Posted on 08/05/2024 8:31:15 AM PDT by Red Badger
This year all 32 NFL teams will start using facial recognition to verify the identity of people entering the stadium.
This is a clip that was posted recently on the Dallas Cowboys website. It shows how easy it is to identify someone in these large crowds.
VIDEO AT LINK......................
Yeah, I just make it up. Pick a team. Any team. For example:
Acrisure Stadium (Pittsburgh Steelers) is owned and operated by The Sports & Exhibition Authority of Pittsburgh and Allegheny County (also known as the Sports & Exhibition Authority or SEA). The Sports & Exhibition Authority of Pittsburgh and Allegheny County is a municipal authority that owns and operates public sports and entertainment venues in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania and the City of Pittsburgh.
These globalists are using YOUR tax money against you, creating illicit government entities in order to do so, and you're lashing out at those who call it.
And then rented to the Steelers. Renters have rights you know. Including the ability to control access. Lots of companies rent lots of venues from the government, and then only allow ticket holders to enter. And these buildings often have security systems in place, both to aid the renters in controlling access and to secure the building when it isn’t being rending.
I’m not lashing out at anybody. You’re doing all the lashing. I’m pointing out that you’re wrong. And your need to lash shows you know you’re wrong.
It shows up on ours at the self-serve checkout registers—you can see your own face. Also, there is a large screen suspended from the very high ceiling at the entrances, angled downward so you can see yourself entering the store. Presumably to deter shoplifting, but like any other collected data, vulnerable to misuse by government or other marketers.
This is not about security - this is about using a government entity to violate peoples' rights.
Renting is renting is renting is renting. The rights remain the same.
It is absolutely about security. And it is not a government. And no one’s rights are being violated. You are wrong on all counts. Making up fictions to support an argument that has no grounding.
Security cameras are legal.
Comparing people to photos to verify their legitimacy is legal.
Using computers to do it quickly changes none of this.
Taking government money changes none of this.
Renting a government facility changes none of this.
Everything they’re doing has been going on in some form or another since the 70s. Throwing a tantrum about it now is silly.
You are wrong. 100% across the board completely totally in all aspects wrong.
No. Because it's not about security and never was.
And yes, it is a government. Ignoring that they've created a government body to own and run the venue tells you exactly what it's about. Deny it all you want.
Again, we understand this is a Free Republic. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.
There is ABSOLUTELY security in a museum. Do you think you could walk into the good part of the Smithsonian without any kind of verification?! Really?! How about the US Mint? NORAD? Leavenworth? This whole idea you’re throwing around that they can’t have security at government owned buildings is frankly asinine and embarrassing.
It is about security. And no freedoms are violated by not any random dumbass walk into a stadium.
May you learn basic logic and thought. Cause I know 8 year olds that understand this better than you. You are just plain etong. And incapable of listening or learning. Buh bye
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.