according to their rank (in certain circumstances).

The U.S. Court of Military Appeals (now the CAAF) articulated a widely adopted position in 1958 in United States v. Hooper: [Those] on the retired list are not mere pensioners in any sense of the word. They form a vital segment of our national defense for their experience and mature judgment are relied upon heavily in times of emergency. The salaries they receive are not solely recompense for past services, but a means devised by Congress to assure their availability and preparedness in future contingencies. This preparedness depends as much upon their continued responsiveness to discipline as upon their continued state of physical health. Certainly, one who is authorized to wear the uniform of his country, to use the title of his grade, who is looked upon as a model of the military way of life, and who receives a salary to assure his availability, is a part of the land or naval forces.

Non-retirees cannot be called back to Active Duty to face charges under the UCMJ unless they're in the Selective Reserve or Individual Ready Reserve. (They would face charges in local, state, or Federal courts). One's initial service commitment is eight years which can be a combination of Active Duty, Selective Reserve, or Individual Ready Reserve. For example, those who do one tour ("four and out"), if they don't join the Selective Reserve, they're placed in the Individual Ready Reserve for four years.

15 posted on 02/28/2025 5:40:21 AM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson; Red Badger
Retired military members can be brought back onto active duty to face charges under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) in extraordinary circumstances. According to Department of the Army policy, retired soldiers subject to the UCMJ will not be tried for offenses by courts-martial unless such extraordinary circumstances are present. This means that if necessary to facilitate court-martial action, retired soldiers may be ordered back onto active duty.

The UCMJ applies to certain retirees, particularly those who have served more than 20 years but less than 30 and receive retirement pay, as they can be recalled to active duty without their consent in times of war or national emergency. However, retirees who have served 30 years or more are transferred to the Regular Retired List and are no longer subject to the UCMJ.

There are ongoing legal challenges to the rules that allow certain retirees to be court-martialed, which could have significant implications for military veterans.

References Follow:

Anyone ever seen a retiree pulled back on AD to face UCMJ for something they did while Retired? Or is this just another unenforceable part of a reg?

From AR 27-10, Military Justice:

a) Retired Soldiers should not engage in personal or professional activities that are incompatible with the standards of conduct expected of active duty personnel.

b) Retired members of a regular component of the Armed Forces who are entitled to pay are subject to the provisions of the UCMJ. Retired Soldiers are subject to the UCMJ and may be tried by court-martial for violations of the UCMJ that occurred while they were on active duty or while in a retired status.

Department of the Army policy provides that Retired Soldiers subject to the UCMJ will not be tried for any offense by any courts-martial unless extraordinary circumstances are present. If necessary to facilitate courts martial action, Retired Soldiers may be ordered to active duty.

Do Retired Military Still Fall Under UCMJ?

17 posted on 02/28/2025 5:41:23 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

All retired officers can be recalled to duty. It happened to Rickover twice. ‘74 and ‘77.

Retired officers receiving pay are still subject to the UCMJ.


18 posted on 02/28/2025 5:53:30 AM PST by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

We have some freepers with more recent military legal experience than mine. But there probably still are 3 categories of military retirees, enlisted, reserve officers, regular officers.

Enlisted retirees as far as I know can be voluntarily recalled, but only if they agree. They are not subject to the UCMJ while retired.

Then there are reserve officers and regular officers. When retired, reserve officers are generally not subject to recall and are not subject to the UCMJ.

Then there are regular officers. Most active duty Air Force officers (I can’t speak for other services) in the rank of major or above are regular officers. They are commissioned for life, and in retirement are just moved from the active duty list to the retired list. They can be recalled to active duty any time.

They are also technically still subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, at least in certain circumstances. For example, committing a crime on a military base. How far this goes has not been tested in court, to my knowledge.

Considering the subject, I don’t think I’d better comment any further. ;-)


19 posted on 02/28/2025 5:54:45 AM PST by Cincinnatus.45-70 (What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson
And if is not true, that they can be brought up on UCMJ charges, than is that true for all retired personnel?

To a point. The winner writes history. In 2020, I saw the democrat party, led by Al gore and Joe Liberman, attempt to disenfranchise military voters in Florida, and steal the election. That was when I doffed my uniform and marched against the coup. Had Gore prevailed, my story would have been different.

20 posted on 02/28/2025 5:58:46 AM PST by ETCM (“There is no security, no safety, in the appeasement of evil.” — Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

I doubt there could be any prosecution for anything done after retirement but they could be brought back and charged for activity before they were retired. Once brought back they would be subject to the full code.


30 posted on 02/28/2025 6:45:29 AM PST by gunnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson
This works too...

Article 134—General article

a. Text of statute.
Though not specifically mentioned in this chapter, all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, and crimes and offenses not capital, of which persons subject to this chapter may be guilty, shall be taken cognizance of by a general, special, or summary court-martial, according to the nature and degree of the offense, and shall be punished at the discretion of that court.
31 posted on 02/28/2025 6:46:42 AM PST by HombreSecreto (The life of a repo man is always intense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

I’m free of the UCMJ now. There is a period of time when all retirees are a component of the Non-Active Reserves though.


36 posted on 02/28/2025 8:45:20 AM PST by Mathews (I have faith Malachi is right!!! Any day now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

UCMJ applies to Commissioned Officers even after retirement.


39 posted on 02/28/2025 9:41:07 AM PST by Feckless (The US Gubbmint / This Tagline CENSORED by FR \ IrOnic, ain't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

IIRC, there is the Ready Reserve, which is a seven year call back period after leaving the military.


40 posted on 02/28/2025 10:58:10 AM PST by Grey182 (Trump won, Benedict XVI never resigned & Jeffery Epstein didn't kill himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 7thson

From the UCMJ listing those who are subject to the UCMJ, Article 2, (a)(3)(iii)(4):
Retired members of a regular component of the armed forces who are entitled to pay.


42 posted on 03/01/2025 6:59:25 AM PST by ops33 (SMSgt, USAF, Retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson