|
Posted on 03/03/2024 12:36:23 PM PST by ransomnote
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
NEW Q THREAD
MARCH 3, 2024
START AT #1
Thanks for the ping, bitt. Thanks for the post, ‘note.
#GROAN#...
ROFLMAO!
New thread - big week ahead!
In!
Thanks MQD!
While I was away, my kids had to help my best dog in the world off into the dog heaven in the sky. She was a Lab/Mutt rescue, about 15-16 years old.
We will have a Celebration of her Life with the grandkids, complete with a doggy cake, interpretive dances, hand-drawn pictures of her with the relatives and other dogs gone before, and then let them wreck the house as usual.
Life goes on.
Thanks, rn. Be well❗
In like Flynn!
-SB
On a happier note;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
WATCH:
NEW: Donald Trump suggests the only thing prosecutor Nathan Wade is good at is pounding Fani Willis because she called him “2000 times.”
Remarkable.
“I was indicted by Fani in Georgia… her lover, Nathan Wade, and they hired him for almost a million dollars because of his… pic.twitter.com/27uQLUY8oG
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) March 3, 2024
https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1764100107958735166?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/fireworks-trump-says-quiet-part-loud-fani-willis/
Hurrying to get in under my current weight . . . ha ha ha
Heyyyyy, wait a minute . . . is "2000 times" how many times she communicated to him? Or is it (infinitely worse) a "descriptive nickname"? Aiyeee! Heh. :-)
I started at 33.
An early thread appearance of the IFTYS gal at 33. This thread gonna be lit y’all.
IN™
I’ll be voting. It was a hypothetical question. What will they say?
Guy.
We’ve seen that one naked. It’s a gal.
Dont want to see it naked.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
