Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US supreme court strikes down federal ban on ‘bump stock’ devices for guns
The Guardian ^ | Syndicated

Posted on 06/14/2024 7:25:32 AM PDT by KierkegaardMAN

The US supreme court has struck down a federal ban on “bump stocks”, the devices which can vamp up semi-automatic firearms to discharge ammunition almost as rapidly as machine guns and that have been behind some of the most devastating mass shootings in recent history.

The top court’s ruling in Garland v Cargill nullifies the Trump administration’s 2018 regulation from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) which ordered anyone who owned a bump stock to destroy it or hand it over to federal agents. The rule was passed in the after the devastating 2017 mass shooting at a music festival in Las Vegas, in which a gunman fired more than 1,000 rounds, killing 60 people and injuring almost 500.

(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; trumpban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Trumps ATF overstepped
1 posted on 06/14/2024 7:25:32 AM PDT by KierkegaardMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KierkegaardMAN

The opinion still leaves forced reset triggers as questionable: it depends on what a “single function of the trigger” means- a pull only (banned)? or are one pull and one release two separate functions of the trigger (ok)?


2 posted on 06/14/2024 7:29:54 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KierkegaardMAN

Has the ban on fully automatic weapons ever been tested in court?

Specifically the Thompson sub-machine gun, aka ‘Tommy Gun’............................


3 posted on 06/14/2024 7:30:23 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

4 posted on 06/14/2024 7:33:09 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KierkegaardMAN

The article needs fact checking.


5 posted on 06/14/2024 7:34:34 AM PDT by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KierkegaardMAN

Who gives a crap about bump stocks...there are States that have outlawed AR15s, THAT is what the SC needs to be addressing.


6 posted on 06/14/2024 7:35:06 AM PDT by Democrat = party of treason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Spock...Are you out of your Vulcan mind?”


7 posted on 06/14/2024 7:35:21 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KierkegaardMAN

Ruling (6-3) puts the act of making laws back into the branch of government our Constitution requires, namely Congress and NOT the White House.


8 posted on 06/14/2024 7:35:25 AM PDT by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement! There)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KierkegaardMAN

Yep.

Considering that the ban on bump stocks has been fully litigated, we still don’t have the details behind the case.


9 posted on 06/14/2024 7:38:17 AM PDT by vg0va3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KierkegaardMAN

bkmk


10 posted on 06/14/2024 7:38:18 AM PDT by sauropod ("This is a time when people reveal themselves for who they are." James O'Keefe Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democrat = party of treason

They are saving the last two most important crucial ruling before they skedaddle for safety! Don’t know if it’s good or bad but I’m praying that it is positive for those who are unjustly in prison and Trump!


11 posted on 06/14/2024 7:44:03 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

This is sweet.

Now, what about those who have been prosecuted for this non-crime?


12 posted on 06/14/2024 7:44:58 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Trump's experience? We're next.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KierkegaardMAN

I don’t think this means congress itself couldn’t ban bump stocks but just that the ATF overstepped their authority from congress in banning them.


13 posted on 06/14/2024 7:45:59 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milagro

yes a pushback on the aggressive bureaucratic state.


14 posted on 06/14/2024 7:46:31 AM PDT by avital2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Democrat = party of treason

Rights weren’t eroded overnight and won’t be restored overnight. Take the W and prepare for the next battle.


15 posted on 06/14/2024 7:49:41 AM PDT by mrmeyer (You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KierkegaardMAN
If you listen to the audio from the Las Vegas event, there is real full-auto. It was too smooth, fast and sustained to be a "bump stock". I've never been attracted to "bump stocks". They just waste lots of ammo with poor aim.

The court made a good decision. The determination of semi-auto vs full-auto has always been about how many shots are discharged with a single trigger pull. Semi-auto means ONE shot. Full-auto means discharges continue as long as the trigger remains depressed and ammunition remains. The mechanics of the fire control assembly dictate the function.

16 posted on 06/14/2024 8:03:22 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

I agree there was full auto being fired at the Vegas shooting. I am also convinced there was more than one shooter.


17 posted on 06/14/2024 8:09:19 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

There is no ban on full auto. You have to pay a tax when applying.


18 posted on 06/14/2024 8:15:44 AM PDT by DownInFlames (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames

As long as it was made before 1986, everything else is banned for a citizen.


19 posted on 06/14/2024 8:43:58 AM PDT by bak3r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: KierkegaardMAN

Oh hey, look what I found in the back of my closet.


20 posted on 06/14/2024 9:08:13 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson