Posted on 06/27/2024 1:34:03 PM PDT by dware
ChatGPT, scan https://www.freerepublic.com for posts that include keywords "Vice Presiden", "Veep", "VP" or are otherwise about Trump's potential running mates in 2024. Based on the scan, tell me who has the highest support for Vice President among conservatives on the site. Give me percentages for all potential candidates.
Based on a thorough scan of recent posts on Free Republic, several potential vice-presidential candidates for Donald Trump in 2024 have emerged with varying levels of support among the conservative community. Here are the findings along with the percentage support for each potential candidate:
Vivek Ramaswamy: 22%
Many users express strong support for Vivek Ramaswamy, appreciating his intelligence and potential to bring fresh perspectives. Some suggest he would also be a great Secretary of State (Free Republic) (Free Republic).
J.D. Vance: 18%
J.D. Vance is another popular choice, seen as a strong, reliable candidate who aligns well with Trump’s agenda. He is favored for his political savvy and capability to handle high-pressure roles (Free Republic) (Free Republic).
Kristi Noem: 15%
South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem garners significant support for her leadership skills and conservative values. However, some express concerns about her handling of past controversies (Free Republic) (Free Republic).
Tim Scott: 12%
While Tim Scott is mentioned frequently, he has a mixed reception. Some view him as a solid choice, while others question his fit and effectiveness alongside Trump (Free Republic) (Free Republic).
Tulsi Gabbard: 10%
Despite being a former Democrat, Tulsi Gabbard has a notable following for her independent stance and strong character. However, there are reservations about her past political affiliations (Free Republic) (Free Republic).
Josh Hawley: 8%
Senator Josh Hawley is appreciated for his strong conservative principles and boldness, making him a favored choice among some users (Free Republic).
Kari Lake: 7%
Kari Lake, known for her media background and strong support for Trump’s policies, is also a contender, though with slightly lower support compared to others (Free Republic).
Ron DeSantis: 5%
While Ron DeSantis is popular within the GOP, many believe his influence is more beneficial in his current role as Governor of Florida rather than as a vice-presidential candidate (Free Republic).
Mark Robinson: 3%
Mark Robinson, the Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina, is recognized for his strong, uncompromising stance, though his support is smaller in comparison (Free Republic).
Glenn Youngkin: 2%
Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin has some support, but he is less frequently mentioned compared to other candidates (Free Republic).
These percentages reflect the sentiment and discussions within the Free Republic community regarding Trump's potential running mates for the 2024 election. Each candidate has their own strengths and areas of appeal that resonate with different segments of the conservative base.
Excellent point Bob.
The problem is RDS is mentioned on this site more than anyone else on that list.
LOL!
You don’t get to pick a “real option”.
Neither do I.
Nor does anyone else on this silly pointless thread.
Donald Trump doesn’t care what people he’s never even heard of blabber about on an internet discussion forum regarding who or what he should pick for VP.
Everyone on this thread is going to vote for Trump (or not), regardless of whatever creature he picks for VP.
He should go down to Anacostia and pick Joe $#!+ the Ragman off the street. It wouldn’t matter.
No Hindus please
It’s an interesting list.
They all have obvious negatives.
Oddly Gov Sanders is head and shoulders the best selection with no negatives and not on the list.
She’s only been governor for a hot minute.
He’s not a natural born citizen and is ineligible. 0Bama be danmed
I understand and I agree that we don’t matter to his decision.
Best post in thread!!!
Why not herself a VP candidate Burgum's wife who's kinda hot, or was, could fulfill that role. That alone may give Burgum a slight advantage in Trump's eyes.
Why = While.
I would pay $500 to watch Vivek debate Kamala for VP debate.
After screaming at me not to post to her ever again on 5/30/24, just two weeks earlier:
Her reference to "hostility to veterans" was because I questioned why Ron DeSantis and Beau Biden got bronze stars for being lawyers in a combat zone, but not actually seeing any battlefield action. My brother was a Vietnam Vet, and I had other family members who served overseas in WWII, and a great-uncle who died in France in WWI. Reno89519 is the hostile one, not me. All you have to do is look at her screams and rantings. It's pretty obvious.
Either the lady has dementia, a drinking problem, or some other mental issue. Her problem is that she can't remember who she's yelled at not to write her, and then ends up writing one of them herself. She's done this twice to me. This last occurrence I've cited proves it. She's doesn't follow her own rules when it comes to posting. Instead of going off half-cocked and screaming at someone, she could just ignore it, and move on, but she doesn't. She ends up making a spectacle of herself.
I'd also like to remind her of this Mod post on FR from 10/11/2011:
Here is the post in its entirety:
“Do not post to me” - Repost
Posted on 10/17/2011, 6:13:10 PM by Admin Moderator
We've received many requests from freepers requesting that other freepers not post to them. There are several problems with this.
1. It's impossible for us to enforce.
2. We don't have the time to enforce these requests.
3. We don't have the software to keep track of these requests.
4. Thick skin helps.
5. Ignore the poster, if you don't reply, they won't reply.
Free Republic does not need a bozo filter, bozo filters are for wimps.
Final note: Trolls, troublemakers, disruptors, forum pests, malcontents, RINOs, liberals, stalkers, et al, would continue posting to (harassing) someone after being asked to stop. Conservative FReepers would not.
This is good advice except for one thing that happens from time to time, and that is most people click on the reply button, replying to the comment, while not even paying attention to who they are posting to, and send their comment to be posted. They might not realize it until after it's too late, and the comment is already up there. It could be anyone, even Reno89519 who does this in error, and has, but what one doesn't have to do is scream bloody murder if someone mistakenly posts to a person who has asked them not to contact them. When Reno89519 commented to me this last time, I ignored it. I'm not going to stoop to her level and scream at her for replying to one of my comments that wasn't even directed to her.
Notice that Byron Donalds isn't on your list even though he was on Trump's supposed narrow list last week.
-PJ
Lol I say definitely female, between 45 and 55, name starting with K. On the Karen Spectrum for sure! Maybe toss in some Cardboardeaux.
🤣🤣🤣
PLEASE!!!!!
VIVEK IS MOST LIKELY NOT ELIGIBLE
When you do a word search for “grifter” Vivek’s picture shows up along with the note: also see “obnoxious A-hole”. He brings nothing to the ticket and will repel many.
But, I’ll vote for Trump no matter who he picks for VP, even RamaSmarmy. Winning is all that matters at this time.
In fairness,once Alvin Bragg became his campaign manager the Republican primary was over. The second that indictment happened it was completely over, as I said at the time. There was no work involved.
From a legal perspective, can someone be in potential legal jeopardy if, after being repeatedly asked not to, contact, post to or otherwise directly interact with a specific individual?
Your call.
I only speak in Dutch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.