Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Broad is UCMJ Article 88

Posted on 02/28/2025 5:09:47 AM PST by 7thson

I posted yesterday that those that signed the letter demanding Congress investigate the firing of the CJCS, and their insubordinate remarks should be charge with Article 88 of the UCMJ and court-martialed. I received one response that stated that since they are retired, the UCMJ does not apply to them.

Is that true?

And if is not true, that they can be brought up on UCMJ charges, than is that true for all retired personnel?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: defense; insubordinate; mathis; ucmj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last
To: Grey182

I’m way past all of that.


41 posted on 02/28/2025 11:30:02 AM PST by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

From the UCMJ listing those who are subject to the UCMJ, Article 2, (a)(3)(iii)(4):
Retired members of a regular component of the armed forces who are entitled to pay.


42 posted on 03/01/2025 6:59:25 AM PST by ops33 (SMSgt, USAF, Retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson