Posted on 08/01/2024 5:16:41 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Were Kamala and Joe the best the RATs have?
They are the best that want any piece of Trump. The smart ones are already looking forward to 2028.
When people learn how Kamala treats her staff she will become toxic except to women who are just like her.
They don’t have to be that good.
It really, doesn’t take much to tip the scales nowadays - every election from 2004 through 2020 (sans 2008) was decided by 500,000 votes or less. Allow me to quantify that.
Gen.Blather wrote recently that his Uncle who was big in Ohio Repub circles said “ said, each party candidate will attract about forty percent of the total vote. It doesn’t matter who they are, whether they’re good candidates or even if they’re dead. They get forty percent. All elections are a fight for the necessary eleven percent to make 51%”
He’s a smart man. I would argue, however, it’s actually LESS than that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_elections_by_popular_vote_margin
Since Reagan’s landslide in 1984, the popular vote margin ranged from a high of 8.51% for Clinton to a low of -2.09% for Trump.
As we know, the popular vote isn’t the decider - it’s the Electoral College. Thus you have to scrutinize the winning vote margin in those close states that tip the balance to the winner, ie the Tipping Point states. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipping-point_state
Since 2004 every election except for 2008 it came down to the handful of states that tip the Electoral College scale to the winner:
- In Trump’s win in 2016, his cumulative winning margin in the tipping point states of Wi, Mi, and PA was 77,444 votes.
-In Biden’s case, his tipping point margin was about 40k votes.
-Obama in 2012, it was about 500k votes.
-Bush in 2004, about 16k votes.
All this campaigning and rallies and debates blah blah blah…it all comes down in general to beating the other guy (or gal) by less than 100,000 votes.
….and it’s actually thinner than that, because all the losing candidate needed was to flip at least half of those votes.
“Were Kamala and Joe the best the RATs have?”
Yes they are. And Joe has been the president for the last 4 years. Since nothing has been done to stop the cheat, there is no reason to believe that Kamala will not be the president for the next 4 years. With the regular cheat and the addition of 20 million illegals and I say she will end up with about 91 million votes and will be the next president.
No, actually anyone would do who could be bought or manipulated. The dems feel at this point they can impose their team on the nation just like they did to their own party. It’s brazen and in your face.
At the time Biden appointed her his border czar (a Jill-inspired scheme to sabotage
her by making her responsible for the border atrocity), Kamala protested loud and clear:
“They’re not gonna pin this on me,” she bellowed.
“Were Kamala and Joe the best the RATs have?”
From the hidden fascist, Marxist and communist leaders perspective, yes, they were the best. Joe had dementia related issues that diminished his cognitive abilities. The horizontal one never had cognitive abilities to begin with. This made both of those power hungry idiots easy to control puppets.
With the aid and propping up by the MSM it worked!
But I kinda think the country has had their fill of the nation’s destruction and is fully aware Harris will only worsen things.
Very true and good reasoning as you said the floors are already set let the battle for the few begin
Oh, you sweet-talker, you!
I remember when Biden named Harris the border czar. She saw what was coming and her reaction was, “You’re not pinning that sh&t on me!” She knew it was a poison pill.
Red Wave... LOL.
Don’t forget about the cheat factor.
Interesting. Thanks!
“When people learn how Kamala treats her staff she will become toxic except to women who are just like her.”
Whistling past the graveyard. Today’s voting demographic no doubt could elect her POTUS.
That’s why the “no evidence of widespread voter fraud” is meaningless. It doesn’t take widespread fraud, just carefully chosen spots here and there.
But are any Dems really upset that they were not granted their right to select their party nominee? I'm not sure, I'll bet Dems welcome it, it's easier that way, don't have to take time to vote and all.
The Democrat Crime Families are getting old.
The greedy old codgers are going to keep stealing from us until they pass away.
They have held on for so long that the young Democrat Crime Families are weak.
Greed.
It’s always the same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.