Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time -- Part XXXI
Manhattan Contrarian ^ | 8 Feb, 2023 | Francis Menton

Posted on 01/08/2024 5:09:10 AM PST by MtnClimber

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 01/08/2024 5:09:10 AM PST by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

It seems the most common stories I hear on the local news channel are about LGBTQ+++ and Hottest (day, month, year) stories.


2 posted on 01/08/2024 5:09:22 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAntKnee

Manhattan Contrarian ping


3 posted on 01/08/2024 5:10:02 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“The Greatest Scientific Fraud of All Time”

The climate hoax is certainly one of the very biggest frauds in history but personally I would rank evolution as #1.


4 posted on 01/08/2024 5:13:51 AM PST by Stingray51 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stingray51

You would of course be totally wrong


5 posted on 01/08/2024 5:28:53 AM PST by bert ( (KWE. NP. N.C. +12) Hamasci de is required in totalhe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bert
You would of course be totally wrong

says bert , a true believer in the "Nothing exploded and became everything " cult.

6 posted on 01/08/2024 5:37:34 AM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Vet, John Adams Descendant , deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

In other words, they are simply lying. As computer programmers say, garbage in, garbage out.


7 posted on 01/08/2024 5:40:17 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants ( "It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled."- Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
We have had 30 years where each year was touted by the media as the hottest year on record.

The generally accepted minimal resolvable temperature variation of the Earth is 0.15 degrees Centigrade.

So it follows that the accumulated aggregate temperature increase would be 30X0.15C = 4.5 degrees C.

A 4.5 degree C increase converts to an 8 degree F increase so if the press accounts were accurate we would be seeing an average accumulated temperature rise of 8 degrees F which is simply preposterous.

The global warming fraud is eventually going to come undone because the dire predictions are simply not playing out over an extended period of time.

The triple witching hour of the climate fanatics is 2030 because they have predicted an existential destruction of the world via climate catastrophe due to global warming

8 posted on 01/08/2024 5:43:22 AM PST by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

On a 4.5 BILLION year old planet that has seen climate variations we can’t even imagine we’re debating one digit temperature fluctuations over a 10 year period. Unbelievable.


9 posted on 01/08/2024 5:51:44 AM PST by suthener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suthener

Global warming

There is much misinformation about the normal temperature on Earth. Here is some science that refutes the lies:

Earth historical temperature has both long-term and relatively shorter-term variations. Long term variations last many millions of years and are called ice ages and warm ages. The shorter-term variations are called glacial cycles and interglacial warm cycles and are overlaid on top of the long-term ice and warm ages. Many will be surprised that we are in an ice age, but also in an interglacial warm cycle.

The first graph shows the long-term average global temperature view of warm periods and ice age periods:

Note that Ice ages vary in length, but 50 million years is pretty typical. Warm ages last much longer than ice ages.

The second graph shows temperature variations for the last 450,000 years in our current Ice Age which started about 10 million years ago, depending on exactly where you want to specify the start temperature from graph 1. (The temperature scale on graph 2 is the average temperature at the Antarctica glacier bore site, not the same as the average global temperature from graph 1):

The temperature for the current interglacial warm cycle from ice core data in Greenland is shown in graph 3. Note that the temperature always fluctuates and that the current temperature is not out of the normal range of fluctuations. Also note that on the lower left there is an error. Where it says “End of the last Ice Age” it should say “End of the last Glacial Cycle” because we are still in the last Ice Age, just in an interglacial warm cycle.

I frequently update this writeup to try to make it clearer. If you have a comment or suggestion, please send me a FR-Mail.

10 posted on 01/08/2024 5:56:59 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

11 posted on 01/08/2024 6:01:21 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while l aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

BTTT


12 posted on 01/08/2024 6:06:18 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn1; MtnClimber
The global warming fraud is eventually going to come undone because the dire predictions are simply not playing out over an extended period of time.

The triple witching hour of the climate fanatics is 2030 because they have predicted an existential destruction of the world via climate catastrophe due to global warming

I don’t know why you think that.

They have repeatedly moved the goal post in the past.

Why would they not just move the day of destruction again?

I am sure that the Global Warmist will soon announce that we are doomed in 2040.

They are not going to give up on this scam. It just works too well and the people that believe it are never going to believe that is all a lie. It has become a part of their belief system.

13 posted on 01/08/2024 6:23:39 AM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The Covid/Covid vaccine hoax is just as large IMHO.

And has killed millions........


14 posted on 01/08/2024 6:28:29 AM PST by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suthener

“On a 4.5 BILLION year old planet that has seen climate variations we can’t even imagine we’re debating one digit temperature fluctuations over a 10 year period. Unbelievable.”

Morons are in charge. We are allowing the Morons to be in charge.


15 posted on 01/08/2024 6:28:47 AM PST by Chgogal (Welcome to Fuhrer Biden's Weaponized Fascist Banana Republic! It's the road to hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Temperatures are adjusted every year, in such way that decrease old temperatures and rises recent ones, to show some warming.
The explanation, I found, is that the data are taken mostly by volunteers who are going more sloppy every year!
That is, really, the explanation for the adjustments!
Unbelievable!


16 posted on 01/08/2024 6:30:42 AM PST by AZJeep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Most still claim last year was the hottest year in decades.


17 posted on 01/08/2024 6:39:40 AM PST by bray (You can tell who the Commies fear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

It looks like the cycle of SUVs is about 100,000 years. Every 100,000 years SUVs cause mother earth to warm, then taxes are increased and the EVs take over and mother earth cools again.

EC


18 posted on 01/08/2024 6:41:07 AM PST by Ex-Con777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

“The Case for Skepticism on Global Warming”

On January 25, 2005, at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., towering writer, and himself a scientist, Michael Crichton delivered a detailed explanation of why he criticized the consensus view on global warming.

Using published UN data, he argued that claims for catastrophic warming arouse doubt; that reducing CO2 is vastly more difficult than is commonly presumed.

Crichton, a doctor (who does not practice medicine) spoke on why societies are morally unjustified in spending vast sums on a speculative issue when people around the world are dying of starvation and disease.


19 posted on 01/08/2024 6:51:48 AM PST by Liz (Actor/Sen Fred Thompson:"After being in DC, I often long for Hollywood's realism and sincerity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

When tens of trillions of dollars are involved, you will find corruption, and lots of it.


20 posted on 01/08/2024 6:54:26 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson