Posted on 01/01/2025 12:57:31 PM PST by ransomnote
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
🌪+++🌪
@01010001
President’s Sworn In Without A Bible:
1: Thomas Jefferson (1801): He did not use a Bible, likely out of commitment to the separation of church and state.
2: John Quincy Adams (1825): He swore on a book of laws, symbolizing his commitment to the Constitution and the rule of law rather than a religious text.
3: Theodore Roosevelt (1901): He was sworn in without a Bible after the assassination of President William McKinley while on vacation; the ceremony was rushed, and no Bible was available.
4: Calvin Coolidge (1923): When Coolidge was sworn in following the death of President Warren G. Harding, his father administered the oath without a Bible, adhering to Puritan ethics which frowned upon using objects as symbols of reverence.
- - -
17: Donald John Trump (2025):
Reason: TBD
I have a theory about the Q drop re: POTUS out of the country. Will post later. Short thing.
https://truthsocial.com/@DanScavino/113862785859486857
Dan Scavino 6 min before Trump goes to the coliseum
(travels with Trump)
They just reported on ABC that Gen. Milley’s portrait had been removed from the gallery this morning.
In Ex parte Garland, which involved President Andrew Johnson’s pardon of a lawyer who had served in the legislature of the Confederacy, the court indicated that the president’s pardon power covers all federal offenses. The president can issue a pardon at any point after a crime is committed and before, during or after criminal proceedings have taken place. The president cannot, however, pardon someone for future crimes. A pardon covers both the offender’s conviction for the crime and the sentence for that crime.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/333/
In Burdick v. United States, the Supreme Court addressed the case of a newspaper editor who declined to testify before a grand jury, invoking the Fifth Amendment, even after the president pardoned him. Burdick declined to accept the pardon, and he was held in contempt for refusing to testify. The question before the Supreme Court was what effect, if any, the unaccepted pardon had. The court ruled that a pardon becomes effective only if it is accepted. The court also compared immunity, granted by Congress, and a pardon, explaining that the differences are “substantial.” Unlike immunity, the court reasoned, a pardon “carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance a confession of it.”
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/236/79/
If they accept the pardon then they are confessing that they committed the crimes. A pardon carries an imputation of guilt.
A President cannot pardon for future crimes. But the President can issue a pardon after the crime has been committed but before criminal proceedings have taken place.
So if they accept the pardon they are admitting that a crime took place, they participated in the crime and are guilty of the crime even though criminal proceedings have not taken place. It does not apply to any crimes they may commit in the future.
Fauci, the “J6” committee, Mary McCord the lawfare queen, the Biden family, General Miley etc, by accepting the pardon are admitting they participated in a crime even though criminal proceedings have not taken place.
Vague, yes, especially since no criminal proceedings, i.e. charges filed stating the crime, have taken place, but they have to admit guilt in order to accept the pardon.
I don’t think that a preemptive pardon will stand the test of a court room. It would make a mockery of justice. Fauci will never get out of the woods and next time he appears before congress he will be unable to plea the fifth and if he lies will be subject to penalty. The rest of the world has every right to go after Fauci if they have suffered at his hand.
—the Senate dithers? They had better not. They’ve long been advised who Trump wants in the top jobs and they had best get crackin’. This is on Thune as I noted way back thread. If he buttslides he can be replaced. Imaginary problems won’t be tolerated. And Pete had best be up soonest. Trump is in position now to quickly apply pain to the districts of un-responsive dunderheads. Hey Snodgrass. Sorry about that highway. It’s gonna be a year late. But I’d really like to get this bill signed to keep it from being two years late? eh? comprenday amigo?
Never heard of Marillion.
.
😉
!!++
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/barron-trump-epitomizes-his-parents-class-walks-shake/
....
Despite what the Biden-Harris regime has done to his father and his family, Barron chose class above all else.
Watch:
Barron Trump just approached Biden and Kamala to extend handshakes. WOW. pic.twitter.com/HX2dUy9MAh
— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) January 20, 2025
Nothing says boss move like squaring up to your enemies and looking into their eyes as you hold their hand and bring it towards you.
— Michael Allen (@ElvisKnevil) January 20, 2025
And Melania watching the entire thing closely
She raised a classy kid
— Amy Nixon (@texasrunnerDFW) January 20, 2025
Melania knows exactly what she’s doing. The wide brim hat is a great touch. She’s been treated so shabbily by the fashionmagdicks that I’m sure she didn’t want to give them a cheap good shot There are probly a half dozen photo freeks who have been offered 5 grand or more if they can produce a clean shot of her during the ceremonies. And she ain’t gonna give it to them-——you go girl and tell them to stuff it for four more years.
And as a private citizen she is gonna sue their asxes off for messing with her clothes drawer at MAL. Different bunch of axholes but you get the drift? Remember that pic of her confabbing with the Queen of Jordan just a couple days ago-—I’ll bet they were strategerizing?
https://x.com/KassyAkiva/status/1881375179018027064?
A guillotine has arrived at the anti-Trump protest in DC
They will play clip this again and again at Barron’s inauguration as president on January 20, 2061.
🌪+++🌪
@01010001
President’s Sworn In Without A Bible:
1: Thomas Jefferson (1801): He did not use a Bible, likely out of commitment to the separation of church and state.
2: John Quincy Adams (1825): He swore on a book of laws, symbolizing his commitment to the Constitution and the rule of law rather than a religious text.
3: Theodore Roosevelt (1901): He was sworn in without a Bible after the assassination of President William McKinley while on vacation; the ceremony was rushed, and no Bible was available.
4: Calvin Coolidge (1923): When Coolidge was sworn in following the death of President Warren G. Harding, his father administered the oath without a Bible, adhering to Puritan ethics which frowned upon using objects as symbols of reverence.
- - -
17: Donald John Trump (2025):
Reason: TBD
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There’s that “17” again...
Hmmmm...
🐷
MarQ
Could the President’s interest in restoring the McKinley name to the Mount, also include noting that McKinley was the last president to call for returning to the GOLD STANDARD?
Just heard FOX reporter casually drop that item.
How Quey is that! 😁
V for vendetta
Very Q.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.