Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Such post-election efforts will be credible only if credible attorneys sign on to mount them. So it is critical that lawyers of conscience refuse to assist in those endeavors.

TRANSLATION: "Nice law practice ya got there. Be a shame if something were to happen to it."

1 posted on 10/13/2024 3:09:51 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The New York Times has been flooding out anti-Trump articles like I have never seen before.

In poker, they call this a 'tell'.

2 posted on 10/13/2024 3:11:28 PM PDT by Lazamataz (If you are upset the bullet missed, contact me immediately. I'll make sure your bullet doesn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

In 2020 Biden had SIX THOUSAND attorneys on call to challenge the election, as Hillary and others told him not to conceded the election “no matter what happens”.

And yeah they have been destroying the livelihoods of republican attorneys and others.


3 posted on 10/13/2024 3:13:13 PM PDT by Williams (Let's Focus On Electing President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What about Biden’s POWER GRAB ????


5 posted on 10/13/2024 3:15:46 PM PDT by Mark (DONATE ONCE every 3 months-is that a big deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Just have the entire DOJ FBI CIA NSA and administrative state and MSM help rats. Only way rats have a chance against the American People.


8 posted on 10/13/2024 3:17:00 PM PDT by Track9 (If you want to know about human nature, read a power tool user manual. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The question then is whether there will be lawyers willing to cloak this insistence in the language of legal reasoning and therefore to assist him in litigating his way back to the White House.

Here's what I predict is going to happen on November 5th.

Trump will be ahead on Election Day.

Trump will be ahead the following morning. Kamala Harris will not concede the race.

In the days that follow, votes will trickle in from certain regions in certain battleground states diminishing Trump's lead. California will continue to harvest ballots that will reverse Trump's lead with the pointless "national popular vote" bragging rights.

Deadlines will pass to count absentee and mail-in votes. Trump still has the EV lead. Lawsuits will be filed to extend these deadlines as certain battleground states scramble to find votes for Kamala.

Now it's coming up on Thanksgiving. The Left is howling "We must count all the votes!" Congress is getting involved vowing to fight any certification for Trump with any legal and quasi-legal method they can think of.

Sometime shortly after Thanksgiving the Supreme Court steps in and puts an end to this madness, much as they did in 2000.

Kamala has still not conceded the race.

The Left screams, "Trump's illegitimate Supreme Court stole the presidency for him!"

Any takers on this bet?

9 posted on 10/13/2024 3:22:17 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What utter nonsense. If President Trump has a case, any attorney may take it.


10 posted on 10/13/2024 3:22:26 PM PDT by yldstrk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Anybody who trusts a NYT contributing opinion writer to be honest is an idiot.


12 posted on 10/13/2024 3:25:36 PM PDT by rellic (no such thing as a moderate Moslem or Democrat )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“… Donald Trump has made crystal clear how he will respond if he loses. He will refuse to accept the results; he will make baseless claims of voter fraud…”

Wow. They can report the future, based on their opinion, as fact. Totally credible. Sure.


13 posted on 10/13/2024 3:28:39 PM PDT by Made In The USA (Ellen Ate Dynamite Good Bye Ellen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
A Republican winning an election is now a "power grab" according to the New York Times.

Got it.

-PJ

14 posted on 10/13/2024 3:30:20 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Good Lord, the intellectual vacuity of NYT staff is nearly unbelievable. To cite just one example of many”. “ . . . he [Trump] will make baseless claims of voter fraud . . .”

First off, that’s a prediction, not a certainty; secondly, absent any indication of what the 2024 election details look like, how does one know that any such claims would be baseless?; thirdly, given that the mainstream press has shown essentially no curiosity over issues of election integrity, why would one assume that the 2024 would be at all evaluated in that context by the press? Even leftwing historians admit that the Kennedy / Nixon election in 1960 might well have been stolen in Illinois, how can the idiot responsible for this article assume any such thing is impossible today?


15 posted on 10/13/2024 3:32:14 PM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I hope they have that same sentiment when they (NYT) will finally be brought into a fair court and put to task for their complicity in influencing elections for Democrats. And the kind of ‘influencing’ I’m talking about isn’t 1st Amendment stuff - it’s actively colluding with Democrats and lying to change the election outcome.


16 posted on 10/13/2024 3:32:49 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Power grab.

Like the one that happened Jan 6, 2020 when the feds took control of the White House and Capitol and stationed NG troops to keep the people from access to their own representative government?


19 posted on 10/13/2024 3:45:16 PM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Someone should get little Katie Shaw a copy of the Constitution so's she can read it.

Can you believe that this Fascist female dog is a LAW professor?

Wait'll Americans start practicing DIY law...

21 posted on 10/13/2024 3:54:51 PM PDT by kiryandil (Kraft durch Freude! - The Kamunist and The Walzrus )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The NYT should change its name to “Pravda USA”.


24 posted on 10/13/2024 4:17:13 PM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (DemocRATS have always been the Jackass party, now they are also the Hamas(s) party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The author Kate Shaw is the wife of hard liberal lefty commentator Chris Hayes.


26 posted on 10/13/2024 4:21:32 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I live in Florida.

And I remember well Al Gore’s four county recount attempt and his army of lawyers.


27 posted on 10/13/2024 4:29:16 PM PDT by Brian Griffin (Kamala: "understand that some people need more, so we all end up in the same place, right?”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

So democracy is now a ‘power grab’. Only, I guess if Democrats don’t win. What a Stalinist position they are taking.


30 posted on 10/13/2024 4:34:52 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

And Republican cowards will say nothing.


31 posted on 10/13/2024 4:35:02 PM PDT by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yep.


32 posted on 10/13/2024 4:37:47 PM PDT by sauropod ("This is a time when people reveal themselves for who they are." James O'Keefe Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“baseless claims of voter fraud”

Except, what if it really happens? Then what? No amount of evidence will convince these people. Or, what if Trump wins? Will they accept the results? Of course not.


33 posted on 10/13/2024 4:38:21 PM PDT by cdcdawg (The Left can't meme.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson