Posted on 10/07/2024 9:48:30 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Over the last month, one methodological decision seems to have produced two parallel universes of political polling.
In one universe, Kamala Harris leads only narrowly in the national popular vote against Donald J. Trump, even as she holds a discernible edge in the Northern battlegrounds. The numbers look surprisingly similar to the 2022 midterm election.
In the other, Ms. Harris has a clear lead in the national vote, but the battlegrounds are very tight. It’s essentially a repeat of the 2020 election.
This divide is almost entirely explained by whether a pollster uses “weighting on recalled vote,” which means trying to account for how voters say they voted in the last election.
Here’s how it works. First, the pollster asks respondents whether they voted for Joe Biden or Mr. Trump in the last election. Then they use a statistical technique called weighting, in which pollsters give more or less “weight” to respondents from different demographic groups, such that each group represents its actual share of the population. In this case, the pollster weights the number of Biden ’20 or Trump ’20 voters to match the outcome of the last election.
This approach had long been considered a mistake. For reasons we’ll explain, pollsters have avoided it over the years. But they increasingly do it today, partly as a way to try to make sure they have enough Trump supporters after high-profile polling misfires in 2016 and 2020. The choice has become an important fault line among pollsters in this election, and it helps explain the whiplash that poll watchers are experiencing from day to day.
Over the last month, about two-thirds of polls were weighted by recalled vote.
An impo
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
My general read of the election started out with Trump probably losing.
Then moved to a toss up.
Then a belief Trump will win.
Now I’m back to “not sure” because some of these polls favor Harris. That ranges all the way to predictions of a Trump easy win.
The problem being, this isn’t your daddy’s electorate. They are close to turning this country into a California. Not quite but closer.
Which is why democrats can run such embarrassing candidates and campaigns.
Depends on if 2024 illegal alien votes can outdo the 2020 cheat-by-mail-in ballots as to who will be declared the 'winner.'
Hit a paywall.
I will NEVER pay for the NY Times. Heck, they delivered it today instead of the Post and ruined my day. At least the Post on-line is free.
Why does the New York Times not mention AtlasIntel, Tralfalgar Group, or RasmussenReports polls? The New York Times seems to be saying all credible polls show Harris leading the national popular vote.
“All the news we fit to print.”
In a sense this is somewhat a fair article, because he is talking about one methodology, the recalled vote. However, there is a different universe being picked up out there in which I hope is more true than this methodology.
Then they use a statistical technique called weighting, in which pollsters give more or less “weight” to respondents from different demographic groups, such that each group represents its actual share of the population.
This is not 1988. It is 2024.
So by 2036 or so, AOC will become President.
PS - It would be a violation of the FR consent agreement to post a link to the bypassed version of an article, or to tell people how to do it in a thread. The only way they will know that I told you how to do it is if you tell them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.