Exactly, “POC only” job postings apparently are good to go.
Well, they probably needed to learn the cost of stupidity.
Just say “pale” or “whitish” or “sallow” or “pasty” or “PONC” (person of non-color) next time
They seem to be creating a media event
The Civil Rights Division’s Immigrant and Employee Rights Section opened an investigation in May 2023 and “determined that Arthur Grand discriminated based on citizenship status and national origin after a recruiter working for Arthur Grand’s subsidiary in India posted the advertisement on the job website Indeed.”
I'm willing to bet that wording came from India managers to make sure all those incomprehensible recruiters who work for them only go after US citizens.
Melanin study? Justus better back off.
Are Indians “white”?
I guarantee that the job posting was written by someone from India, an Indian manager at the company. No white American is this stupid. I am not saying the Indian is stupid, but he did it out of ignorance, not understanding the political and legal implications, but wanting to “level the playing field”.
Hopefully this post was a setup for litigation, which should now be forthcoming against tens of thousands of job listings specifying POCs.
They’re gonna’ keep going until we have no rights left at all.
Their lawyers should immediately point out the disparate justice and that the, so called, civil rights division does NOT go after “black only” job postings.
Naan-compliant job-Sikhers ping.
How about “We are looking for outstanding performers who don’t stand out.”
No one but Donald Trump!
They were apparently trying to recruit a US Citizen employee in Dallas and the dope recruiter added “[white]”. Never heard of the company but serves them right for having a subsidiary in India.
White people are the only people it is legal to discriminate against, and discrimination against them is required by law.
It looks like the text in [square brackets] was not meant to be printed. Someone left it in and all hell broke loose.
You guys should read job listings from The Philippines, they state the age range, education, sex, and other traits that their desired employee much have.
Why can’t us taxpayers fine the Justice Department? Somebody should have overwatch on those idiots.
"After ‘whites only’ job posting, Va. tech company hit with fine from the Justice Department"
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Patriots are reminded that the only race-related protection that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect limits the federal government powers to voting rights remedies, evidenced by the 15th Amendment.
"15th Amendment:
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Also consider, since constitutionally enumerated sex protections are likewise limited to voting rights remedies, that much of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and its titles are probably unconstitutional imo.
"19th Amendment: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
Democratic and Republican Trump supporters need to support hopeful Trump 47 with a new patriot Congress in November, not only so that he will not be a lame duck president from the first day of his second term in office, the new Congress also taking unconstitutional federal laws out of the books and deciding the fate of people in prison for breaking such politically correct, vote-winning laws.
From the congressional record, a clarification about the federal government's constitutionally limited peacetime powers by Rep. John Bingham, a constitutional lawmaker:
"Our Constitution never conferred upon the Congress of the United States the power - sacred as life is, first as it is before all other rights which pertain to man on this side of the grave - to protect it in time of peace by the terrors of the penal code within organized states; and Congress has never attempted to do it. There never was a law upon the United States statute-book to punish the murderer for taking away in time of peace the life of the noblest, and the most unoffending, as well, of your citizens, within the limits of any State of the Union [emphases added]. The protection of the citizen in that respect was left to the respective States, and there the power is to-day.” —Rep. John Bingham, Congressional Globe. (See bottom half of third column.)