Three Novel Ways to Bring Those Receiving Biden’s Preemptive Pardons to Justice

Use some of the same methods the Biden DOJ used against Trump and members of his administration.

They collectively came to power in 2021 under dubious electoral circumstances in 2020 and then proceeded to wield that power with all of the care and nuance of napalm. Laws and the Constitution be damned, they thought they were untouchable. And they worked hard to make the people pay dearly for resistance to their authority. Witness the January 6 Select Committee.

Comprised of a comically corrupt and deceitful collection of rank partisans from both parties, the J6 Committee had two distinct goals: To prosecute American citizens participating in the J6 protests without any due process, many of whom were thrown in prison for merely being in Washington D.C. on January 6, 2021, and to hang the entirety of the Capitol riot on that day around the neck of outgoing-president Donald Trump.

Evidence was suppressed or destroyed. Witnesses were coached or threatened. Transcribed interviews held under oath were hidden. To have called this a kangaroo court is nowhere near harsh enough to explain the gross serial violations of legal and Constitutional laws by these Congressional conspirators. And they have now been rewarded for their lawlessness with preemptive presidential pardons.

The blatant use of these pardons to shield criminality is just another example of how Democrats have been deploying extra-legal ways to punish their enemies. Hmmm…maybe we should look at how we can follow their lead against these “untouchables” who think they got away with behaviors that would have put anyone else in prison.

Get Liz Cheney, Bennie Thompson, Adam Kinzinger, and Jamie Raskin (and other J6 Committee Members): The Cassidy Hutchinson Path

On Monday, hours before ex-President Joe Biden (how we love saying that term ex-President Biden) handed the White House keys to Donald Trump, the entire J6 Committee was granted immunity through preemptive pardons. One figure who was not pardoned was Cassidy Hutchinson, a one-time Trump aide, who testified before the J6 Committee after discussing the case with J6 Committee Vice-Chair Liz Cheney without the presence of her lawyer. Cheney, who suborned false testimony from Hutchinson, put Cassidy in the unenviable position of possibly being the only person participating in the J6 show trial who could be convicted of perjury and could face years in federal prison.

The sight of proven criminality by never-Trumper Republican Liz Cheney being exonerated by a Democrat in the White House is ironic. That Cheney led a mid-level aide into a perjury trap, who could be convicted and go to prison, would demonstrate a miscarriage of justice that most Americans would not tolerate. Public opinion can only be ignored for so long, as Democrats found out on November 5, 2024.

Let’s hope that Hutchinson will be given the opportunity to recant her testimony and implicate Cheney and the rest of the J6 Committee even though inoculated with the broad grant of immunity, none will likely ever see the inside of a prison cell.

Sue and prosecute Liz Cheney through Wyoming Attorney General Bridget Hill for not representing the will of her constituents in being the point person on the J6 Committee in prosecuting Trump. Could Cheney and the other J6 Committee members be held accountable for election interference? While Cheney is shielded by her presidential pardon, and having been a sitting member of Congress at the time, she might not enjoy these legal protections in state proceedings. At least that’s what Democrats claimed in the Georgia election interference case as well as their coordinated efforts to remove Trump from various state ballots prior to the Republican National Convention last Summer.

The same holds true for Shifty Adam Schiff. While the California AG would not deploy his office against Schiff, what would stop Attorneys General in other states from deploying this well-used Soros/Democrat tactic? The Democrats have let this genie out of the bottle with the state-focused Fani Willis method. Can other states’ Attorneys General start proceedings against Schiff not burdened by the legal albatross of having slept with their prosecutors in a quid pro quo exchange of money for lavish trips? Make the case that the actions of Schiff et. al. constitute election interference, especially with their attempts to remove Trump from various state ballots.

While we might rail against such practices, had it not been for the corruption in the Fani Willis election interference prosecution, the Georgia case might have gone forward prior to the 2024 election. We need to know the origins of this case (a Soros-backed group perhaps). Had it gone forward in the summer and fall of 2024, right now we might have a Kamala Harris presidency.

Joe Biden and His Crimes Before the Start of His Presidency: The Merrick Garland Path

Of all three methods, this might seem to be the most vindictive and reeks of retribution, but after what Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland did for four years, who cares? The Democrats set the precedent, now turn it around and weaponize it against Biden and especially Garland. Using the Hur investigation as the foundation to reinstate the charges that as vice president, when he lacked SCOTUS-decided presidential immunity, Biden knowingly and willfully took personal documents he was not entitled to then stored them in his Delaware garage next to his prized Corvette, committed exactly the same acts that gave Garland the pretext to raid Mar-A-Lago and rifle through the current First Lady’s underwear drawer.

