Posted on 07/19/2024 12:23:53 PM PDT by hardspunned
A wild conspiracy theory about the woman who was acting strangely behind Donald Trump as he was shot has been condemned.
The woman sparked suspicion over her bizarrely-relaxed behavior after she failed to flinch and even pulled out her phone as shots rang out at the Pennsylvania rally last week.
An outlandish conspiracy theory has since emerged claiming that the woman was FBI assistant director Janeen DiGuiseppi - and that she was directing the sniper who almost killed Trump.
They also alleged the woman they claimed as DiGuiseppi gave a nod before gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks opened fire.
But both conservatives and liberals have since condemned the theory.
'If you believe the assistant director of the FBI was sitting front row at a Trump rally to “give instructions” to the shooter, you are an absolute moron. Like, next-level stupid,' a Red State journalist known only as Bonchie wrote on X.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Could be something as simple as she’s deaf..................like me...........
There is sometuhg really queer about her. Her identity should be easy, she was given a VIP seat,
I heard another one today that they found Crooks has $1 million in an overseas account. Just hearsay. Probably rumor.
Could you do that knowing that punk was going to be spraying 5.56 rounds at the man a few feet in front of you?
~~~
If you are psychopath, yes.
You wouldn’t flinch.
...and yes, you’d want to be front row, center.
Like I said in another thread, it would be feeling like you got to be Zapruter, but not filming with 16mm from far away. It would appeal to a psychopath’s ego.
“’If you believe the assistant director of the FBI was sitting front row at a Trump rally to “give instructions” to the shooter, you are an absolute moron...”
I notice two things about this sentence.
For one, the media all of a sudden finds thier ability to call conspiracy theories “moron”(s) when they seem to come from the right. The left is allowed to conspiracy theory all day long, such as Joy Reid saying the assassination was staged. Did daily call Reid a moron?
Secondly, that they phrase it in terms of them “giving instructions”. An intelligent psychopath isn’t dumb enough to show that they are giving the nod... that doesn’t mean they don’t want to witness it first hand.
I give this conspiracy theory a 1 out of 10 on the plausibility scale. I’m also not buying into it.
But for creativity, I give it a 7 out of 10.
Most of the truthers are saying the whole thing was a white hat operation. I like a conspiracy theory as much as the next guy but this was a cookie cutter FBI hit job. A deep state hail Mary.
Pretty obvious for you, I don’t know if that would have ever occurred to me.
And the DM is just getting wound up, no doubt.
Wait until the DM learns what Laura Loomer has reported today on X about the AGR building...
The extensive web of interconnections regarding the American Glass Research building is absolutely astounding: the AGR company, the building ownership (recently changed to foreign-owned), the connection to Blackrock, Pfizer, the Council on Foreign Relations, the ultra-liberal Brookings Institution, Raytheon, World Economic Forum, the chief of Staff to Democrat Montana Senator Max Baucus (Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee), Barack Obama (made Baucus the US ambassador to CHINA). Baucus is on the Board of Advisors to Alibaba (owned by the Chinese Communist Party).It's a veritable rogue's gallery. What are the odds that a randomly selected building would have ownership with all these DS connections? That the Trump rally would be scheduled adjacent to a building with all these DS connections?
As is always asked, are all these merely coincidences? Or are there sinister forces behind these things?
Well, then who was she? And where was the Asst Director of FBI? Resemblance is quite uncanny. And her behavior is suspicious. Plus, not getting answers, seeing all the issues with the security plan and execution, and knowing our government is never straight with us, thus giving rise to more conspiracy theories and distrust. We just want the whole truth!
Bookmark.
I thought of that when the subject first came up here, but it seems gunshots would register through bone conduction for most people.
I think she was just one of those people who don’t react quickly; or confusion/shock caused a delay in reaction.
Some people there said that at first they thought the sound was fireworks.
So then let's certainly post it here. Good job.
She did look suspicious.
Something to keep in mind is how video cameras compress the depth of field. While it appears that the crowd is sitting mere feet away from the president, it is more likely they were 10-15 yards behind him. With the ambient noise, it is likely the people sitting back there did not hear the first shots very well. It’s not really shocking that people would not “react” immediately.
Not worried about her if she was near the very observant guy near the center with the camo rimmed hat.He’d have noticed it.
Yeah McCaul said that, that he has 3 overseas accounts
What I want to know is..since we know now that Trump, Harris and Jill Biden ALL had events in PA that Saturday..who had their event planned first..did Trump plan his first or did others plan theirs first
Check this one out. It dang well sounds like three different rifles to me. Water tower?
https://x.com/mjtruthultra/status/1814350132068135305?s=46&t=oXM3QUNDayEotvdo1W-zQA
Audio Forensics Confirms at Least Three SEPARATE WEAPONS Were Fired in Assassination Attempt
• the first three shots are consistent in sound and distance (bullet, echo, report)…
• The next group of 5 shots are clearly from different weapons
—— the sixth shot even sounds different than shots
• the last shot is reportedly the Sniper who took Crooks out
🔴 CNN ODDLY CONFIRMS — Audio forensics suggest as many as three weapons fired at Trump rally
Her hat said (in part) Jesus is my Savior, which might help explain her lack of fear.
Seems like she would identify herself somehow, or somebody else would identify her.
I hate it when people use the word “debunked” when somebody just says that a thought is crazy. That’s not debunking, that’s disagreeing. Debunking is when you prove that what is claimed cannot be, usually because you prove that its opposite is true.
I’ve seen people say these people would never do this. We can’t say that; the crap done by the Deep State has been blatantly in-your-face. They do that to demoralize us - that they can do unthinkable things right in full view, and nobody can do anything about it.
I’ve seen people claim that this gal has the wrong shape of face to be the FBI deputy director. Maybe, but it’s hard to tell with so much of her face covered, as well as the possibility that the deputy director lost weight. Or there are other reasons a jawline changes shape - including dental implants, although that’s probably not likely in this case.
Somebody has mentioned that since this was the VIP section it should be pretty easy to find out who she is and simply ask her for her explanation of her behavior. Since she was taking video, maybe she posted the video somewhere.
But right now we have a suggestion of who she is and simply need more information.
Nothing has been either proven or debunked.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.