Garland has actually boasted that he authorized the raid. Does this make him legally culpable? Through this action did Garland, at the time the nation’s top law enforcement officer, violate the constitutional rights of Trump and his documents case associated defendants? It’s a novel legal theory, but in the aftermath of the New York Alvin Bragg prosecution of Trump, it’s certainly worth exploring.

There is no reason why the Trump administration can’t tie up Garland with endless legal bills and use exactly the same lawfare that he deployed against Trump for almost four years. Start the process through James Comer’s Oversight Committee with a re-energized DOJ led by new Attorney General Pam Bondi. To our knowledge, unlike Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas, Garland did not receive the same “get out of jail free” card of presidential immunity. Could this oversight, pun intended, be the key to unlocking the massive corruption of Garland and the Biden administration?

With Democrats so fond of using Hitler references in describing Trump, we can paraphrase what he said in 1941 before invading the Soviet Union, “You only have to kick in the door and the whole (stinking) structure will come crashing down.” What would the poetic justice be if this strategy was deployed against these vile and evil Democrats and Republican turncoats like Cheney and Kinzinger? Banish them from polite society and let them rot alongside the other irrelevant media corpses that are walking the halls of collapsing MSNBC and CNN.

It’s time for the whole truth to come out.

Compelling those pardoned to testify opens them up to the potential for the new unpardoned crime of perjury if they are not truthful. This is where t can get interesting. The pardoned individuals did not act alone. Lots of staff members and others that are complicit. Those pardoned are not likely to risk perjury to protect some staffer or witness or other conspirator.

The wheels will come off the bus as folks join the “Let’s Make a Deal” line. The only way we can make progress is scare the living carp out of people so they won’t risk their careers and freedom to perpetuate their political dogma by illegal and deceitful means.

What’s IRONIC is that if Garland has prosecuted these clowns at the top and then they were pardoned, their underlings probably would have gotten off, especially if they sang.

But Garland didn’t prosecute them and now their exposed BIG TIME to the wrath of Cash Patel (hopefully).

This article is sophomoric, tit-for-tat revenge fantasy. Congress or the DOJ needs to act by refining the terms of what may be pardoned going forward, bringing suit to the SCOTUS if possible. There has never before been a “pre-emptive” presidential pardon. Go after some of the low-hanging fruit on that one, like the J6 Committee loudmouth Kinzinger.

While that is the right thing to do it has been determined that the presidency is official when a perceived winner takes the Oath of Office.

This is because of the Republicans failing to challenge the ineligible Kenyan for fear of accusations of racism. Too much time, water under the bridge and laws enacted to go retroactive and declare everything magic negro signed to be null and void.

But don’t mind me - I think Barry was a CIA plant they pushed just to see if they could get away with putting a gay Muslim communist into the land’s highest office.

Good luck there Mr. Ratcliffe and Ms. Gabbard.

No, stealing an election, or being ineligible yet still elected, if discovered long afterwards, does not mean that Biden was not President. Or JFK. Or Obama.

But in the current case it would help justify the argument that Trump deserves a third term. It may never happen, but, lots of things are happening now that never should have happened.

A most important question. Biden has been found mentally incompetent has been since the beginning of his term. So there will be a rollback of any laws, executive orders, or pardons. They can be reversed for he was cognitively incompetent.

“Call Congress”

Maybe I’m missing something, but the last place I’d call would be Congress. They’re all crooks themselves, and they would have a vested interest in protecting other pol crooks; it could be them some day.

Straight to DOJ, Tom Fitton at Judicial Watch, Mike Davis at article iii project, etc. — people who have a connection to PDJT and his administration.

You speak from a practical perspective. I get it.

From a legal perspective any office attained by fraud has no standing.

Now what?

Of course they’re all crooks.....we need to get on their backs.....remind them in no uncertain terms
we, the people, demand they straighten up and fly right......or else.

Then we have to finally drag the Daley Machine out into the light and confirm Old Joe got his boy elected using gangster means - making Richard Nixon president on his first try for it.

This illustrates why we can’t really go back and correct shenanigans; just learn from them and keep trying to build a better system.

But Biden’s pardons, according to law, aren’t binding if push to court came to shove. I say shove those rats on in.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.